| Revision as of 22:28, 26 August 2021 editDawgDeputy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,937 editsmNo edit summaryTag: Undo← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:13, 8 October 2021 edit undoAldezD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,816 edits →Whew: new sectionTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| Why are you {{Diff|Monopoly (game show)|prev|1032517751|reverting my edits|diffonly=yes}} and then {{Diff|Monopoly (game show)|1032517826|1032517751|reverting back|diffonly=yes}} to the language I originally used? ] (]) 13:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC) | Why are you {{Diff|Monopoly (game show)|prev|1032517751|reverting my edits|diffonly=yes}} and then {{Diff|Monopoly (game show)|1032517826|1032517751|reverting back|diffonly=yes}} to the language I originally used? ] (]) 13:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC) | ||
| :Simply reverting takes up much less time. I have too much on my plate already. ] (]) 20:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC) | :Simply reverting takes up much less time. I have too much on my plate already. ] (]) 20:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == Whew == | |||
| Stop your long-term pattern of disruptive editing. The link contains source that Martindale is representing the creators. ] (]) 13:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:13, 8 October 2021
 Archives |
Your ANI report
Hi - just following up on the ANI report. I've asked the other editor on their talk page not to be so in your face with warning templates, and to explain their thinking rather than edit warring; I hope you don't mind if I follow up with a couple of pointers for you too? Basically, Misplaced Pages articles should ideally be based around what independent, reliable sources say about a subject. I know if sounds a bit crazy to call 'watching a gameshow' original research, but if you're figuring out the rules by watching the show, that's what you're doing - you're watching what happens, interpreting how the game works, and then writing your interpretation up here - we don't do that. My usual advice to editors is that if you can't find it in an independent, reliable source, leave it out of the article - it doesn't belong. So, yeah - I can see why they reverted you, but they didn't go about it in a very collegiate way. Hope this makes sense, let me know if you have any questions. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 17:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Makes perfect sense. DawgDeputy (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Recent edits
Why are you reverting my edits and then reverting back to the language I originally used? AldezD (talk) 13:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
- Simply reverting takes up much less time. I have too much on my plate already. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:04, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
Whew
Stop your long-term pattern of disruptive editing. The link contains source that Martindale is representing the creators. AldezD (talk) 13:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)