User talk:Geschichte/2021-2024: Difference between revisions

< User talk:Geschichte Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 06:58, 6 February 2022 editSpinster300 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers6,328 edits →Thank you for the thank yous!: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 05:50, 15 February 2022 edit undoTamzin (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators69,010 edits →Mario Cerrito AfD: new sectionNext edit →
Line 316:		Line 316:

	Dearest {{u\|Geschichte}}, thank you so much for the love you have shown me for the articles I have recently started, you are indeed very kind! Sincerest regards, ] (]) 06:58, 6 February 2022 (UTC).		Dearest {{u\|Geschichte}}, thank you so much for the love you have shown me for the articles I have recently started, you are indeed very kind! Sincerest regards, ] (]) 06:58, 6 February 2022 (UTC).

			== Mario Cerrito AfD ==

			Hi, Geschichte. I only just noticed your close of ], and I was wondering if you'd reconsider it, or at least would add a closing rationale. The way I see it:
			* I moved to delete
			* Summerlee44 !voted keep, but was blocked as a sockpuppet by the time you closed
			* Alansohn !voted keep
			* Oaktree b !voted delete
			* 2601:8D:8700:5E10:D5E0:983D:E9A4:B0E8 !voted keep, but was blocked as a sockpuppet by the time you closed
			* Roman Spinner !voted keep, but acknowledged having been canvassed by one of the sockpuppets. He argued that the canvassing didn't matter since he always !votes keep, which I don't think is as persuasive an argument as he thinks for his !vote to be counted.
			* Lamona !voted weak keep
			* Saiskysat !voted keep. This was Saiskysat's 24th ever edit, their first in 2 and a half years, and their only ever edit to projectspace.
			Thus if you discount the two sock !votes, the canvassed !vote, and the very suspicious !vote from a long-dormant account, it comes down to '''two delete, one keep, one weak keep'''. If your reading of the strength of the arguments, across those four !votes, is that there is nonetheless a consensus to keep, then I'm open to hearing that, but respectfully I don't think this is a case where a one-word ''keep'' close is sufficient. Preferable, I think, would be a relist with the sock !votes ], or a close as no consensus. <span class="nowrap"> <span style="font-family:courier">-- ]</span><sup>]'']</sup> (she/they)</span> 05:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:50, 15 February 2022

I will usually reply on this page only.

Archives:

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hoax

Hello! Following the deletion of hoax article, could you please restore the article in order to add it to this page. Thanks.--Renvoy (talk) 11:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Not all entries in the list are recreations and I frankly don't see the point. As for the dates it was created as a draft on 18 December 2019 and existed in the main space since 28 March 2020. Geschichte (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

unexplained revert

Could you explain your reverts? (Next time, please explein beforehand). -DePiep (talk) 09:58, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Wrong speedy deletion criterion. Please find a fitting criterion Geschichte (talk) 09:59, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

What is wrong? Deleting a page I have personally ~edited out of use, made superfluous and unused, why are you questioning this? -DePiep (talk)

In nominating for G8 you claimed that it was "dependent on a non-existent page", which it is not? Geschichte (talk) 10:04, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

I tried to be as specific as possible in the speedy criterion, as the page is not transcluded any more by intention. But alas, I'll make it generic G6 for the parent, and will wait silently till afterwards G8 applies for the subs. To serve hairsplitters. -DePiep (talk) 10:10, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

There are normal deletion processes as well- Why was it so important to speedy it? Geschichte (talk) 10:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Because the page is unused by intention & new design. As I wrote above @10:03 (lol has no timestamp?!). In fact, its data job is now perfomed by a dedicated module. Is there a reason to scrutinise my requests this micrographic? Never met such questions in similar situations. -DePiep (talk) 10:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

I'd say, you could confirm by now right? See Template:P-phrases/text‎‎. -DePiep (talk) 10:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Rock art articles

Hello. I've noticed that you are a member of Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Norway. I'm writing this to draw your attention to my message here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Norway#Rock_art_articles,_anyone?.

If this might be of interest to you, please let me know. If not, please excuse me for distubing you. Bw --Orland (talk) 12:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

CSD G13s

Hello, Geschichte,

I found four drafts that 1989 improperly tagged for CSD G13 speedy deletion. They tagged them months before they were eligible for deletion so I have restored them. They look like they went on CSD tagging binge this morning and tagged 68 pages over a few hours even though they have not been a regular CSD page tagger since 2019. I'm going to spot check some other pages on their CSD log to make sure they were properly tagged.

We have several admins working with the daily list of expiring drafts so, please, if you see pages tagged G13, look over the page history and make sure they are eligible. Thank you! Liz 04:19, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

The Witching Season

Hello, Geschichte,

I saw you recently deleted some articles that were PROD'd. Could you take care of this one? I placed the proposed deletion tag on it so I don't feel comfortable deleting it myself. It came due over 12 hours ago but no one seems to be patrolling User:DumbBOT/ProdSummary recently, they must be off doing fun, weekend activities. Thanks! Liz 20:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Bangladesh U20 team fixtures

So can I add the match stats from 2019 since those are the teams most recent fixtures?FNH004 (talk) 12:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Please consult the pages about the senior national teams; the recent fixtures header should include games from one year in the past. Geschichte (talk) 13:50, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tomme Tønner for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Tomme Tønner is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tomme Tønner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Brayan ocaner (talk) 22:16, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Geschichte, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Misplaced Pages:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:56, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Just an addendum, a recent RFC passed that removed the autopatrolled user right from the administrator toolkit. As you have created over 20,000 pages, I believe it would be wise to grant you the autopatrolled user right. If you would like it removed, feel free to ping me or post a message on my talk page. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kjartan Antonsson

The article Kjartan Antonsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 22:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Momir Mileta

The article Momir Mileta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Proposed deletion of Pétur Björn Jónsson

The article Pétur Björn Jónsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Proposed deletion of Jonas Lind

The article Jonas Lind has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Proposed deletion of Mikael Blomberg

The article Mikael Blomberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Proposed deletion of Patrik Bengtsson

The article Patrik Bengtsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Nomination of Mikael Blomberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mikael Blomberg is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mikael Blomberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 20:52, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jonas Lind for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonas Lind is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Jonas Lind until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 20:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Geschichte!

Happy New Year!

Geschichte,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
Abishe (talk) 13:04, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Merchandise giveaway nomination

A token of thanks

Hi Geschichte! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}  ~~~~~

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Oskar Hordnes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oskar Hordnes is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Oskar Hordnes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Aksel Fugelli for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aksel Fugelli is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aksel Fugelli until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

–dlthewave ☎ 04:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Dimitris Farantos

Hello, I noticed when you created Dimitris Farantos you listed him as a "retired football midfielder". However, I see no information on his career in the given sources, is it correct that he is a former player? S.A. Julio (talk) 16:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for picking this up. It must have been wrongly inserted, so I removed mentions of it. Geschichte (talk) 19:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Torgeir Garmo

The article Torgeir Garmo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP about someone who fails WP:NPOL.

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Norwegian film

I saw on another editors page that you have an interest in improving articles about Norwegian film. I don't know many Norwegian films but I greatly enjoyed Headhunters (film) and it could certainly do with a few more reviews of all kinds (and I'm fairly sure I added the single solitary review from Roger Ebert). If you could include a couple of reviews from reputable Norwegian critics to provide a local perspective that would be excellent. -- 109.78.197.54 (talk) 16:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

I'll format it in the same way as on the other film - 12 reviews as a starting point! Geschichte (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. -- 109.78.197.54 (talk) 00:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Geschichte a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! CAPTAIN RAJU 22:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Happy anniversary, Geschichte! Liz 02:04, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Football stubs

Hello, Geschichte,

I look at a daily draftication list and noticed that many football stubs by Das osmnezz that you moved to Draft space, were immediately moved back. I don't know whether or not the players meet the football standards for notability but I thought I'd let you know. Thanks! Liz 02:04, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Closing relisted AFDs

Please remove Category:Relisted AfD debates from AFDs when closing them, as this category is only meant to track active discussions. Having to go through dozens of these on more than one occasion is not fun. ✗plicit 12:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

I honestly thought this was done by a bot? Geschichte (talk) 16:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Like here. When did it cease? Geschichte (talk) 20:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Kevin Zhu (violinist) fixed recommended changes and thanks′

I don't know if a User's wikipedia talk page is appropriate for this but I would like to apologize for my comments regarding : "I don't see there is any argument made against my article?" at the deletion discussion page as it is wrong to assume that an article is 'mine' and I wrote that unknowing if the author of a wikipedia article could have a say in the discussion and guessing if I was in the wrong, someone would call me out for it. I would also like to thank you for the suggests of the Kevin Zhu article that I have now implmented into the article. JeffreyViolin (talk) 1:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm happy for you that it was kept. Geschichte (talk) 09:10, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Not sure

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk%3ASikonmina&type=revision&diff=1066207984&oldid=1066123237 What do you think? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

It seems a little fishy. Do you have any particular previous user in mind? Geschichte (talk) 16:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

One of the other editors on the new account's Talk page said he did recognise someone who had been blocked, Atlantic I think, but he did not say who and was blanked by the new account. Just prior to your own message. The first edits make it clear that this is an account with previous history. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Aksel

I have added the information about Aksel Kankaanranta’s charting song to his article. Please take a look.--BabbaQ (talk) 09:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Deletion of JBAND$

The article JBNAD$ has been deleted because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

Hello there, good morning Geschichte,

I saw you recently deleted my article. Can you please undelete the article so i can get back to work, it shouldn't have been deleted. Even though it was visible that the page had bits of information being added to it at a time, two days after the article was created the page was flagged for WP:PROD and instead of suggesting improvements or contributing the editor further flagged it for WP:AFD. That's borderline vandalism. Nobody contested the article for that 7 day period because improvement edits were being made, when it was time for the discussion to be closed it was relisted by yourself. Later, an editor contributed to the discussion making a personal attack against the person in the article which shouldn't be taken up with me but it was still counted as a contribution which leads me on to say that 3 biased opinions shouldn't count as a voting system resulting in a snowball clause by closing the AfD a day early. I assume as you know when a wikipedia article is created, deleting it is last resort unless it is a personal attack page, spam, copyright violation or promotion and that would lead to speedy deletion which this page was ineligible for as you already know. Thanks! I just came here to follow wiki guidelines instead of deletion review. Kind regards. GsB0414 (Talk) 02:34, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

I can draftify it for you, however I just want you to grasp how Misplaced Pages works before I do so. For one, you were fully eligible to contribute to the deletion discussion, but did not do so, nor to any discussion, instead you have just removed everything from your talk page. The AFD was not closed a day early, it was closed after 13 days instead of 7 days which is the normal procedure. Deletion is not a last resort in those cases only, there is a number of other guidelines which articles are measured against, see for instance all the listings at WP:AFD/Yesterday. After you reply sommething to this, I will draftify it for you. Geschichte (talk) 07:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

I removed the first WP:PROD from my talk page a couple days after because it was messy. With the first discussion i didn't input anything because i thought it was conflict of interest until i read the guidelines and when it was relisted i clicked edit and it told me that i'm banned for a certain amount of days. Also, because the AFD was relisted, i thought it would have gone another 7 days. Nevertheless, i understand what you are saying. Thank-you. Kind regards. GsB0414 (Talk) 22:00, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

You GsB0414 have never been blocked, so maybe you used an IP which is blocked? Several school and public library IPs tend to be blocked. Geschichte (talk) 07:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

I have now restored it to Draft:JBAND$. Please note that the article is currently very far from being acceptable at Misplaced Pages. Frankly, JBAND$ really has not done anything to distinguish himself in the music world. Primary sources as well as references which are not about JBAND$, do not count towards the goal of the article, which is to show that JBAND$ has got significant and independent attention from reliable sources. Geschichte (talk) 08:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Ronald Rose Deletion

Hi Geschichte. Hope you are keeping well. I observe you deleted article on Ronald Rose. The position held by him is considered reputed as he is also a bureaucrat. He did lot of activities in places he served. Can I know the reasons behind deletion. thank you. Gardenkur (talk) 11:59, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

It was deleted not due to my personal opinion, but because a deletion discussion was opened for the article. The discussion ended and deletion was the result as per Misplaced Pages:SOFTDELETE. While it is possible to create the article again, I strongly advise not to include bullet lists of every activity he has ever done. It violates the rule Misplaced Pages:NOTCV. Instead, try to focus and explain why he is an important bureaucrat. Geschichte (talk) 12:08, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Redirect of Matias Moldskred to Matias Belli Moldskred

Geschichte, I was wondering why you redirected the page I created, Matias Moldskred, to Matias Belli Moldskred, because the latter was created a full day after I created the former. On top of that, couldn't my page just be edited instead of redirected? Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 08:08, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Having the Belli name in the article title was important since he was notable as a Nicaragua international and was using his Nicaraguan name Belli in that context. Also, as one had to be merged into the other, there was little to merge from Matias Moldskred, barely anything, mostly just the categories. Therefore, the solution was better for content attribution. Geschichte (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Frank Tandberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Tandberg is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Frank Tandberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Star Garnet (talk) 15:44, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the thank yous!

Dearest Geschichte, thank you so much for the love you have shown me for the articles I have recently started, you are indeed very kind! Sincerest regards, Spinster300 (talk) 06:58, 6 February 2022 (UTC).

Mario Cerrito AfD

Hi, Geschichte. I only just noticed your close of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mario Cerrito (2nd nomination), and I was wondering if you'd reconsider it, or at least would add a closing rationale. The way I see it:

I moved to delete
Summerlee44 !voted keep, but was blocked as a sockpuppet by the time you closed
Alansohn !voted keep
Oaktree b !voted delete
2601:8D:8700:5E10:D5E0:983D:E9A4:B0E8 !voted keep, but was blocked as a sockpuppet by the time you closed
Roman Spinner !voted keep, but acknowledged having been canvassed by one of the sockpuppets. He argued that the canvassing didn't matter since he always !votes keep, which I don't think is as persuasive an argument as he thinks for his !vote to be counted.
Lamona !voted weak keep
Saiskysat !voted keep. This was Saiskysat's 24th ever edit, their first in 2 and a half years, and their only ever edit to projectspace.

Thus if you discount the two sock !votes, the canvassed !vote, and the very suspicious !vote from a long-dormant account, it comes down to two delete, one keep, one weak keep. If your reading of the strength of the arguments, across those four !votes, is that there is nonetheless a consensus to keep, then I'm open to hearing that, but respectfully I don't think this is a case where a one-word keep close is sufficient. Preferable, I think, would be a relist with the sock !votes struck, or a close as no consensus. -- Tamzin (she/they) 05:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)