Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Anton Zilwicki: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:43, 8 January 2022 editMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Replaced obsolete font tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB← Previous edit Revision as of 15:59, 28 January 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed misnested tags and reduced Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWBNext edit →
Line 20: Line 20:
*'''Delete''' as above. No assertion of real-world notability. ] (]) 17:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC) *'''Delete''' as above. No assertion of real-world notability. ] (]) 17:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''merge''' Minor characters are not worth whole articles except in the very most important fictions, and this is not really one. Primary sources do fine for such content, and in fact are preferred for straightforward things related to plot. ''']''' (]) 21:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC) *'''merge''' Minor characters are not worth whole articles except in the very most important fictions, and this is not really one. Primary sources do fine for such content, and in fact are preferred for straightforward things related to plot. ''']''' (]) 21:09, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''Question''' How many books or other media was this character featured in, and to what extent?]''' 04:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC) *'''Question''' How many books or other media was this character featured in, and to what extent?] 04:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''Answer''' no reliable independent sources address that issue, the crux of the problem here. We'd have to trust an obsessive fan to read all of the books and ancillary material, and make lists, and then take his word for it. And why? So we can categorize something that has no demonstrated (via reliable independent sources) notability in the Reality-verse.] (]) 13:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC) *'''Answer''' no reliable independent sources address that issue, the crux of the problem here. We'd have to trust an obsessive fan to read all of the books and ancillary material, and make lists, and then take his word for it. And why? So we can categorize something that has no demonstrated (via reliable independent sources) notability in the Reality-verse.] (]) 13:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
*'''Merge''' to ] ] (]) 15:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC) *'''Merge''' to ] ] (]) 15:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:59, 28 January 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to List of Honorverse characters. Nakon 05:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Anton Zilwicki

Anton Zilwicki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable, unsourced, in-universe, plot summary; tagged over a year ago for clean-up and no resolution of concerns. Jack Merridew 07:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.