Revision as of 00:51, 23 November 2021 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,055 edits →ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:24, 7 February 2022 edit undoMoxy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors129,460 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Latvia.Tag: TwinkleNext edit → | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1056563443 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1056563443 --> | ||
== February 2022 == | |||
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="font-weight:bold;color:darkblue">]</span>-] 01:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:24, 7 February 2022
Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Hello, DudeFromTheBaltics, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Learn from others
- Be kind to others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us a bit about yourself
- Our great guide to Misplaced Pages
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}}
on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains 02:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Tip of the day... Upgrade Recent Changes in my preferencesHave you tried the Advanced options in your Recent changes user preferences settings? It requires a modern browser to work and is disabled by default.
Unlike the normal "recent changes" page, these options can summarize edits to the same page and let you dynamically expand and collapse the list items. For multiple edits to the same page, it also provides a single "changes" link which will show you a view of the differences (diffs) between these combined edits and the last non-recent revision.
After changing the Advanced options, the "Recent changes" list takes effect immediately and can be reversed by unchecking any option.
Prior tip – Tips library – Next tip Read more:Help:Recent changes m:Help:Recent changes Become a Misplaced Pages tipster To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}Latvian Opinion polls
Factum as far as I know haven't published their latest polls yet (as of 5th of august, 2019). Please provide source for the poll or delete it.--OskarsC (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
Tautastribunals
Hi, it does not appear that the Tautastribunals is independantly notable outside of its founder (at least not according to the sources cited), so I've redirected the page to Linards Grantiņš and added a mention of it there (could be expanded there, perhaps as a subsection). A note about sourcing, we cannot link to posts on the page itself to demonstrate the page's hatred, we have to reflect what secondary sources have said about the site, anything else is considered original research. We can also not use descriptors for it unless secondary sources have used those. If newspapers have discussed the site's call for the death penalty of Valdis Dombrovskis then we can mention it. – Thjarkur (talk) 21:04, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
February 2022
Your recent editing history at Latvia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Moxy- 01:24, 7 February 2022 (UTC)