Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 07:39, 15 December 2021

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

/Archive 1 - 2004-2005 /Archive 2 - 2006 /Archive 3 - 2007 /Archive 4 - 2008 /Archive 5 - 2009 /Archive 6 - 2010 /Archive 7 - 2011 /Archive 8 - 2012-2014 /Archive 9 - 2015-2016 /Archive 10 - 2017-2019

This user is one of the 400 most active English Wikipedians of all time.

Germany part of the Spanish Empire?

Since you are on thewikiproject Germany, i wanted to ask you something. One user has created several maps which basically hint that Germany was part of the Spanish Empire because Charles V was both King of Spain and Emperor of Germany. I find it absurd and I have also found many other mistakes. See File talk:Imperio Español Completo.svg on wikicommons. Barjimoa (talk) 15:15, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

I see you and Nagihuin have more or less reached an agreement, and the Holy Roman Empire is out of the map. There's (at least) one error left: the Northern Netherlands gained independence from Spain in 1648 (Treaty of Münster), not 1713 (Treaty of Utrecht). Markussep 21:18, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

Streams

Good to see you're going through the German rivers. Badly need work. If you want me to db author any compile a list and I'll do them all in one go rather than template me individually. OK?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:31, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

OK, I'll let you know when I find some more! Markussep 12:33, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Naming of French railway station articles

There is a proposal at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/France_and_French-related_articles#Naming_of_French_railway_station_articles where your input would be helpful. Colonies Chris (talk) 20:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Name of Hauts-de-France region

Hi, I'm the guy who made a recent edit to Hauts-de-France regarding the Dutch/Flemish exonym for that region. Part of my motive for putting that name next to the official name was to acknowledge the historical presence of the Dutch language and culture in present-day northern France, partially in light of French linguistic and cultural oppression of dutch-speaking peoples, particularly during the middle ages. That said, I could also be missing something here. I also saw that the French regions bordering Germany and Italy, among other places, had exonyms for those regions in their respective languages; therefore, I thought, why not the Dutch name for that bordering region? I hope this all makes sense.

In any case, I just thought it was worth explaining my previous edits and the motives behind them.

Thank you for listening, and please let me know what input you might have in regards to this page and other related topics. Wiscipidier (talk) 03:13, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Wiscipidier

Hi, my problem with "Opper-Frankrijk" is that it might be an accurate literal translation of the French name, but it's not used in the real world. I'm Dutch myself, and I have never heard or seen this before, unlike other Dutch exonyms like Elzas, Lotharingen, Normandië, Parijs, Rijsel, Duinkerke. See for instance these lists from the Taalunie, the official board for the Dutch language: http://namen.taalunie.org/land/fr and http://namen.taalunie.org/nederlandse-namen-voor-plaatsen-frans-vlaanderen . The region was created just a few years ago, that may explain why it's not there. I couldn't find "Opper-Frankrijk" on the websites of the neighbouring Flemish province https://www.west-vlaanderen.be or the Flemish city https://www.kortrijk.be either (that do mention "Hauts-de-France"). The Flemish government uses "Hauts-de-France", see https://www.fdfa.be/nl/hauts-de-france. If you look for "Opper-Frankrijk" in Google you only find Misplaced Pages and obvious clones. We should reflect actual usage, not invent it. There are better ways to show the Flemish heritage of the region. Markussep 08:11, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Carpathian mountains map

Hello, I have fixed your map but didn't want to upload it without your permission. You included a city, city of Vršac in Serbia, Voivodina as a part of the Transylvanian plateau which is a really old scientific classification. Officialy, it's the part of Serbo-Macedonian massif. I have it here: https://imgur.com/a/R0tteVX , and city of Vršac is on these coordinates 45.1201 21.3043. God bless you my man! Christ is risen! Kolikojerokoko (talk) 14:51, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I see you made a new version of File:Mapcarpat2.png. Actually, the Vršac Mountains weren't part of the Carpathians or the Transylvanian Plateau in my last version, they were added to the Romanian Western Carpathians by Olahus. I'm not an expert in geology, but apparently in some claasifications (see File:Divisions of the Carpathians.png) they're considered part of the Banat Mountains (D3 in the map). So maybe you should look for some literature to support your version. Markussep 18:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Drainage basin

Hey there, thanks for calling me out on that. I was under the impression that there was a discussion at WikiProject Rivers that was still running its course (pun unintended) that could impact the fate of the categories, so I closed it conservatively, although I should have taken into account the suggestion for CFDS for that specific instance. I have gone ahead and placed Category:Dnieper River system to Category:Dnieper basin at WP:CFDS, since that did seem to be generally agreed upon. bibliomaniac15 17:18, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

As a general piece of advice, in the future if there's a line that is discovered to be more applicable to a speedy instead, as a nom it may be better to strike it out and list it on CFDS instead. bibliomaniac15 19:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

OK, I didn't know I could do that! Markussep 08:21, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

German rivers

A lot of the German rivers are poorly sourced, even by German wiki standards and don't have many sources available in a search. We have stubs on small tributaries and even the parent rivers which are tributaries of more notable rivers are still short stubs. In looking I think we'd be better off having stubs on the larger ones and redirecting the smaller tributaries and simply listing them as tributaries and at least trying to write a few sourced paragraphs. Dill (river) for example we ought to have a detailed article on that and tributaries such as Aar (Dill) summarised within it. If we keep that separate, the German wikipedia article is detailed but poorly sourced so it's difficult to transwiki it and chase up the sourcing. I don't think we should have seperate articles on tributaries of the Aar too like Monzenbach (which I redirected). The granddad river needs writing properly first! I really think a great number of the German rivers should be redirected into a tributary list/summary in the larger rivers until they can be researched properly. It's difficult to find detailed sources on a lot of them.† Encyclopædius 10:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

I don't think stubbiness is a good criterion for redirecting an article, notability of the subject is more important, see WP:GEOLAND. I agree that not all rivers in Germany are notable, I cleaned up several of those myself. It's not so difficult to find sources for basic river data, also for the small ones like the Monzenbach, see for instance http://wrrl.hessen.de/mapapps/resources/apps/wrrl/index.html?lang=en , select "Gewässerthemen" in the "Themen" tab, and zoom in to Herborn. It's 4.5 km long apparently, but you already found that site, I see. If you search for "Monzenbach Aar Herborn" you'll find some more information, maybe not enough to call it notable. Actually I think that most of the rivers that have articles now are more or less notable, I already cleaned out the worst. Markussep 11:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

A lot of the ones under 20 km in length tend to not have the best sourcing available, even the German wiki articles are generally poorly sourced. I couldn't find anything other than mention in some books or on a map for a lot of them. Some of the ones under 10 km look like the stream in my local golf course. In an ideal world we'd have a full article on every stream in Germany but it makes no sense to me having a short stub if there isn't sourcing available to write a good article and if the parent river is still a stub and unsourced etc. Priority should be the more notable rivers first and then if somebody can be bothered ot fully expand those and find enough info to write an article on the tributaries then expand them. Even with what you could find to write about Monzenbach, I would be surprised if you could find more than could be comfortably be summarised in the Aar article.† Encyclopædius 11:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Well, if we just take the Monzenbach example again: the article had mouth coordinates and location, which didn't make it into the parent article. I'm not saying that's a big problem, but before you start redirecting a lot of articles, I think it's better to discuss it at WP:RIVERS and/or WP:GERMANY. Then we may find some nice criteria to prune out the non-notable streams. Markussep 13:39, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Rivers posted what I posted to you there. also alerted WP:Germany to it.† Encyclopædius 12:27, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your tireless contributions in the field of improving Greek railway stations. 🚂🚂🚂  The Emperor of Byzantium  (talk) 01:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC).

Nomination of Nohra, Thuringia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nohra, Thuringia is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Nohra, Thuringia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:31, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Hello! I would like to thank you for the time you are spending on wikipedia to improve the information. But, one of the pages you deleted was a transparent page, and I don't understand how can I move it from English Misplaced Pages to Romanian Misplaced Pages. Please do to me one more favor and help me. EusuntBabi (talk) 10:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry that i sent a remark message, but I'm struggling to understand how wikipedia works. After you edited, I saw that the page Mârzănești is posted on English Misplaced Pages. I did not knew that this is a problem. So, I want to move it on Romanian Misplaced Pages, but I don't know how to do this. Now I understand too why it is not good to post a Romanian text on an English language platform.I don't think that the Western World would like to hear about my small village in Romania :). — Preceding unsigned comment added by EusuntBabi (talk • contribs) 10:23, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

You copied the text from Romanian Misplaced Pages, didn't you? This ro:Comuna Mârzănești, Teleorman looks very much like what you added to the English Mârzănești article. Of course you can add text to the English article, but it should be in English ;-). And preferably with references. See Misplaced Pages:Contributing to Misplaced Pages for more information. Markussep 10:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

About the recent population of the districts and jamoats of Tajikistan

About the recent population of the districts and jamoats of Tajikistan, for instance, the former Ghonchi District (now Devashtich District) of Sughd Region, do you know any certain types of information if the jamoats have smaller division units within their territorial borders or jurisdiction; such as villages or townlets or neighborhoods or localities or settlements or communities or hamlets, etc.? Lemme know when you possibly can. jlog3000 (talk) 20:04, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

That would be nice information, but I haven't found a good source for that yet. Tajik Misplaced Pages lists villages within the jamoats (see for instance tg:Деҳоти Ғазантарак#Деҳоти ҷамоат, but there's no reference. Markussep 08:10, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Understandable. Sadly I don't speak or understand Tajik or its letters. But thanks for the references though. jlog3000 (talk) 14:56, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

A request for some article expansion support

Hello and Greetings

While working on Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları female slavery markets in Ottomans, I came across an Ottoman escapee slave "George of Hungary" His account of escape from slavery interests me. so I initiated a Draft:George of Hungary. Frankly I am not sure I can spare enough time alone for this particular article since I am focused on related larger scope project of Women , conflicts and conflict zones, So..

1) You seems to have earlier edited article Sebeș. I am looking for volunteering support in expansion and update of Draft:George of Hungary if the topic interests you and if you are unable to spare time for some reason may be you can help out by referring the article to others for expansion.

2) If you happen to come across any information on Ottoman women slavery by any chance at any point of time please do support Draft:Avret Esir Pazarları by updating the same.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 04:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I'm sorry but I can't help you with this, I have no information on the subject. Markussep 18:07, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Markussep

Hi Markussep, I removed the hatnote from Komsomolobod because I couldn't find an appropriate article to link it to. Darband is a disambiguation page and, assuming that you meant Darband, Tajikistan, there is no mention of Komsomolobod as a former name. If I have made a mistake, please let me know and I will fix it. Leschnei (talk) 13:52, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing that. You're right, I meant Darband, Tajikistan. I added the former name to that article, and a reference. Markussep 14:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Le Mont Dore

Hi, I reverted your unsourced edit, because I was unable to find a source which declared his victory, rather than that he was ahead in the second contest. Please find a WP:reliable source which states he is mayor, and support it with a WP:inline citation. Also note that saying he was in office through 2026 should be replaced by "2020-present". Thanks!--Quisqualis (talk) 18:13, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

I found a reference, "Répertoire national des élus: les maires". data.gouv.fr, Plateforme ouverte des données publiques françaises (in French). 2 December 2020. Retrieved 7 December 2020., and have added it. I don't quite agree with your "2020-present" proposal, since mayors in France are elected for a specific term: until the next local elections, that will take place in March 2026. Markussep 19:00, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the sourcing. Regarding 2026, Misplaced Pages does not predict the future, and people sometimes resign, are deposed or die in office. Unfortunately, as far as I know, the infobox is not equipped to tell us the term length, so we must read in the article to find that. (somebody tell the infobox authorities, svp)--Quisqualis (talk) 19:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

MOS:ORDER

I've just fixed ~170 German municipality pages which you've mostly started, or significantly contributed to, from 2006 to recently, and I've noticed a pattern of disregard for MOS:ORDER. Please ready it & try to follow it. Thanks.   ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  22:23, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, it would help me if you could be more specific about the errors you found. I have no intention of violating any guideline, and in some cases I wonder whether MOS:ORDER was that specific about the order of e.g. stub tags and categories at the time that I made the edits, back in 2006 or 2007. Markussep 07:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Map of Carpathians in svg format?

Hi, do you have this map in vector graphics (svg)? It could be very useful, e.g. for localization? Thanks. --Pavouk (talk) 11:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Sorry no, I made it in Paint. Markussep 11:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bonnieure

The article Bonnieure has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Couldn't find anything about this river, (other than the name and location). Fails WP:GEOLAND.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koridas 05:19, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Germany vehicle registrations

I noticed you removed the additional registration codes from the infobox that have been reactivated some years back due to a change in registration laws. I don't see an obvious technical reason for removal as the resulting output is not linked anywhere. Am I missing something? As a general rule the historic codes are available in all districts that inherited parts of the historic districts as long as the modern district makes that option available to vehicle owners. So I imagine that 99% of the infobox usage was correcty stating current codes. Agathoclea (talk) 09:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I removed some, especially from the Erzgebirgskreis (see e.g. this diff) since it was simply too much, and it doesn't make sense to me that someone from Marienberg (former Mittlerer Erzgebirgskreis, MEK) would choose a licence plate from a former district that Marienberg never was part of, like ANA, ASZ, AU, MAB, STL, SZB, ZP. If you don't agree, I can also leave them there. Markussep 09:50, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

It is rather silly, but that is how the rules work. It really took me a while to work out why Hof offers the Stadtsteinach plate, that was down to a hamlet that got merged away from its municipality at the time. Some people with multiple cars have been known to use the same letters/numbers but different prefixes. The question is in the end what each district allows, and I know that in places had been a contentious issue. People have been complaining in the more restrictive districts, especially if there where cars in the neighbouring district registered with a particular towns plate due to those border issues. But I have got no comprehensive overview of the final rulings. Agathoclea (talk) 10:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The France Barnstar of National Merit
		For your work on the Vestric-et-Candiac Page Randoperson1 (talk) 04:30, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LGV Perpignan-Figueres

Template:LGV Perpignan-Figueres has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 00:45, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Schlüsselconverter

Template:Schlüsselconverter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFX 19:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Arguenon

After reverting your change to the citation style in Arguenon I hesitate to revert your change to Arguenon where you re-added Category:Rivers of Brittany and Category:Rivers of France, but it seems to go against WP:SUBCAT and the general rule that pages are not placed in both a category and its subcategory. In this case, Category:Rivers of Côtes-d'Armor is a subcategory of Category:Rivers of Brittany, which is (indirectly) a subcategory of Category:Rivers of France. All the rivers in Côtes-d'Armor are, without any exceptions, rivers in Brittany and rivers in France. Adding the river to the parent categories clutters them up and is redundant. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, see the note at Category:Rivers of France that says "For convenience, all Rivers of France should be included in this category. This includes all the rivers that can also be found in the subcategories." Since there is no note like that at Category:Rivers of Brittany, one could argue for removing it from that category. In this case, Arguenon is only in three categories, so cluttering is a minor problem here. Markussep 16:32, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

I did not look at Category:Rivers of France, so did not see the hatnote. I see it was discussed inconclusively at Category talk:Rivers of France#Comments back in 2008. I was not thinking of clutter at the foot of the Arguenon article, but as clutter in Category:Rivers of Brittany and in Category:Rivers of France, which has 684 entries. When I look at Category:Rivers by country I do not see any consistency. Some like Category:Rivers of Russia or Category:Rivers of the United Kingdom are diffused by region, some like Category:Rivers of Kosovo are not, and some in Europe like Category:Rivers of Germany have rivers both in the main category and in regional subcategories. A mess. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:06, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

For me it's convenient to have all rivers of France in one category. I do appreciate consistency, but consistency among all hundreds of thousands of river articles may be a bit difficult to achieve. Markussep 19:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

I doubt that it would be impossible. I would divide countries into those that have few rivers, those that have many, and the ones in between. "Few" could be less than 20 or less than 5 per region, and "Many" could be more than 200 or more than 50 per region. Something like that. The "few" countries would have all the rivers in "category:Rivers of countryname"; the "many" countries would have no rivers in "category:Rivers of countryname", and the ones in between could be decided case by case. Most countries probably already follow rules like this, and working through the others standardizing them would just be a mundane job that would probably find and fix a lot of anomalies.

But the basic assumption is that enormous lists in "category:Rivers of countryname" should be avoided, and it would probably be impossible to gain consensus on that. Out of curiosity, what do you use Category:Rivers of France for? Aymatth2 (talk) 12:31, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

I use the Category:Rivers of France for maintenance, to check (with "Related changes") whether new articles have appeared, or whether articles have been vandalised. That would be more tedious to me if I have to check every regional category. I looked in the guideline for categories, but there are no definitions of "overpopulated" categories. Apparently, Rivers of France is treated as a category with non-diffusing subcategories. Markussep 13:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

You could maybe get a similar effect with a PetScan query like this one, which sorts by date/time last changed. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:58, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

That's an interesting option, but can I exclude my own edits? I couldn't find that option in the manual. Markussep 10:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

I don't think so. But it has the advantage of not needed to put the rivers into redundant categories so avoids inconsistencies like Falleron (river), Canal de Haute Perche, Acheneau, Counamama or Baztan (river). Again, I prefer to be minimalist with categories, but doubt it would be possible to get a consensus on that. Aymatth2 (talk) 11:53, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

The French wiki takes a minimalist approach with w:fr:Catégorie:Cours d'eau en France. Petscan shows articles for 4,272 watercourses. Maybe someone will set themselves the task of translating them. I only did Arguenon because it was mentioned in another article I started, but there is something peaceful and uncontroversial about articles on rivers... Aymatth2 (talk) 12:29, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

@Aymatth2: I think a general category for Rivers of France is fine for navigation if there's sub cats too, though there are some awkward ones. The important thing is that you're expanding our coverage of Corsica, which is much appreciated, I'm sure Markussep will agree.₪ Encyclopædius 17:55, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Linking via pipes and redirects

Hi, thanks for your contributions to towns, regions, and geographic features of France. Just to save you a lot of unnecessary edits, there's no need to retarget a link via a pipe to the actual page title that is already working via a redirect, and there are usually good reasons to keep the redirect as is; these are explained at WP:NOPIPE. This is especially so when the page title contains parenthetical disambiguation; one almost never wants to see the parenthetical part in the rendered page. The converse situation, is explained at WP:NOTBROKEN, which concerns links that are already working and point to the correct target page. There is rarely a reason to "fix" these links. Thanks, and happy editing! Mathglot (talk) 17:04, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Just noticed your revert at Departments of France, with the summary, rvt, there are more rivers named Nièvre. If Misplaced Pages has articles on more than one river named Nièvre, then the redirect Nièvre (river) should not be targeted at a single page title, and should be turned into a disambig page instead. Do you know how to do that? If not, I can do it if you prefer, if you let me know what the page title of the "other" river with this name is. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 17:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

I guess you're right it's not very useful to replace redirects, I'll give it a break. About Nièvre, the other river is a tributary of the Somme, see fr:Nièvre (affluent de la Somme). There's no article about that one in English wikipedia yet, once that's created we could make a disambiguation page for the rivers and the department. Markussep 20:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

I wonder if it's worth creating a redirect with possibilities to Somme (river), and then we'd have enough to create the disambig page? The only thing is, if we created the redirect, then we'd have to use it someplace, maybe on the page itself as a circular redirect. Mathglot (talk) 00:28, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

I created Nièvre (Somme) and Nièvre (disambiguation), and redirected Nièvre (river) and similar pages to the disambiguation page. I checked the links to Nièvre (Loire), they all seem to be correct. Markussep 09:31, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi

how are you User:Markussep, can you review this Article, and User:İstanbul haberleri 2020/sandbox thank you so much — Preceding undated comment added 11:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Sorry no, I can't read Turkish. Markussep 11:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Note above account is locked globally as long term abuser (LTA), for more please see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/علي أبو عمر/Archive. Best --Alaa :)..! 11:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help cleanup. Thanks you. Guoimd (talk) 07:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)