Misplaced Pages

Law review: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:09, 19 February 2005 editRiffsyphon1024 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,636 edits {{subst:vfd}}← Previous edit Revision as of 03:48, 20 February 2005 edit undo65.2.105.188 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
A law review is a scholarly journal focusing on legal issues, published by an organization of students at a ]. Law review articles are typically written by law professors, legal practitioners, and judges although many law reviews also publish shorter articles written by students, called 'notes' or 'comments.' Submissions are typically required to be cite-edited in the ] format, which is itself a collaborative product of four law reviews.
<div class="boilerplate metadata" id="vfd" style="background-color: #FFFCE6; margin: 0 2.5%; padding: 0 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa;">
'''] in accordance with the ]]


Almost every American law school has at least one law review, and the oldest and most prestigious law schools tend to have several. Generally, one such journal will be unlimited as to the scope of legal issues addressed therein, and the rest will focus on issues in a specific area, such as ], ], or ].
This request is being discussed to form a consensus whether this is, or could be, an article appropriate for Misplaced Pages. Please see ''']''' on the ] page for details. Also see ]. If you feel deletion is not justified by Misplaced Pages ] you may vote against its deletion. Please do not remove this notice or blank this page while the question is being considered. However, you are welcome to continue editing this article and improve it, especially if you can address the concerns of those who believe the article should be deleted. Should you improve the article and address the concerns of those who believe the article should be deleted, please remark on ''']''' regarding its improvement.
</div >
]


Among the oldest and most storied law review publications are the ] and the ]. As law professor Erwin N. Griswold wrote of the Harvard Law Review: "Some people are concerned that a major legal periodical in the United States is edited and managed by students. It is an unusual situation, but it started that way, and it developed mightily from its own strength."
A law review is a scholarly journal produced by an organization of students in a ].

Erwin N. Griswold, The Harvard Law Review - Glimpses of Its History as Seen by an Aficionado (1987), available at http://www.harvardlawreview.org/Centennial.shtml.

Student invitation to membership in the law review is by no means automatic. Students who have completed the first year of law school are usually selected to serve on the law review based on their grades (referred to as a 'grade-on' system), their performance in a scholastic contest known as a write-on competition, or some combination of these elements. A write-on competition usually requires all applicants to write an article of a pre-set length about a specific topic - usually a recent ] decision. The competition will typically be graded blindly, with submissions identified only by a number which the graders will not be able to connect to a particular applicant.

Once selected to the law review, students will generally be required to write an article of publishable quality (although it need not actually be published), and to thoroughly edit articles submitted to the law review from outside sources. Because of the intense experience gained in the process of this endeavor, law review participation is frequently a key factor among judges and firms looking to hire law school students upon their graduation.

Revision as of 03:48, 20 February 2005

A law review is a scholarly journal focusing on legal issues, published by an organization of students at a law school. Law review articles are typically written by law professors, legal practitioners, and judges although many law reviews also publish shorter articles written by students, called 'notes' or 'comments.' Submissions are typically required to be cite-edited in the bluebook format, which is itself a collaborative product of four law reviews.

Almost every American law school has at least one law review, and the oldest and most prestigious law schools tend to have several. Generally, one such journal will be unlimited as to the scope of legal issues addressed therein, and the rest will focus on issues in a specific area, such as international law, environmental law, or human rights.

Among the oldest and most storied law review publications are the Harvard Law Review and the Columbia Law Review. As law professor Erwin N. Griswold wrote of the Harvard Law Review: "Some people are concerned that a major legal periodical in the United States is edited and managed by students. It is an unusual situation, but it started that way, and it developed mightily from its own strength."

Erwin N. Griswold, The Harvard Law Review - Glimpses of Its History as Seen by an Aficionado (1987), available at http://www.harvardlawreview.org/Centennial.shtml.

Student invitation to membership in the law review is by no means automatic. Students who have completed the first year of law school are usually selected to serve on the law review based on their grades (referred to as a 'grade-on' system), their performance in a scholastic contest known as a write-on competition, or some combination of these elements. A write-on competition usually requires all applicants to write an article of a pre-set length about a specific topic - usually a recent Supreme Court decision. The competition will typically be graded blindly, with submissions identified only by a number which the graders will not be able to connect to a particular applicant.

Once selected to the law review, students will generally be required to write an article of publishable quality (although it need not actually be published), and to thoroughly edit articles submitted to the law review from outside sources. Because of the intense experience gained in the process of this endeavor, law review participation is frequently a key factor among judges and firms looking to hire law school students upon their graduation.