| Revision as of 15:52, 5 August 2021 editMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWB← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:04, 4 November 2021 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| '''Delete'''. The {{tl|prod}} was removed, so next step is AfD. My reason is non-notability, as well as no returns on Google. - <strong |
'''Delete'''. The {{tl|prod}} was removed, so next step is AfD. My reason is non-notability, as well as no returns on Google. - ]] 02:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per nom. — ] <sup>() (])</sup> 02:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per nom. — ] <sup>() (])</sup> 02:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:04, 4 November 2021
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Delete CSD A7. kingboyk 23:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
13-14
Delete. The {{prod}} was removed, so next step is AfD. My reason is non-notability, as well as no returns on Google. - CorbinSimpson 02:44, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — ApolloCreed 02:47, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, no real assertion of notability. Royboycrashfan
02:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete nn bio --Grocer 03:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. —-- That Guy, From That Show! 2006-03-06 08:46Z
- Delete NN.!
VirtualSteve 10:48, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as nn. --Terence Ong 11:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. BrandNewGangCruft eh? Outrageous. Deizio 12:19, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. per above -- Alpha269 14:41, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Siva1979 14:53, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete It was started.... Yesterday? --Bachrach44 19:24, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: The author has been blanking and editing the page against the AfD policy. My guess is that he's trying to undo or delete the page himself (assuming good faith...). I have tried to keep the page's original content up there by reverting his blankings...the community should be able to see what they're agreeing to delete. - CorbinSimpson 20:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Isn't that a criterion for speedy delete? See: --Grocer 01:49, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per well argued nomination. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 21:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, doesn't assert importance or notability. --Allen 22:48, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! 19:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.