| Revision as of 16:51, 27 December 2021 editTheEagle107 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,358 edits →December 2021: new sectionTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:00, 28 December 2021 edit undoShadowwarrior8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,897 edits →December 2021Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile editNext edit → | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| ] ]. We appreciate ], but in one of your recent edits to ], it appears that you have added ], which is against Misplaced Pages's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses ]. Please be prepared to cite a ] for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-nor1 -->--] (]) 16:51, 27 December 2021 (UTC) | ] ]. We appreciate ], but in one of your recent edits to ], it appears that you have added ], which is against Misplaced Pages's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses ]. Please be prepared to cite a ] for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-nor1 -->--] (]) 16:51, 27 December 2021 (UTC) | ||
| Hello, ] I did not ]. | |||
| The source I quoted was "Islamic Theology:Traditionalism and Rationalism" by B. Abrahamov ISBN - 0-7486-1102-9 . Chapter 3: Traditionalism against Rationalism Sub-Section: The Traditionalists' Criticism of the Use of Rational Methods & The Attitude towards the Kalam and the Mutakallimun. | |||
| The section clearly lists ] as part of theologians of the ] ( Athari ) camp and hence why I added the reference as such along with the sub-section. The citation was simply a addendum which elaborated his opposition to Kalam. To accuse multiple times; of other editors engaging in ] without proof is quite ]; but I do hope you were unaware of the details. | |||
| Thank you. | |||
| ] (]) 16:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:00, 28 December 2021
Welcome!
Hello, Shadowwarrior8, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Toddy1 (talk) 17:45, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Al-Shafi'i, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Misplaced Pages's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you.--TheEagle107 (talk) 16:51, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, TheEagle107 I did not combine published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say.
The source I quoted was "Islamic Theology:Traditionalism and Rationalism" by B. Abrahamov ISBN - 0-7486-1102-9 . Chapter 3: Traditionalism against Rationalism Sub-Section: The Traditionalists' Criticism of the Use of Rational Methods & The Attitude towards the Kalam and the Mutakallimun.
The section clearly lists Al-Shafi'i as part of theologians of the Traditionalist ( Athari ) camp and hence why I added the reference as such along with the sub-section. The citation was simply a addendum which elaborated his opposition to Kalam. To accuse multiple times; of other editors engaging in violations without proof is quite rude; but I do hope you were unaware of the details.
Thank you.