| Revision as of 15:59, 12 February 2022 editPeterkingiron (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers36,716 edits →The Given Town← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:18, 13 February 2022 edit undo68.189.242.116 (talk) →The Given Town: k or mNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (] | ]) 17:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (] | ]) 17:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Merge''' to ]. I assume good faith in translation and thus that the conclusion is correct that the footage is part of a Nazi propaganda film. If so, the footage is notable, but does not need a separate article. ] (]) 15:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC) | *'''Merge''' to ]. I assume good faith in translation and thus that the conclusion is correct that the footage is part of a Nazi propaganda film. If so, the footage is notable, but does not need a separate article. ] (]) 15:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' or '''Merge'''. I added two English language sources after this was nominated so everything there is now verifiable. There is a suggestion of notability for the documentary film juxtaposition of found propaganda footage with drawings from concentration camp artists independent of the propaganda film itself. However, these sources alone are not the most extensive coverage though there is almost certainly more in Czech, as the mention of a contemporaneous newspaper interview and coverage attests. If merged, an argument could be made for either ] or ] with my preference for the former. ] (]) 18:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:18, 13 February 2022
The Given Town
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- The Given Town (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Insufficient sourcing both here and at cswiki. Did a BEFORE search that didn't turn up anything useful, though I don't speak Czech so I'm not comfortable PRODing it. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:11, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- Merge to Theresienstadt. I assume good faith in translation and thus that the conclusion is correct that the footage is part of a Nazi propaganda film. If so, the footage is notable, but does not need a separate article. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep or Merge. I added two English language sources after this was nominated so everything there is now verifiable. There is a suggestion of notability for the documentary film juxtaposition of found propaganda footage with drawings from concentration camp artists independent of the propaganda film itself. However, these sources alone are not the most extensive coverage though there is almost certainly more in Czech, as the mention of a contemporaneous newspaper interview and coverage attests. If merged, an argument could be made for either Terezín_concentration_camp#Legacy or Theresienstadt_(film)#Historiography with my preference for the former. 68.189.242.116 (talk) 18:18, 13 February 2022 (UTC)