Revision as of 09:50, 28 January 2022 editJohnsoniensis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users720,824 edits wp x 2← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:46, 16 February 2022 edit undoBattyBot (talk | contribs)Bots1,932,911 edits →top: Added Template:WikiProject banner shell and other General fixesTag: AWBNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Old AfD multi |
{{Old AfD multi|date=15 August 2021 |result='''keep''' |page=Van Wickle Gates}} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= | |||
{{WPUC|class=c}} | |||
{{WikiProject Higher education|class=c}} | |||
{{WikiProject Architecture|class=c|importance=}} | {{WikiProject Architecture|class=c|importance=}} | ||
{{WikiProject United States|class=c|importance=low |RI=y}} | {{WikiProject United States|class=c|importance=low |RI=y}} | ||
}} | |||
== Notability == | == Notability == | ||
Not relevant for its own Wiki article, in my opinion. Merging into Brown under a 'traditions' section would probably be better. ] (]) 04:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC) | Not relevant for its own Wiki article, in my opinion. Merging into Brown under a 'traditions' section would probably be better. ] (]) 04:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:46, 16 February 2022
This article was nominated for deletion on 15 August 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Notability
Not relevant for its own Wiki article, in my opinion. Merging into Brown under a 'traditions' section would probably be better. Jacotto (talk) 04:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Gallery
@Drmies and Beyond My Ken: There is no reason for the gallery to be any larger than the default size. If a larger size was necessary, the default would simply be larger. Filetime (talk) 02:56, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- Yeah, Filetime, it wasn't about the default size. Drmies (talk) 02:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Please, tell me what my intention was. Filetime (talk) 03:03, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- The default size in a gallery is just that, the default size. It is not the ideal size, it's simply the size that the images will be displayed at if no other size is specified. The fact that we have the capability of specifying a different size is an indication that doing so is not disallowed. My philosophy is that images in Misplaced Pages articles should be presented at a sufficient size in order that they can be "read" by our users without requiring them to have to click through. Some will click through anyway because they want to see more detail but for most readers, a look at the gallery is sufficient if they can actually see the image which is extremely hard to do at the default size. For this reason, I believe that gallery images should be a large as is practicable, and not tiny, difficult to see images smaller than a postage stamp. There certainly is not policy or reccommendation in MOS which justifies your reverting my adjustments to the image size in the gallery- by doing so, you are only doing a disservice to our readers. Beyond My Ken (talk) 15:19, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Higher education articles
- WikiProject Higher education articles
- C-Class Architecture articles
- Unknown-importance Architecture articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Rhode Island articles
- Unknown-importance Rhode Island articles
- WikiProject Rhode Island articles
- WikiProject United States articles