Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
please provide sources that are recent and prove your claims, source number 49 is 6 years old and never states them to be a commonn form of transport, source number 50 is an unavailable link and source 51 never states or support the claim that it is a common form of transportation, it actually refrences bicitaxis being almost eliminated and says there are trying to come back after many years of being on the decline—] (]) 02:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
please provide sources that are recent and prove your claims, source number 49 is 6 years old and never states them to be a common form of transport, source number 50 is an unavailable link and source 51 never states or support the claim that it is a common form of transportation, it actually refrences bicitaxis being almost eliminated and says there are trying to come back after many years of being on the decline—] (]) 02:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
Hello, Tbhotch! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! fetchcomms04:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
i mean, he added second logo / caption at the bottom and without space (=), also sentence mentioning pandemic-new name lacks linking and got grammar error.
You can request them about the change at their talk page. I merely added a template to the page. I don't know anything about that league. (CC)Tbhotch23:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
it is technical part, not needed league knowledge. i did it already and didnt listen. so hoping users who protected can fix before opened again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.180.101 (talk) 23:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
If this is your comment, it is a vague comment (which logo, which league, where's the WP:vandalism). And I say that I don't know about that league because it starts with: "The I-League 2nd Division (or Hero I-League 2nd Division for sponsorship reasons)", so both logos are technically correct. What's not correct is that both are placed in the infobox, but then again, I don't know which logo should be moved down. So that's why I would say that you ask them explicitly and with clarity what you want them to do. (CC)Tbhotch00:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
i meant maybe you usually fix GRAMMAR errors (both infobox and text have some), made by arnab who doesnt understand and i cant fix while locked. part of pandemic and infobox ORDER. anyway thanks, will get solution. (always better block instead of lock in such cases.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.0.180.101 (talk) 01:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
On 14 August 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Monumento al perro callejero, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Peluso implores your help? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Monumento al perro callejero. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Monumento al perro callejero), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
it was a pleasure to help clean up the english on the 'peluso' page. i've spent a lot of time in mexico and having grown up in the states it often saddens me to see how cruel people can be to stray dogs in la república, so thank you for getting the article into 'did you know'.
i often find myself fixing typos in DYK articles, and it would of course be better to fix them before they went up: if you want to pass any to me before they go up please do. i will attempt to create a talk page for myself as i imagine it would facilitate communicating with me. thanks again,--Potholehotline (talk) 22:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Not neutral?
Just wondering how stating a fact, "Italy are the reigning European Champions" is not neutral POV. They won Euro 2020, which makes them the reigning champions at least until Euro 2024 (if they don't win that competition). Moreover, the France national team are described as "reigning world champions" in their article. What's the difference?
If anything, refusing this language, which is both neutral on its face and neutral in fact, and is indeed a fact, is not neutral POV. Do I really need to cite a source saying that Italy are reigning European Champions even though there are several sources cited in the same article that state that Italy won Euro 2020? Do I need to point out the plethora of news sources that described Portugal as the "reigning European champions" going into Euro 2020? I mean if that's your issue, I'm happy to add a source stating that Italy are the reigning European champions. Otherwise, I don't understand your reversion at all.
In fact, I've gone ahead and readded the language, but citing to a reliable, neutral source which states that: "Italy will go as reigning European champions". Neutral POV from a reliable, cited source (CBS Sports). Take a look at it if you like, but it's there. 24.178.111.153 (talk) 14:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
On 25 September 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tlalli, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Tlalli will replace a monument to Christopher Columbus, not to "erase history", but to "deliver social justice"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tlalli. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tlalli), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
If you're aware of any helpful sources with artist/date info for expanding entries about the artworks mentioned at List of public art in Guadalajara, please let me know! Another editor dislikes that I've created these unsourced stubs based on the Commons categories, so any help is much appreciated. Thanks, ---Another Believer(Talk)18:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Great! Looking forward to collaborating. I've already been following to archive sources and make other minor improvements. Thanks for helping, ---Another Believer(Talk)14:56, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Also, not really sure what's up with the editor re: Tlalli and the roundabout. (shrugs) Great work on these articles, I hope you're able to promote them to Good article status once the fate of Tlalli and the roundabout are determined! ---Another Believer(Talk)22:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Tlalli is deliberately incomplete. I merely added the most relevant info that the DYK required. I haven't included the public and artistic reception ("the Wakanda monument"), as I'm still waiting for its installation or its official cancellation to complete the article. If it is canceled (for me as a writer) is the best thing that could happen as I will not have to write more information and it will be stable. (CC)Tbhotch22:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hi, those red links are supposed to go to the Spanish language pages for those subjects, but are marked up wrong. Easily corrected for sure, but I don't immediately know how. Hesperian Nguyen (talk) 02:52, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
On 21 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Polanco metro station, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the giant piano-shaped staircase (pictured) at Polanco metro station is fully interactive? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Polanco metro station. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Polanco metro station), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
I don't collaborate with the AFC process. You have to click the "Finish drafting?" button and follow the instructions. (CC)Tbhotch01:12, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Two lighthouses in Puerto Vallarta
Hi again! Curious if you think the lighthouses Faro de Matamoros and Faro del Malecón in Puerto Vallarta should have articles? I would think so, but I'm not seeing much English-language sourcing. Would you be willing to do a quick search for Spanish-language sourcing? Thanks either way! ---Another Believer(Talk)21:45, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
@Another Believer: I found a few sources. They seem to be beacons rather than lighthouses—although they are colloquially known as such. The one pictured seems to be a leading lights beacon, while the one at Matamoros Street (and apparently there is another somewhere else) is a "situational" (literal translation) beacon. (CC)Tbhotch01:29, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
I feel like we can only describe the structures as sources allow. If you're willing to link to some sources, I can try to get a sense of how much coverage each has received and attempt some English translations, if applicable, or at least share with WikiProject Lighthouses. ---Another Believer(Talk)03:14, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Porsche logotype.png
Thank you for uploading File:Porsche logotype.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Misplaced Pages may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Misplaced Pages:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
Curious if you might have any insight into the question I've asked at Talk:The Fisherman (sculpture). I found a few sources about the sculpture, but they have a different location than where I just saw this sculpture on my walk. If not, no worries, just thought I'd ask. Thanks! ---Another Believer(Talk)20:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
On 3 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Young Woman of Amajac, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a group of farmers discovered The Young Woman of Amajac while preparing to till a citrus field? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Young Woman of Amajac. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Young Woman of Amajac), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hello! I was strolling around Isla Cuale and came across the Monumento Espacio Tiempo y Movimiento, an interesting sculpture. I can find some pictures online, but not a lot of sources with more information. Are you open to doing a search to determine if there should be a Misplaced Pages article based on English- and/or Spanish-language sourcing? ---Another Believer(Talk)16:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Excuse me I don't get why I can't post this image. I found this image and thought it was nice to use in the article please let me use it. Have a nice day.
Something odd
The template for contents of the article is deleted in a lot of articles, i don't know why, hence my frenetic activity of reversing last edits, wich seems to fix the problem.
No, i am aware of the hide function, it's not that, the template disappeared entirely on some articles, not all, for me at least, but no it's not the hide function.
Thanks for confirming. Can you find much about the statue at Plaza Hidalgo? ---Another Believer(Talk) 23:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Sorry, replied to the notification ping before seeing your update to Plaza Hidalgo. Thanks again! ---Another Believer(Talk)23:21, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Hey there Tbhotch. Just wanted to let you know that I created a category for LGBT Latin musicians and thought you might want to know. I already included Raymix on the category and left a note on the category's talk page for sources of Latin artists who identify as LGBT. Erick (talk) 02:00, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Gaudelia Díaz
On 16 November 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gaudelia Díaz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after Gaudelia Díaz won a bronze medal at the 1992 Paralympics, she was asked to join Televisa by its CEO? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gaudelia Díaz. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gaudelia Díaz), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
@Another Believer: At the moment I'm only focusing on the CDMX Metro (because there are around 170 stations and I've only written like 20 articles). I tried looking for those of the Xochimilco Light Rail system, which also lack individual articles that exist in other wikis like .es and .pt. However, I couldn't find real information about them and the external versions are merely about the stations' locations. For the one in Guadalajara, if you read Refugio railway station and Juárez railway station you will see that they don't meet the WP:GNG criteria. However (again), I've seen several stations from multiple systems around the world that look like that. Maybe some are notables, maybe some others are not, I can't tell if they would survive an AFD. Even some of the CDMX Metro were redirects at some point due to the lack of sources. (CC)Tbhotch03:06, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Very helpful, thanks! So I'm not bugging you on your talk page so often, I hope you have WikiProject Mexico on your watchlist so you can see when I've created new entries. You've been so helpful adding more info to new stubs, thanks again! ---Another Believer(Talk)03:11, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
@Another Believer: There's no problem. For WP:Mex, I think the project is inactive. It's not tagged as such because it still receiving messages and replies, but the members are inactive. (CC)Tbhotch03:21, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
I see. Well, I hope you're able to check in on the new stubs being created when you have time. I am loving Guadalajara and have also visited Tlaquepaque and Zapopan. Happy editing! ---Another Believer(Talk)03:28, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Provisionally, yes, as it is the sole topic. However there is another one in Mexico City and the concept itself is the primary topic. (CC)Tbhotch01:27, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
Also, I'm hoping you can create an article for the red bench in Guadalajara if there's enough sourcing. I see the bench is still installed next to the rotunda. ---Another Believer(Talk)16:14, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
I was thinking to create a super DYK for March 8, like "did you know that antimonumentas in Mexico, like W, X, Y and Z are erected to demand justice for the victims of gender violence and femicides in the country?" or something appropriate for these cases. (CC)Tbhotch01:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Would be great to see a DYK hook about this list on the Main page. I'm trying to learn more about the red bench in Guadalajara, but I'm not finding much by searching "Banca Roja". I'll assume this is not an official title, like the list's Notes section suggests, but I'm curious if you think there's enough coverage for a separate article. ---Another Believer(Talk)21:56, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Yes, there's enough content for them, even for the one thas was installed yesterday in Oaxaca City. As you might have seen with the WWF Roundabout, these are merged into the people's life and make them part of the city. I've even seen sources calling the Columbus Roundabout the WWF Roundabout. Once the Young Woman is installed, the roundabout will be readopted by the city, but the cultural impact is never removed. (CC)Tbhotch22:43, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
I'll create drafts instead, so I don't have to worry if someone AFD them. It's less stressing for me as readers are not affected by incompleteness. (CC)Tbhotch02:51, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for the review - I gave the pic a different license to clear up the doubt and I took the opportunity to add a couple more. Could you reconsider the doubt on the license. Fine if you are still unsure. Cheers. Victuallers (talk) 09:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for taking a look at the Centro template. The public art template has a few more entries, if you're able to do the same. Happy editing! ---Another Believer(Talk)15:17, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Food labeling in Mexico
On 9 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Food labeling in Mexico, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an investigation found that most Mexican nutrition science students could not interpret a nutritional front-of-package labeling system correctly? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Food labeling in Mexico. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Food labeling in Mexico), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Bicitaxis in mexico city are not common at all, according to UVOtv the most common transportation is 45.2% buses, 24.7% personal car, 21.1% Metro, 12.7% walking, 4.8% Metrobús or Mexibús, 4.3% Taxi, 2.7% bike, 1.5% motorcycle, i see no reason to include bicitaxi as a common transportation method, there for i see no reason to keep this information upKaidros (talk) 01:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
bicitaxi
please provide sources that are recent and prove your claims, source number 49 is 6 years old and never states them to be a common form of transport, source number 50 is an unavailable link and source 51 never states or support the claim that it is a common form of transportation, it actually refrences bicitaxis being almost eliminated and says there are trying to come back after many years of being on the decline—Kaidros (talk) 02:09, 15 December 2021 (UTC)