Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 17:48, 27 October 2021 editZzuuzz (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators136,853 editsm Reverted edits by 27.55.81.90 (talk) to last version by Lowercase sigmabot IIITag: Rollback ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:53, 1 November 2021 edit undoFerahgo the Assassin (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users3,664 edits →Requesting feedback from CaptainEek and Barkeep49: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile editNext edit →
Line 11:		Line 11:
	}}		}}
	{{pb}}		{{pb}}

			== Requesting feedback from CaptainEek and Barkeep49 ==

			In {{U\|DGG}}'s , {{U\|CaptainEek}} and {{U\|Barkeep49}} both said that they were going to look into the issue of editors misrepresenting sources (and the persistent inability of talk pages and noticeboards to resolve that issue), and have a discussion about how it could be addressed. However, the amendment request was closed by the clerks before that discussion could happen.

			Could either of you please clarify the status of that planned discussion, and how you think this issue ought to be addressed? As I said in my last comment there, if someone is going to request another amendment or a full case, I think first there needs to be more clarity about what Arbcom considers to be within their remit in this respect, and which case (Fringe science or Race and intelligence) it should be filed under. -] (]) 14:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:53, 1 November 2021

Use this page to discuss information on the page (and subpages) attached to this one. This includes limited discussion of the Arbitration Committee itself, as a body. Some things belong on other pages:

requesting arbitration: WP:A/R
discussing finalised decisions of the committee: WT:ACN
discussing pending decisions: find the proceedings page at Template:Casenav
discussing the process of arbitration: WT:A/R

Shortcuts

This Arbitration Committee has been mentioned by a media organization:

Ramey, Corinne (May 7, 2018). "The 15 People Who Keep Misplaced Pages's Editors From Killing Each Other". Wall Street Journal.

Misplaced Pages Arbitration

About arbitration Talk Arbitration policy (CU/OS) Guide to arbitration Noticeboard + Talk Search archived proceedings Ban appeals Report
Open proceedings All open requests Case requests Clarification and Amendment requests Arbitrator motion requests Enforcement requests
Active sanctions Contentious topics (Log) General sanctions Editor sanctions
Arbitration Committee Discuss + Contact Members Procedures Elections Talk History Clerks + Talk Clerk procedures Conflict of interest reports
Audit Talk Statistics Talk Reports (pre-2016)

Track related changes
v t e

WT:AC Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Requesting feedback from CaptainEek and Barkeep49

In DGG's recently closed amendment request, CaptainEek and Barkeep49 both said that they were going to look into the issue of editors misrepresenting sources (and the persistent inability of talk pages and noticeboards to resolve that issue), and have a discussion about how it could be addressed. However, the amendment request was closed by the clerks before that discussion could happen.

Could either of you please clarify the status of that planned discussion, and how you think this issue ought to be addressed? As I said in my last comment there, if someone is going to request another amendment or a full case, I think first there needs to be more clarity about what Arbcom considers to be within their remit in this respect, and which case (Fringe science or Race and intelligence) it should be filed under. -Ferahgo the Assassin (talk) 14:53, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:

Misplaced Pages pages referenced by the press