Talk:Axie Infinity: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:27, 8 December 2021 editGuyinblack25 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,287 edits Reassessed. Good improvements, but more quality content and information is needed to be assessed higherTag: Manual revert ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:19, 10 December 2021 edit undoGrayfell (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers83,010 edits →Reliability of sources: new sectionNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject Video games\|class=stub\|importance=low}}		{{WikiProject Video games\|class=stub\|importance=low}}

			== Reliability of sources ==

			{{ping\|Nintendoswitchfan}} Hello. Please cite reliable ] for any information that it not routine and could be seen as promotional. It is not enough for this info to be technically true, it has to be encyclopedicially significant, and the way to show this is with an independent source that explains why it's significant. This is the standard across Misplaced Pages.

			Axie Infinity's Medium account hasn't been updated in over a year, and it's not clear if this is even ], but it certainly isn't independent. Using primary sources for specific features of a video game can be construed as promotional, and since Misplaced Pages is not a platform for promotion, it is always better to summarize based on independent sources. ] can be used for routine information, or in some other cases, but always with caution. Thanks. ] (]) 20:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:19, 10 December 2021

Video games Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Pokémon: The Electric Tale of Pikachu (0 participants)
Evernight Games (0 participants)
Pokémon Home (2 participants)
List of Pokémon volumes (1 participant)
Gameplay of Pokémon (7 participants)
Lisette Titre-Montgomery (6 participants)
Party royale game (3 participants)
List of Minecraft characters (7 participants)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants; relisted)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants; relisted)
Red Barrels (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Reliability of sources

@Nintendoswitchfan: Hello. Please cite reliable independent sources for any information that it not routine and could be seen as promotional. It is not enough for this info to be technically true, it has to be encyclopedicially significant, and the way to show this is with an independent source that explains why it's significant. This is the standard across Misplaced Pages.

Axie Infinity's Medium account hasn't been updated in over a year, and it's not clear if this is even WP:RS, but it certainly isn't independent. Using primary sources for specific features of a video game can be construed as promotional, and since Misplaced Pages is not a platform for promotion, it is always better to summarize based on independent sources. Primary sources can be used for routine information, or in some other cases, but always with caution. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 20:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Categories:

Revision as of 16:27, 8 December 2021 editGuyinblack25 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,287 edits Reassessed. Good improvements, but more quality content and information is needed to be assessed higherTag: Manual revert ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:19, 10 December 2021 edit undoGrayfell (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers83,010 edits →Reliability of sources: new sectionNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject Video games\|class=stub\|importance=low}}		{{WikiProject Video games\|class=stub\|importance=low}}

			== Reliability of sources ==

			{{ping\|Nintendoswitchfan}} Hello. Please cite reliable ] for any information that it not routine and could be seen as promotional. It is not enough for this info to be technically true, it has to be encyclopedicially significant, and the way to show this is with an independent source that explains why it's significant. This is the standard across Misplaced Pages.

			Axie Infinity's Medium account hasn't been updated in over a year, and it's not clear if this is even ], but it certainly isn't independent. Using primary sources for specific features of a video game can be construed as promotional, and since Misplaced Pages is not a platform for promotion, it is always better to summarize based on independent sources. ] can be used for routine information, or in some other cases, but always with caution. Thanks. ] (]) 20:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)