| Revision as of 04:22, 29 January 2007 edit17Drew (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,531 edits →Message: reply to Velten← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:21, 31 January 2007 edit undoCanuck01 (talk | contribs)715 edits →MessageNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| You need to understand something: I am tired of associating with you, and you are now more than evidently getting in my way of editing, likely to institute blocks for a period of time for your own entertainment. As you've been told several times before, you don't own articles, so stop treating them — ] ones in particular — as if they are. You're not being inconspicuous and I'm particularly sick of having to go through this process because of your intolerable antics. Therefore, ''stop'' reverting good-faith edits for the sake of labelling them as "harassment" for your own blocking-humor. ] 15:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | You need to understand something: I am tired of associating with you, and you are now more than evidently getting in my way of editing, likely to institute blocks for a period of time for your own entertainment. As you've been told several times before, you don't own articles, so stop treating them — ] ones in particular — as if they are. You're not being inconspicuous and I'm particularly sick of having to go through this process because of your intolerable antics. Therefore, ''stop'' reverting good-faith edits for the sake of labelling them as "harassment" for your own blocking-humor. ] 15:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :Though I'm not sure that a complete revert was necessary, I must say I'm concerned about , which states that it was at #1 on 12/15 when the reference ''right there'' states that it was at #9. ] 04:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | :Though I'm not sure that a complete revert was necessary, I must say I'm concerned about , which states that it was at #1 on 12/15 when the reference ''right there'' states that it was at #9. ] 04:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :I agree with everything ] had to say. Nothing I want to add, or take away. By far, you are one of the worst editors in th encyclopedia. As it was said, you do not own articles. Stop taking important useful encyclopedia meterial away. My problem is with your revertions in the ] - "]" page. 21:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:21, 31 January 2007
I LOVE HIM ALWAYS FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!! lalalallalalalalalallalalallalalalalalalallalala you probably think i'm insane, well i'm not, everyone else is !!!!!!!!!!!Jogfdijzgozfjmligufiohfiofgiofgziofiooijfdiojfioj I LOVE HIM ALWAYS FOREVER!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Man, when you lose it, you lose it! Happy New Year! Bishonen | talk 03:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC).
- Yeah, I agree. Love u EM, lol. You are so random. Come say hi, u have my e-mail. Orane (talk • cont.) 09:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Is he for real? or did someone hack into his account:|. 58.166.220.30 03:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I'm sure he's for real. The only question is if he'll come back if I nominate Hollaback Girl and No Doubt and all the other Gwen Stefani-related articles at WP:FAC, claiming to be the reincarnation of Eternal Equinox, will he end up coming back? ShadowHalo 07:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Is he for real? or did someone hack into his account:|. 58.166.220.30 03:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree. Love u EM, lol. You are so random. Come say hi, u have my e-mail. Orane (talk • cont.) 09:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Haha, you almost had me thinking it was possible to leave Misplaced Pages. And just when I was about to add you to Category:Wikipedians who have gone LALALALALALALLALALALALALAL. For whatever reason, I actually knew at some point that it was the same user; I remember I saw the sheet music uploaded by EE for Cool (song) and asked Velten about it. And yet for whatever reason I was under the impression that EE had left...I think I'm just losing my mind too. Actually though, I put Hollaback Girl up at WP:FAC in case you'd like to review it. ShadowHalo 04:24, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
re: Play with Fire (song)
Done. It hit #31 on 12/23 and looks like it didn't get any higher. Strange that it isn't on her history page. Maybe the .com search page only does the top 20 or something? Anyhoo, it's fixed. - eo 19:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Message
You need to understand something: I am tired of associating with you, and you are now more than evidently getting in my way of editing, likely to institute blocks for a period of time for your own entertainment. As you've been told several times before, you don't own articles, so stop treating them — Nelly Furtado ones in particular — as if they are. You're not being inconspicuous and I'm particularly sick of having to go through this process because of your intolerable antics. Therefore, stop reverting good-faith edits for the sake of labelling them as "harassment" for your own blocking-humor. Velten 15:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Though I'm not sure that a complete revert was necessary, I must say I'm concerned about this edit, which states that it was at #1 on 12/15 when the reference right there states that it was at #9. ShadowHalo 04:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with everything Velten had to say. Nothing I want to add, or take away. By far, you are one of the worst editors in th encyclopedia. As it was said, you do not own articles. Stop taking important useful encyclopedia meterial away. My problem is with your revertions in the Carrie Underwood - "Some Hearts" page. 21:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)