| Revision as of 08:26, 1 June 2021 editMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed old behaviour of link-wrapping font tags in a signature (Task 1)Tag: AWB← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 09:35, 13 February 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| Thank you for your detailed comment regarding the legality of copied Dvd's. When i wrote the article i was under the impression it was legal (as stated on their website). There website is not running anymore and they are not accpeting anymore orders so i can only assume they have closed down. Delete the article now as it is based on a non-existant company ] 19:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | Thank you for your detailed comment regarding the legality of copied Dvd's. When i wrote the article i was under the impression it was legal (as stated on their website). There website is not running anymore and they are not accpeting anymore orders so i can only assume they have closed down. Delete the article now as it is based on a non-existant company ] 19:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.'' <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div> | ||
Latest revision as of 09:35, 13 February 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was CSD-G7 speedy delete. ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:42, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Pro-dvds
Ignoring the legality of the site and local shop in question, this article fails to assert any notability for the company, which itself fails WP:CORP.➨ ЯEDVERS 19:58, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, non-notable. --PresN 20:13, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and send the Old Bill around... ~ Matticus78 20:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
I object to the deletion of this page. It is stub article and needs expanding, not deleting. Regarding the legality of it, as far as i no it is perfectly legal. Dean randall 20:11, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm afraid you're mistaken, or have been misled by internet copyright fairytales (like that old "it's legal if you delete within 24 hours" chestnut). In the UK it is illegal to make backups of games for personal use even if you own the original, without written consent from the copyright holder (http://www.elspa.com/?l=faq&cat=21). The "legal backup" clause is a relic from the days of unreliable floppy disks and cassette tapes, and no longer applies. And while it's not, strictly speaking, illegal to make a back up of a DVD, breaking the copy protection to do so is (http://www.euro-copyrights.org/index/8/13). Even putting those matters aside, profiting from the sale of copyrighted material most certainly is illegal, and far, far more likely to get you in serious trouble than your average joe copying his CDs to put in the car stereo. But I digress; the AfD debate is over notability, not legality. ~ Matticus78 22:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for your detailed comment regarding the legality of copied Dvd's. When i wrote the article i was under the impression it was legal (as stated on their website). There website is not running anymore and they are not accpeting anymore orders so i can only assume they have closed down. Delete the article now as it is based on a non-existant company Dean randall 19:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.