| Revision as of 06:05, 7 February 2022 edit49.195.81.81 (talk) →February 2022Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:46, 7 February 2022 edit undoZefr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers69,183 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Goji.Tag: TwinkleNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| :: meh, I haven't done anything wrong and I attributed sources correctly. You are trying to push people to not mention the obvious correct information that goji berries have lots of vitamin A, etc and USDA has more credibility here. ] (]) 06:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC) | :: meh, I haven't done anything wrong and I attributed sources correctly. You are trying to push people to not mention the obvious correct information that goji berries have lots of vitamin A, etc and USDA has more credibility here. ] (]) 06:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 06:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| {{Block indent|''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider ] for yourself or ] so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''}}<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 06:46, 7 February 2022
February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, as you did at Goji, you may be blocked from editing. This user is also IP 49.195.2.162 shown in the history as previously stubborn, mistaken, and disruptive. Zefr (talk) 04:51, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.- meh, I haven't done anything wrong and I attributed sources correctly. You are trying to push people to not mention the obvious correct information that goji berries have lots of vitamin A, etc and USDA has more credibility here. 49.195.81.81 (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Goji shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Zefr (talk) 06:46, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.