| Revision as of 16:25, 16 February 2022 editJohannes Maximilian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers10,798 edits Reverted 1 edit by 176.54.243.248 (talk)Tags: Twinkle Undo← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:52, 16 February 2022 edit undoMrsSnoozyTurtle (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users32,338 edits Removing old topicsNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| --] (]) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging | --] (]) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Megalibrarygirl@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1066448074 --> | <!-- Message sent by User:Megalibrarygirl@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/G-N&oldid=1066448074 --> | ||
| == Draft:Helen Kaminski == | |||
| Hi MrsSnoozyTurtle, | |||
| A few months ago, you made some edits to my draft: Helen Kaminski page. I was wondering if you could have a look again and see if the draft is viable for the main space or if anything needs improvement? This would be very much appreciated.] (]) 03:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| : Hello Zoe Blue98. I see that you had already submitted the draft for review at AfC, so I think it's best that I don't interfere with that process. Regards, ] 11:37, 4 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| The article passes ] and ]. ] is a well known TV production house from Eastern India who are producing prime time dramas for TV channels like ], ] etc whose audiences are in ] and ] since more than 15+ years. It looks like you don't understand Bengali. If you don't like it, open for discussion at article talk-page rather than forcefully deletion using ] since you don't like it. You have twice tried to undermine the article by placing maintenance tags with same reasons earlier. Apart from print and digital media ], it has been also cited in | |||
| *{{cite book |last1=Munshi |first1=Shoma |title=Prime Time Soap Operas on Indian Television |date=18 February 2020 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-000-05224-4 |url=https://books.google.co.in/books?id=WWLRDwAAQBAJ |language=en}} | |||
| I request you to remove the ]. I am tagging some members from ] for help. ] (]) 11:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::Tagging {{ping|Titodutta|Ahp101|ArnabSaha|Anupamdutta73|Rickyurs}}. Please help. Thank you. ] (]) 12:02, 4 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| I also see that you have a habit of tagging pages that are usually reverted. See yourself. ] (]) 12:13, 4 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::: @] Hey, I saw this message and observed the article. There are no references about the TV production itself. There are only references about its produced TV series. So, the only solution to fix the problem is to add references about the '''TV production itself'''. ''']]''' 12:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::::{{reply|Ahp101}} but do you think deletion is the only solution? Actually, I found the article previously unsourced and discovered the company to be notable since major top shows are being produced by them now and have been the same for past. So I did a length to breadth search about the company for sources and added them. But since, MrsSnoozyTurtle was not convinced thereafter and did not like it they tagged for deletion. References about the '''TV production itself''' would turn out to <u>be non-reliable, single sourced and promotional in nature</u> and it looks the production house does not involve in self-marketing and promotion of itself. What do you think? ] (]) 13:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I also agree with User:Ahp101. I checked some citations but couldn't find "Blues Productions" in them. <b style="border:1px solid black"> ] ❯❯❯ <b style="color:#0043AF"><small><small>Stay safe</small></small></b> </b> 13:51, 4 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::{{reply|ArnabSaha}} then I am leaving it here. Deletion only looks like the best option then. {{u|MrsSnoozyTurtle}} don't take it otherwise, I took it to a discussion because I thought it to be notable, but since many of them have pointed it to lack of references, then I accept the PRODing of article from you. Happy editing. ] (]) 14:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::@], {{ping|ArnabSaha}} Now, I am kind of feeling confused as ], ] and ] has same type of references as ]. ''']]''' 16:35, 4 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::@], other articles shouldn't be considered as per ] <b style="border:1px solid black"> ] ❯❯❯ <b style="color:#0043AF"><small><small>Stay safe</small></small></b> </b> 05:14, 5 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :{{Reply|Ahp101|ArnabSaha}} Ahp101 don't get confused since you are quite new to Misplaced Pages. Lets wait for others to respond. I think all are eligible, valid and should remain here. ] (]) 18:25, 4 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :* Thanks everyone for the comments. The PROD has been removed and I won't be taking this any further. <p> So if anyone would like to continue the discussion, could it please be done at ]. Or if anyone agrees with me that the company is not likely to be notable, they are welcome to nominate it for discussion at ]. ] 00:30, 5 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Greetings @ MrsSnoozyTurtle | |||
| Though I was already contemplating substantial shifting to new title and restructuring for the ], your constrictive intervention was helpful and inspiring. Now I have substantially deemphasizing organizational part. ({{mono|Next I will be updating a paragraph by taking view of other side too on record to improve article on neutrality front.}}) | |||
| Requesting your feedback for subsection '''Orgnisation''' as restructured @ ]. Please let me know if you still get any sense or feel of advertising and any specific changes you can suggest to the subsection. | |||
| Please also do guide for 'External links' section. I am unaware what is allowed and not allowed about orgnisations in external link section. | |||
| Thanks and warm regards | |||
| ] (]) 16:12, 12 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| : Hello Bookku. Thank you for your kind words, I'm glad to hear that my intervention was helpful. At this point, I think the best thing to do would be submit if for independent review at AfC once you think it is suitable for publication. Regarding the External Links section, my personal opinion is that the current links are no longer valid, now that the topic of the article is activism in general rather than the specific organisation. Regards, ] 22:52, 12 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Greater Bay Airlines edit issues == | |||
| Hi, I've already read the "WP:Not a Crystal Ball" section. | |||
| While some information added in the article of "Greater Bay Airlines" is already a fact, but what you did is just keep undo the work with reference articles. | |||
| Would you explain and did you really read the articles before undoing them? ] (]) 08:19, 13 February 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:52, 16 February 2022
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging