| Revision as of 01:59, 9 February 2007 editEd (talk | contribs)6,213 editsm change wording← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:04, 9 February 2007 edit undoPseudo-Richard (talk | contribs)27,682 edits Cleanup - I've tried to keep the intent of the original text while cleaning up and tightening up the languageNext edit → | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| Esperanza was first ] in November 2006. Critics of the group argued that Esperanza distracted people from contributing to the encyclopedia proper by providing an environment for social interaction. Esperanza was also criticized for having regular Council elections, which were seen as nothing more than popularity contests. Following a no consensus result in the first motion to delete Esperanza, the organization engaged in a series of reforms, which resulted in the deletion of the coffee lounge, the user page awards, Stressbusters and the Barnstar Brigade. The group also attempted to promote participation in the article namespace by creating an Esperanza Collaboration of the Month. While most of the reform discussions ultimately reached a consensus, the overhaul discussions related to Esperanza's goals, its charter, its governance, what constitutes membership, and the noticeboard weren't completed. | Esperanza was first ] in November 2006. Critics of the group argued that Esperanza distracted people from contributing to the encyclopedia proper by providing an environment for social interaction. Esperanza was also criticized for having regular Council elections, which were seen as nothing more than popularity contests. Following a no consensus result in the first motion to delete Esperanza, the organization engaged in a series of reforms, which resulted in the deletion of the coffee lounge, the user page awards, Stressbusters and the Barnstar Brigade. The group also attempted to promote participation in the article namespace by creating an Esperanza Collaboration of the Month. While most of the reform discussions ultimately reached a consensus, the overhaul discussions related to Esperanza's goals, its charter, its governance, what constitutes membership, and the noticeboard weren't completed. | ||
| A month later, Esperanza was once again ]. Noted complaints included: | A month later, Esperanza was once again ]. Noted complaints included: | ||
| * That, although many of the goals of Esperanza were laudable, there were serious difficulties in implementation which, despite repeated attempts, were not resolved, | |||
| * |
* That the overhaul, that was allegedly done to prevent the deletion of Esperanza rather than to actually fix it, was unsuccessful in reforming Esperanza, | ||
| * Esperanza had a "holier-than-thou" belief that without Esperanza, Misplaced Pages would |
* That Esperanza had a "holier-than-thou" belief that without Esperanza, Misplaced Pages would fail as a project. Similarly, there had been noted complaints that Esperanzians treated non-Esperanzians as inferior, | ||
| * Esperanza had set |
* That Esperanza had set its members apart from the rest of the Misplaced Pages community through their activities, such as the ''Esperanza'' Collaboration of the Month, | ||
| * |
* That the operating principles of the Esperanza bureaucracy were in conflict with Misplaced Pages's principles; the council made binding decisions through off-wiki conversations which were only made available after the event, and | ||
| * Esperanza was an excellent idea but very difficult to implement; additionally, a large project isn't needed to spread hope and good cheer throughout the community. | |||
| * That a large project wasn't needed to spread hope and good cheer. | |||
| After long discussion, it was ultimately decided that Esperanza |
After long discussion, it was ultimately decided that Esperanza should be decentralized and disbanded; see above for a list of now-independent projects. Other pages about Esperanza themselves were redirected to this page, which was replaced with the summary above. | ||
| More debates followed on various pages in the Misplaced Pages namespace, including on a ] filed to review aspects of the MfD closure. The closing admin declared the consensus to be that the original MfD decision was endorsed. | More debates followed on various pages in the Misplaced Pages namespace, including on a ] filed to review aspects of the MfD closure. The closing admin declared the consensus to be that the original MfD decision was endorsed. | ||
Revision as of 02:04, 9 February 2007
|
This project is officially inactive as a result of this Miscellany for Deletion discussion. Some of the former Esperanza projects are now functioning as independent projects:
|
Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/sandbox Esperanza was a Misplaced Pages project founded on August 12, 2005. Its goals were to support the encyclopedia indirectly by encouraging a sense of community. It was the belief of Esperanza that a friendly, supportive community within Misplaced Pages would help the encyclopedia by keeping editors happy, productive, and on the project. The name is derived from the Spanish word for "hope," and the original goal was to offer hope for the Misplaced Pages community and bring it together. When proposing the association, the founder wrote the following:
Esperanza or Esperanza Association is a proposed association of wikipedians dedicated to strengthening wikipedia's sense of community through establishing a support network for wikipedians in an environment that is often hostile and apathetic. Esperanza takes its name from the Spanish word for hope. We have taken this name the in spirit of offering hope to wikipedians who feel isolated and ignored. Spanish is used in the hope that a segment of the wikipedia community will never again feel so isolated that it breaks away from the community as did a portion of the Spanish wikipedia community did to form Enciclopedia Libre.
Towards those goals, Esperanza attempted a number of initiatives, such as:
- A stress alerts page that would alert Esperanza if someone was ill or feeling highly stressed due to issues on Misplaced Pages or in real life, or if someone left Misplaced Pages.
- Admin Coaching, where newcomers could get assistance from Misplaced Pages administrators.
- Reach Out, which provided consoling.
- Tutorial Drive, which aimed to write a series of tutorials for using and editing Misplaced Pages
- A calendar for members to list their birthday, first-edit day, etc. Esperanza tried to send out birthday wishes to Wikipedians.
- The to-do list.
- Trading Spaces, where Wikipedians could request help for designing their user page.
- The coffee lounge for casual discussion.
- The User page awards for well-designed user pages.
- The Barnstar Brigade which gave out barnstars to users for good work.
- Stressbusters, which investigated the source of wikistress.
Some of these programs survive as independent projects.
Esperanza was governed by a charter, which stipulated an Advisory Council with staggered terms, as well as an Administrator General who was selected by the council to lead the project. Amendments to the charter could be made through week-long discussions held on Misplaced Pages talk:Esperanza. This was criticized as being heavily bureaucratic; Misplaced Pages is not a bureaucracy.
Esperanza was first nominated for deletion in November 2006. Critics of the group argued that Esperanza distracted people from contributing to the encyclopedia proper by providing an environment for social interaction. Esperanza was also criticized for having regular Council elections, which were seen as nothing more than popularity contests. Following a no consensus result in the first motion to delete Esperanza, the organization engaged in a series of reforms, which resulted in the deletion of the coffee lounge, the user page awards, Stressbusters and the Barnstar Brigade. The group also attempted to promote participation in the article namespace by creating an Esperanza Collaboration of the Month. While most of the reform discussions ultimately reached a consensus, the overhaul discussions related to Esperanza's goals, its charter, its governance, what constitutes membership, and the noticeboard weren't completed.
A month later, Esperanza was once again nominated for deletion. Noted complaints included:
- That, although many of the goals of Esperanza were laudable, there were serious difficulties in implementation which, despite repeated attempts, were not resolved,
- That the overhaul, that was allegedly done to prevent the deletion of Esperanza rather than to actually fix it, was unsuccessful in reforming Esperanza,
- That Esperanza had a "holier-than-thou" belief that without Esperanza, Misplaced Pages would fail as a project. Similarly, there had been noted complaints that Esperanzians treated non-Esperanzians as inferior,
- That Esperanza had set its members apart from the rest of the Misplaced Pages community through their activities, such as the Esperanza Collaboration of the Month,
- That the operating principles of the Esperanza bureaucracy were in conflict with Misplaced Pages's principles; the council made binding decisions through off-wiki conversations which were only made available after the event, and
- That a large project wasn't needed to spread hope and good cheer.
After long discussion, it was ultimately decided that Esperanza should be decentralized and disbanded; see above for a list of now-independent projects. Other pages about Esperanza themselves were redirected to this page, which was replaced with the summary above.
More debates followed on various pages in the Misplaced Pages namespace, including on a deletion review filed to review aspects of the MfD closure. The closing admin declared the consensus to be that the original MfD decision was endorsed.
Categories: