Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Kaela Mensha Khaine: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:37, 14 September 2008 editBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,148 edits Closing debate, result was delete← Previous edit Revision as of 10:29, 3 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWBNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:
<hr style="width:50%;"/> <hr style="width:50%;"/>
:<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 03:05, 13 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.'''</span><br/><small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 03:05, 13 September 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
*'''Delete'''- excessively lengthy ] with no references outside of ''Games Workshop''. ] <sub>]</sub> 10:36, 13 September 2008 (UTC) *'''Delete'''- excessively lengthy ] with no references outside of ''Games Workshop''. ] ] 10:36, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' - Without coverage in reliable sources, it is just an unnecessary plot summary. ] (]) 19:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC) *'''Delete''' - Without coverage in reliable sources, it is just an unnecessary plot summary. ] (]) 19:31, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
*This article should be '''kept''' due to coverage in a . --] (]) 06:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC) *This article should be '''kept''' due to coverage in a . --] (]) 06:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
**Does it have any real-world information though, which is what matters for fiction articles? &ndash; ] <sup>]•]</sup> 08:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC) **Does it have any real-world information though, which is what matters for fiction articles? &ndash; ] <sup>]•]</sup> 08:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
***What do you mean by "real-world information"? --] (]) 17:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC) ***What do you mean by "real-world information"? --] (]) 17:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
**'''Comment'''- that encyclopedia is a ]. That is, it's a source that is too closely associated with the subject to confer ]. For that you need reliable, independent sources (for example newspaper articles, scientific papers, critical reviews etc). This is one of our most important policies. If we didn't demand proper secondary sources, Misplaced Pages could become swamped with articles on all sorts of rubbish. Every blog, incoherent conspiracy theory, dodgy youtube video and adolescent fanfic would end up here and that would be a Very Bad Thing. That's not to say primary sources are useless. They can be invaluable in sourcing facts for the article and fleshing it out, once notability is established by other means. If primary sources are all you've got, however, the article will not meet ]. ] <sub>]</sub> 08:23, 14 September 2008 (UTC) **'''Comment'''- that encyclopedia is a ]. That is, it's a source that is too closely associated with the subject to confer ]. For that you need reliable, independent sources (for example newspaper articles, scientific papers, critical reviews etc). This is one of our most important policies. If we didn't demand proper secondary sources, Misplaced Pages could become swamped with articles on all sorts of rubbish. Every blog, incoherent conspiracy theory, dodgy youtube video and adolescent fanfic would end up here and that would be a Very Bad Thing. That's not to say primary sources are useless. They can be invaluable in sourcing facts for the article and fleshing it out, once notability is established by other means. If primary sources are all you've got, however, the article will not meet ]. ] ] 08:23, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
***This source is published and not a youtube video made by fans. --] (]) 17:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC) ***This source is published and not a youtube video made by fans. --] (]) 17:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per Doctorfluffy. It is doubtful that a decent article (i.e. one that doesn't violate any policies and guidelines) could ever be made out of this. &ndash; ] <sup>]•]</sup> 08:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per Doctorfluffy. It is doubtful that a decent article (i.e. one that doesn't violate any policies and guidelines) could ever be made out of this. &ndash; ] <sup>]•]</sup> 08:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Line 28: Line 28:
*'''Delete''' due to lack of independent coverage in reliable sources. More suitable to a specialist wiki. ] (]) 16:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC) *'''Delete''' due to lack of independent coverage in reliable sources. More suitable to a specialist wiki. ] (]) 16:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 10:29, 3 February 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite 22:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

Kaela Mensha Khaine

Kaela Mensha Khaine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article fails WP:SOURCES by relying on primary sources. Article was set to redirect to Eldar (Warhammer 40,000), but has been restored - deleting the article would prevent this happening again. -- JediLofty Follow me 09:09, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:05, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.