Revision as of 10:37, 12 October 2021 editTrangaBellam (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,563 edits →Barman (2014): new sectionTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:38, 12 October 2021 edit undoTrangaBellam (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,563 edits -; mis-pasteTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{talkquote|In the pre-colonial literatures (such as Brihatdharma Purana, Brahmabaibartya Purana, Sibayan of Rameswar Bhattacharya and Annadamangal of Bharat Chandra Ray) the Poundras were classified as almost untouchable (as antaja, asatsudra, adhamsankara, etc).|source={{Cite journal|last=Barman|first=Rup Kumar|date=2014-01-01|title=From Pods to Poundra: A Study on the Poundra Kshatriya Movement for Social Justice 1891–1956|url=https://doi.org/10.1177/0974354520140108|journal=Voice of Dalit|language=en|volume=7|issue=1|pages=121–138|doi=10.1177/0974354520140108|issn=0974-3545}}}} | {{talkquote|In the pre-colonial literatures (such as Brihatdharma Purana, Brahmabaibartya Purana, Sibayan of Rameswar Bhattacharya and Annadamangal of Bharat Chandra Ray) the Poundras were classified as almost untouchable (as antaja, asatsudra, adhamsankara, etc).|source={{Cite journal|last=Barman|first=Rup Kumar|date=2014-01-01|title=From Pods to Poundra: A Study on the Poundra Kshatriya Movement for Social Justice 1891–1956|url=https://doi.org/10.1177/0974354520140108|journal=Voice of Dalit|language=en|volume=7|issue=1|pages=121–138|doi=10.1177/0974354520140108|issn=0974-3545}}}} | ||
So many issues in a single line: | So many issues in a single line: | ||
# Asatsudra did not mean untouchable in Brh. P. That would make half of the Uttam Sankaras, untouchable |
# Asatsudra did not mean {{tq|almost untouchable}} in Brh. P. That would make half of the Uttam Sankaras, untouchable. | ||
:# Now, it might be that Antajas were practically indistinguishable from Mlechhas but we have no way to be aware of the situation on ground. | |||
] (]) 10:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC) | ] (]) 10:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:38, 12 October 2021
India: West Bengal Stub‑class | ||||||||||||||||
|
Barman (2014)
In the pre-colonial literatures (such as Brihatdharma Purana, Brahmabaibartya Purana, Sibayan of Rameswar Bhattacharya and Annadamangal of Bharat Chandra Ray) the Poundras were classified as almost untouchable (as antaja, asatsudra, adhamsankara, etc).
— Barman, Rup Kumar (2014-01-01). "From Pods to Poundra: A Study on the Poundra Kshatriya Movement for Social Justice 1891–1956". Voice of Dalit. 7 (1): 121–138. doi:10.1177/0974354520140108. ISSN 0974-3545.
So many issues in a single line:
- Asatsudra did not mean
almost untouchable
in Brh. P. That would make half of the Uttam Sankaras, untouchable.
TrangaBellam (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Categories: