Revision as of 06:03, 10 February 2007 editSp3000 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,308 edits →<nowiki>#REDIRECT</nowiki> []← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:48, 11 February 2007 edit undoQuiddity (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers40,758 edits removed "joke" bannerNext edit → | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
===Fake talk page notification=== | ===Fake talk page notification=== | ||
<div class="usermessage" style="position: absolute; left:10px; top:10px; width:90%" >You have ] (]).</div> | <nowiki><div class="usermessage" style="position: absolute; left:10px; top:10px; width:90%" >You have ] (]).</div></nowiki> | ||
See the message at the top of this page. Someone might be able to suggest some slight CSS tweaks. —]<sup>] ]</sup> 04:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | See the message at the top of this page. Someone might be able to suggest some slight CSS tweaks. —]<sup>] ]</sup> 04:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
*'''Comment''' I have moved the bar down as it was blocking the header from being viewed. '''] ]''' <sup>(])</sup> 01:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' I have moved the bar down as it was blocking the header from being viewed. '''] ]''' <sup>(])</sup> 01:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
** I put it back because where you moved it was blocking your own message about the fact that it is supposed to be repositioned at the top with CSS. —]<sup>] ]</sup> 02:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC) | ** I put it back because where you moved it was blocking your own message about the fact that it is supposed to be repositioned at the top with CSS. —]<sup>] ]</sup> 02:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
*'''Removed''' I've removed it altogether, as it is screwing the page up, plus many editors detest that particular "trick". Seriously. Bad idea. Strong oppose. --] 18:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
{{/In review}} | {{/In review}} |
Revision as of 18:48, 11 February 2007
Motto of the DayParticipants Discussion (Nominations) Guidelines
Nominations (New mottos go here) In review + Specials + Decisions
Frequently Used Ideas Schedule (Upcoming mottos)
Archives (Schedule and nominations)
Motto ShopParticipants Discussion Requests
Templates Closed Requests (1, 2)
Shortcut- ]
Archives |
Before doing anything, read through the list of scheduled mottos and its archives to avoid submitting an identical motto. Your motto should also meet the criteria listed below.
Motto criteria
Your motto should:
- Reflect the community or purpose of Misplaced Pages.
- Be short; it's a motto, not an essay.
- Be funny or serious; but nevertheless, interesting.
- Be powerful; it should provoke a reaction or draw attention, not just another "blah blah blah".
Your motto should not:
- Be offensive or inflamatory.
- Be too obscure (so no little-known Yoda quotes).
Tip: avoid rarely used words that not everyone will understand. Remember, a lot of non-English speakers read Misplaced Pages.
Nomination procedure
To nominate a motto for review, simply add it at the top of the In review section using this code:
=== Example motto === Origin of the motto and your comments. ~~~~ *<First comment goes here> **<Any replies get indented again>
- Anyone can vote for approval. Simply vote Support or Oppose (
'''Support'''
or'''Oppose'''
), and, if possible, leave a reason. Remember to always sign your posts on discussion pages. - Please note that this page uses the bulleted voting style, the same as on Featured picture candidates.
- If you find a motto that is the same or similar to a previously nominated motto, please leave a comment on the new nomination that links to the old nomination, so that others will be able to compare the two.
- After 14 days, it’s decision time—the motto will be moved to the top of the Awaiting decision section. Anyone uninvolved in the discussion is welcome to judge the consensus to either accept or reject a motto. See below for the procedure on how to do this.
Closing procedure
To close a nomination, choose from mottos in the Awaiting decision section. If consensus favors Support of the motto, add '''Approved'''. (reason) ~~~~
to the bottom of the discussion (without the bullet). If vice versa, add '''Rejected'''. (reason) ~~~~
. Then, move the entire discussion to the Decisions to be acted on section. If the margin of votes is too close to determine consensus, or if there aren't enough votes, move it to the top of the In review section, and mark at the bottom of the discussion, '''Reopened'''. (reason) ~~~~
.
To archive a nomination, first make sure that a decision has been made based on consensus. Cut and paste the entire discussion to the top of the latest archive (currently /Archive 3). Then, if the motto was approved, add it to the bottom of the appropriate section of the approved page. Be especially careful to check for any alternative versions (edits) in the discussion. If consensus favors an alternative version, add it to the list instead of the original nomination.
April Fools' Day
The motto for April 1, 2007 will be chosen from the mottos nominated in this section. Please do not move these nominations to the "Awaiting decision" section. Instead, reject and archive mottos with few support votes when it is apparent that consensus favors other mottos. After Saturday, February 24, 2007, one motto will be chosen from consensus. Therefore, it is in your interest to express which motto you think is the best, to ease the closer's job.
Misplaced Pages:Motto of the day/April 1, 2007
It's a coding trick. Wodup 04:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support coding trick. I will strike out this comment if something better comes along. --Tewy 05:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support: Cool. S.D. ¿п? § 12:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support, I think it's cool too. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 21:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
#REDIRECT Special:Mypage
However, make it a real redirect. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 21:52, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- That will generally make people's user page transclude their user page. Is that OK or would it mess up MediaWiki? —Dgies 23:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I guess I don't know what it actually is supposed to do... —ScouterSig 00:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, my original idea was that every time you would like to go to another user's pae, you end up at your own. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 00:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. It will transclude your user page on the page that you're viewing. It will not redirect that page to your page. Wodup 05:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, withdrawn --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 06:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Fake talk page notification
<div class="usermessage" style="position: absolute; left:10px; top:10px; width:90%" >You have ] (]).</div>
See the message at the top of this page. Someone might be able to suggest some slight CSS tweaks. —Dgies 04:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I have moved the bar down as it was blocking the header from being viewed. Tennis DyNamiTe 01:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- I put it back because where you moved it was blocking your own message about the fact that it is supposed to be repositioned at the top with CSS. —Dgies 02:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Removed I've removed it altogether, as it is screwing the page up, plus many editors detest that particular "trick". Seriously. Bad idea. Strong oppose. --Quiddity 18:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
In review
Note: If you are adding nominations for specific dates, holidays or other special reasons please add to the Specials section and NOT HERE.
Also, please check the archives in case the motto has been submitted and subsequently approved before. If this is the case try to think up another motto instead. Please check Misplaced Pages:Motto of the day/Nominations.
Otherwise feel free to add your suggestion, express your opinion on a nomination or create an edited version of a nomination by using these formats:
===] ] with words/phrases linked to the ].=== Origin of the motto and your comments. ~~~~ *'''Support''' your reason... (optional). ~~~~ *'''Oppose''' your reason.... ~~~~ *'''Weak support'''/'''oppose''' your reason.... ~~~~ *''Comment''/''Note'': your comment/note.... ~~~~ *'''Speedy close''' your reason.... ~~~~ ====] ] ].==== '''Edit n''' reason for edit, what was changed, etc.. ~~~~
"If you want to go quickly, go alone. If you want to go far, go together."
It's an African proverb that doesn't just have to mean travel. In Misplaced Pages, if you are removing a red link, that does not need any help (hopefully). But, if you are creating an article, then get some people on board. /Pongy 🍉 23:13, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
"All our dreams can come true, if we have the courage to pursue them."
Based on a quote from Walt Disney. Creating your first article can seem daunting at first, but overcoming that first hurdle is the first step for many of our editors in order for them to eventually become proficient contributors. Besides, we all dream of bringing an article to good status. --(Roundish ⋆t) 23:41, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
"Your legacy is all you will leave behind in this world. So why not leave behind a good one?"
Based on the thought that after you die you won't be able to leave behind anything in this world except for how people think of you. I think it's important to remember that our impressions on people is what will live on after us, so why not leave a good one? Our legacy is who we are after we leave this world. Natalius (talk) 10:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
"Believe you can and you are halfway there."
Quote by Theodore Roosevelt. In my opinion, this is representative of the 5th pillar (Misplaced Pages has no firm rules) because it encourages you to believe you can do something and do it. The 5th pillar also supports that. Many editors don't think they are capable of editing wikipedia. I was the same when I started. TigerScientist Chat > contribs 20:11, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
→ "Veni, vidi vikipedia. Erat in computum."
Based on the famous latin quote (Veni, vidi, vici — I came, I saw, I conquered). The variant means "I came, I saw wikipedia. It was on the computer.", which seems a fitting modern-day variant reflecting the omnipresence of Misplaced Pages on the world's screens. — WT79 12:44, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
“The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.”
― Karl Marx, in the book: Eleven Theses on Feuerbach These words are also inscribed upon his grave, also just because he was a communist, it doesn't rid the quote of its universality. Excutient 06:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
"It is possible to fly without motors, but not without knowledge and skill"
-Wilbur Wright said this, pertaining to how everyone needs to know something to succeed. WolfKanin (talk) 18:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
- Support Gog the Mild (talk) 16:00, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Support Prairie Astronomer (talk) 21:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
- Support -
Flori4nK
10:54, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Faber est quisque Vicipaedia suae.
-'Each is the maker of their encyclopedia'. Adapted from a quote of Sallust in a speech to Caesar. JonsterMonster (talk) 05:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
- Support – nicely quirky. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:01, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
- Support – nice adaption of quote. WT79 13:00, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
- Support – there was a time when motto of the day was almost dead User:Pedant (talk) 05:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Knowledge is power. Power corrupts. Study hard, be evil
Unknown. Landryoliver (talk) 02:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support - I love it! (I have tweaked it into sentence case.) Gog the Mild (talk) 16:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
"We do have a lot in common. The same Earth, the same air, the same sky. Maybe if we started looking at what's the same instead of what's different... well, who knows?"
-Meowth says this in Pokemon: The First Movie. Definitely words to live by. WikiSquirrel42 (talk) 00:59, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
If you can't create or help in an article, kick rocks!
This came into my mind when I was researching for my homework. I modified it to make it related to Misplaced Pages. Democratics (talk) 08:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
If questionable questions are not questioned, questioning will occur.
User:Nikolaiho20:10, 7 February 2016
→ Luke, Join the Dark Side. It's Really Really Cool!
Made me laugh the first time I heard this. TF 15:06, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Does anyone know of any shortcuts for the wikipediaholism page? TF 15:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
→ Luke, Join the Dark Side. It's Really Really Cool!
Edit 1: adds links TF 10:36, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
The Wiki is not the World.
By analogy with "the map is not the territory".
Almonaster (talk) 05:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support: An interesting take-off from "the map is not the territory". Ventric (talk) 21:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Clearer with a link (ie, not the territory) Larataguera (talk) 12:58, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
- Support: as per Larataguera User:Pedant (talk) 05:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Edit Misplaced Pages, edit the world!
BlAcKhAt9(9 (talk) 18:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support A nice riff on Hack the Planet! or something of the like. Ventric (talk) 01:58, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
→ • Misplaced Pages pro omnibus, omnes pro Misplaced Pages • derived from Unus pro omnibus, omnes pro uno
Since there was no reaction to: Has this motto been suggested before? this might be a better place to ask Lotje (talk) 15:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
"i am manado, i was here from the beginning and now i will proclaim the end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Okamialvis (talk • contribs) 19:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Lacking relatable language. Latin is cool, but this is not. Ventric (talk) 21:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
→ • Just because something is funny, it doesn't mean that it it's not important.
• Just because something is important, it doesn't mean that it's not funny.
• One of the few things worth taking seriously is humor.
From Mick Goodrick's book The Advancing Guitarist, where he sets you up for some examples of "the effective use of space" in music, and presents you with a nearly blank page.
It's a useful reminder not to take yourself too seriously, and that humorous essays do have a use. Eman235/talk 14:08, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support. True. --Warp3 (talk) 04:27, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
→ Yet I'll not shed her blood;
Nor soar that whiter skin of hers than snow,
And smooth as monumental alabaster.
William Shakespeare (1564–1616), Othello (1565), Act V, Scene II. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 15:34, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
→ Kid — the next time I say, 'Let's go someplace like Bolivia', let's go someplace like Bolivia.
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (1969). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 11:27, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
→ Thou who hast
The fatal gift of beauty.
Lord George Gordon Noel Byron (1788–1824), Childe Harold's Pilgrimage (1818), Canto IV. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 08:02, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
→ Except for a single, very powerful radio emission aimed at Jupiter the four million year old black monolith has remained completely inert, its origin and purpose still a total mystery.
2001: A Space Odyssey (1968). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 07:56, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
→ A rosebud set with little wilful thorns.
And sweet as English air could make her, she.
Alfred Tennyson (1809–1892), The Princess: Prologue (1847). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 08:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
→ They're not gonna catch us. We're on a mission from God.
The Blues Brothers (1978). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 08:17, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
→ Her beauty hangs upon the cheek of night
Like a rich jewel in an Ethiop's ear.
William Shakespeare (1564–1616), Romeo and Juliet, Act I, Scene V (1597). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 10:10, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
→ It's a far, far better thing I do than I have ever done. It's a far, far better rest I go to than I have ever known.
A Tale of Two Cities (1935), based upon Charles Dickens' 1859 historical novel. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 10:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
→ Old as I am, for ladies' love unfit,
The power of beauty I remember yet.
John Dryden (1631–1700), Fables, Ancient and Modern (1700), "Cymon and Iphigenia (From Boccace)". –pjoef (talk • contribs) 07:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
→ — "I'm in love with you." — "Snap out of it!"
Moonstruck (1987). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 07:38, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
→ Beauty provoketh thieves sooner than gold.
William Shakespeare (1564–1616), As You Like It, Act I, Scene III (1623). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 10:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support I enjoy this one. Ventric (talk) 21:18, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yup, definitely like this one, despite my mild contempt for anything Shakespearean. Ghinga7 (talk) 18:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
- Support. Sweet and simple. Huggums537 (talk) 21:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
→ Well, if you get a good break, you'll be out of Tehachapi in 20 years and you can come back to me then. I hope they don't hang you, precious, by that sweet neck... Yes, angel, I'm gonna send you over. The chances are you'll get off with life. That means if you're a good girl, you'll be out in 20 years. I'll be waiting for you. If they hang you, I'll always remember you.
The Maltese Falcon (1931). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 10:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
→ And she is fair, and fairer than that word.
William Shakespeare (1564–1616), The Merchant of Venice, Act I, Scene I (1623). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:20, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
→ I'm such a fool, such an old fool. These are only tears of gratitude — an old maid's gratitude for the crumbs offered...You see, no one ever called me darling before.
Now, Voyager (1942). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:11, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
→ Is she not passing fair?
William Shakespeare (1564–1616), The Two Gentlemen of Verona, Act IV, Scene IV (1623). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 07:24, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
→ I didn't recognize you. You should lay off those candy bars...You're a mess, honey.
Touch of Evil (1958). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 07:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
→ Non sum qualis eram
("I am not what I was")
Quintus Horatius Flaccus (65–8 BC), Carmina 4/1:3. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 09:11, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
→ Never be it said
That Fate itself could awe the soul of Richard.
Hence, babbling dreams; you threaten here in vain;
Conscience, avaunt, Richard's himself again!
Hark! the shrill trumpet sounds. To horse! away!
My soul's in arms, and eager for the fray.
Colley Cibber (1671–1757), Shakespeare's Richard III (Altered), Act V, Scene III.
- Oppose. Too much Shakespearean babble over a single link about edit warring. These are usually much shorter and are able to compact more informative useful links into a smaller structure. Huggums537 (talk) 21:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
→ No patty fingers, if you please. The proprieties at all times.
The Quiet Man (1952). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 08:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Unidentifiable and vague. Ventric (talk) 21:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
→ Non qui parum habet, set qui plus cupit, pauper est
("It is not he who has little, but he who wants more, who is the pauper")
Seneca the Younger, Epistulae morales ad Lucilium, 2:6. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 08:27, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
→ Non qui parum habet, set qui plus cupit, pauper est
("It is not he who has little, but he who wants more, who is the pauper")
Edit 1 with a different set of links. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 08:27, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
→ We must have bloody noses and cracked crowns,
And pass them current too. God's me, my horse!
William Shakespeare (1564–1616), Henry IV, Part 1 (1598), act 2, scene 3. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 08:07, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose. Too esoteric for my taste and probably for the basic understanding of the general public as well. Huggums537 (talk) 21:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
→ Frau Bleucher.
Young Frankenstein (1974). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 07:57, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
→ Non possunt primi esse omnes omni in tempore
("Not everyone can occupy the first rank forever")
Decimus Laberius (c. 105 – 43 BC). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 07:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
→ Fight, gentlemen of England! fight, bold yeomen!
Draw, archers, draw your arrows to the head!
Spur your proud horses hard, and ride in blood;
Amaze the welkin with your broken staves!
William Shakespeare (1564–1616), Richard III, act V, scene VIII. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 07:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose. I think the last two lines and links got mixed up with each other because neither fits either one... Huggums537 (talk) 21:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
→ Did you ever reach a point in your life, where you say to yourself: 'This is the best I'm ever going to look, the best I'm ever going to feel, the best I'm ever going to do', and it ain't that great?
City Slickers (1991). –pjoef (talk • contribs) 06:58, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Memorable scene in the movie, but taken without all that context it's just whiny and depressing. Peter J. Mello (talk) 06:42, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose Too long. A motto should be quick and simple. It doesn't ring out and last in your head because it is long. I don't want whole long sentences as mottos. TigerScientist Chat > contribs 20:14, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
→ Every passing minute is another chance to turn it all around.
Vanilla Sky (2001) DrkBlueXG (talk) 20:49, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support Great one. Ventric (talk) 21:21, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Support Hard to think of a way this isn't perfectly suited to the project. Peter J. Mello (talk) 06:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- Support short and sweet. Jake (talk) 06:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
"When the plumbing gets tough, the tough get plumbing!" -Salvador Drainato Long John Spaghetti, Meme Lord 02:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC) (Added by Long John Spaghetti) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Long John Spaghetti (talk • contribs)
"Live a life that you think someday you will be proud of. If you think you don't, have the courage to start all over again." -benjamin button — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.121.187.253 (talk) 05:58, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
"The day's young but I'm not." -Hey breej Hey breej (talk) 20:00, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
"In a week, I will be donating $1,000,000 to a recipient determined by the word count of the Misplaced Pages article about this event. If it's even, the money goes to pro-choice activists. If it's odd, pro-life." - 'Ridge 22:32, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Awaiting decision
The following preview has been approved for all audiences.
From the disclaimer before each movie trailer. And yes, I did press the preview button before saving this. bibliomaniac15 01:16, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Would Support "...approved for all audiences", as the movie trailers are not approved by all audiences. Wodup 01:29, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Per Wodup; please check to make sure it's correct, but otherwise it's a nice motto. --Tewy 01:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support version by Wodup. S.D. ¿п? § 03:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Wodup's version. Excellent, btw. ♥Tohru Honda13♥ 03:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Wodup's version. Peacent 12:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support, but... the version at the movie says "approved for all audiences, which would seem to make sense in this context, too. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support ... "Show preview" is for n00bs. "Show changes" is for geeks Template:Emot. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 05:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support per... everybody --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 09:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Changed to "for," not "by." — Preceding unsigned comment added by bibliomaniac15 (talk • contribs)
- Support I approve. :-) | AndonicO 23:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Support Truly ingenious... DannyQuack 03:54, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
--May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 08:48, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. It's got potential, but I don't like the links. WP:BITE and WP:PA don't have a cause and effect relationship like the crime and the time. Wodup 09:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: then like this? --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 09:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. That's fine, or you can have different crimes (just pick a policy violation for which you get blocked). Wodup 09:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support: Nice one. S.D. ¿п? § 15:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. --Tewy 19:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Support--Tohru Honda13 21:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Yuser31415 20:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. -FisherQueen (Talk) 12:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support - --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 09:19, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
I pity the fool who vandalizes Misplaced Pages!
Form Mr. T's famous catchphrase. Does this sound too uncivil? Eh... --Tohru Honda13 05:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Why not "I pity the fool." | AndonicO 12:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Is that better? --Tohru Honda13 18:45, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Been done before. --Tewy 19:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to the Wiki Age
Might have been done before/lame. Tell me if you think so too. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 05:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. I can't find any evidence that it's been used before. --Tewy 20:32, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Good motto. Peacent 13:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Note: In case this may be hard to understand, here are edits 1 and 2 (tell me if the "the"s are excessive, I'll change it):
- The Stone Age, the Iron Age, and now, the Wiki Age.
- The Stone Age, the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the Wiki Age.
- Support edit 1. Three is a good number of items (as opposed to edit 2). --Tewy 22:57, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Edit 1. S.D. ¿п? § 23:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Around here, geeks run things.
Similar to the one below. Open for comments! | AndonicO 23:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose; sounds a bit discountive of n00bs. Yuser31415 05:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not everyone on Misplaced Pages is a geek, so it's unfair to say that they "run things", because everyone has an equal say. --Tewy 19:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. S.D. ¿п? § 03:46, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages: where nerds fit in.
Similar to the one above. Open for comments! | AndonicO 23:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support great motto. Yuser31415 05:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. S.D. ¿п? § 15:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong support I'm a nerd...and proud of it! :D --Tohru Honda13 18:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support. There are others on Misplaced Pages besides nerds. --Tewy 19:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: How about adding "with others" to the quote? S.D. ¿п? § 22:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- But that would more or less ruin the purpose. What about "Misplaced Pages: where even nerds fit in."? | AndonicO 13:01, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support old version. Peacent 13:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Wait, I can't buy that yet. I've got to check Misplaced Pages first!
-AstroHurricane001 23:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. What does this refer to? Are you checking to see how good a product is, or are you just distracted by Misplaced Pages? --Tewy 01:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: This isn't about me, it's just a motto. I meant that wikipedia often contains valuable information about products, places, etc. AstroHurricane001 22:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant "you" to be "someone", not specifically you, AstroHurricane001. In any case I can't support, because not all products pass notability, and Misplaced Pages isn't the place to review the latest products. --Tewy 23:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I first thought this was saying that Wiki is a consumer-report/guide. SkierRMH 07:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Help! Call the police! Someone violated 3RR!
-AstroHurricane001 23:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support either. It's alright, but nothing special. --Tewy 01:04, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support It's a funny motto IMHO. | AndonicO 22:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment By the way, why not "Help! Call the police! Someone violated 3RR!" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AndonicO (talk • contribs) 22:21, 19 January 2007 (UTC).
- Comment Sure, that works. Support new version. AstroHurricane001 22:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. S.D. ¿п? § 00:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Tohru Honda13 05:26, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Yuser31415 05:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support AndonicO's version. Peacent 13:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Misplaced Pages is not a police state. - Gilliam 00:32, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- comment: What about the Misplaced Pages police? Are they real or just a myth?
Misplaced Pages ≠ the world...yet.
-AstroHurricane001 23:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support edit 1. It's getting there...
And I would take off the "s" on "anyways", as a little better grammar.--Tewy 01:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC) - Weak support. I think I'd go with "Misplaced Pages ≠ the world... yet." If it were up to me. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support FisherQueen's version | AndonicO 22:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support New version. AstroHurricane001 22:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support —ScouterSig 23:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support FisherQueen's version. Yuser31415 05:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support new version! SkierRMH 07:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support version by FisherQueen —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DannyQuack (talk • contribs) 21:52, 20 January 2007 (UTC).
- Support per above. S.D. ¿п? § 22:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support, though I think it would be kinda funny if we had some link for "the world". Just a thought. daNASCAT --Tim Quievryn 23:54, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- comment: Is this better? AstroHurricane001 00:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support- Sure is --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 00:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I can see your house from here.
Can I see your house from here? FisherQueen (Talk) 19:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Umm...What does this have to do with Misplaced Pages? --Tohru Honda13 19:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. "My house" has problems with Misplaced Pages:Notability. --Tewy 20:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- This works better as a Google Earth motto. --Tewy 20:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose: I agree. S.D. ¿п? § 00:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose as there are SO MANY different links. Also, I agree with Tewy. —ScouterSig 23:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose don't know what this is supposed to be referencing... and way too many links. SkierRMH 07:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per too many links. Tohru Honda13 19:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
This is an encyclopaedia, not a tourist brochure
Or This is an encylopaedia, not a dictionary. This was applied before to people, but not objects. Simply south 11:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. While this may be true, it's pretty dull. --Tewy 01:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tewy. S.D. ¿п? § 00:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose while I agree with the sentiment, don't see this really as a motto. SkierRMH 07:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages is where it's at
AxG (First edit day today) (sign here) 00:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support. Not really catchy, but true. --Tewy 04:03, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. S.D. ¿п? § 00:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support I like it. —ScouterSig 23:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support Agree with Tewy, but see nothing "fatal". SkierRMH 07:02, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
I thought it sounds good. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 23:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak oppose: Sorry for this but i have found through some experience that this is not always true. Simply south 11:41, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support with a strong preference for large acts of kindness. :-) | AndonicO 22:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. S.D. ¿п? § 00:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support This needs to be reinforced wherever possible as of late. SkierRMH 07:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment to my own motto - Note that a similar one has been done before --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 00:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- This is borderline similarity, in my opinion. It might be fine to approve this one, especially considering how much support it's gotten. --Tewy 02:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment to my own motto - Note that a similar one has been done before --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 00:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge is infinite, Misplaced Pages is not.
I just thought of it AstroHurricane001 00:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Proving that Misplaced Pages doesn't have to be infinite to contain nearly the sum of human knowledge. Similar to my other mottos. Also, can I make more mottos? AstroHurricane001 22:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Of course! We would love to approve more mottos. Add as many as you feel are worthy. --Tewy 22:44, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. How about "Knowledge is infinite, Misplaced Pages is not."? That way it doesn't sound like Misplaced Pages is lacking information unintentionally. --Tewy 22:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Sure, fine by me, but what does that have to do with a directory? AstroHurricane001 22:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- That was the best link I could find that said Misplaced Pages is not a collection of all the knowledge (including the small things) in the world. --Tewy 00:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
To complete Misplaced Pages is to complete human knowledge.
Just thought of it. AstroHurricane001 00:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. I really like it. Not only does it provide the answer to when Misplaced Pages will be completed, it also shows the comprehensiveness of the project. --Tewy 01:02, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Support: Great motto! —S.D. ¿п? 01:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. That's deep. Wodup 04:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Support This is so true. Great job indeed! --Tohru Honda13 06:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Extreme Support; flawless, I'll say! Flawlessly flawless! This is essentially what Misplaced Pages is all about! -- Altiris Exeunt 11:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Truly wonderful, your idea is, AstroHurricane001. --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 11:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- CommentI wish there was a Barnstar for thinking up an awesome motto. AstroHurricane001 would totally deserve it. :) --Tohru Honda13 23:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: We should create it! —S.D. ¿п? 23:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Great motto. AxG (sign here) 23:45, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Thanks for the support. I never realized it was such a great motto. According to some sources, however, they say that Misplaced Pages will never be completed, maybe because to complete knowledge would require nearly an infinite amount of info, although verifible, notable, and credible info may not number to infinity. AstroHurricane001 00:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support What can I say? (litterally) | AndonicO 22:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support (but remember to delete that vanity article!). Yuser31415 05:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment What vanity article? AstroHurricane001 16:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Should there be a link to the goal of wikipedia, to give free human knowledge to the world? AstroHurricane001 00:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Support This definitly sounds like a great motto because it not only reflects what Misplaced Pages is, but it also reflects the fact that it is always growing. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gbraing (talk • contribs) 01:08, 1 February 2007 (UTC).
- Ooooooh...I didn't support this? --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 10:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
The starting source of Misplaced Pages shall never run out of ideas.
Just thought of it. AstroHurricane001 00:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Your other motto is a hit; this one isn't. Wodup 03:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support What's wrong with it? I like it. Wow, AstroHurricane is on a roll here...in my opinion :). --Tohru Honda13 04:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Does it mean something that I just don't get? I guess I don't get the starting source thing. Wodup 05:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm also confused about that. Could you clarify? It may involve modifying the motto. --Tewy 01:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- comment What I literally meant was, Knowledge is infinite, so Misplaced Pages keeps growing, which means it doesn't run out of topics. AstroHurricane001 22:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm also confused about that. Could you clarify? It may involve modifying the motto. --Tewy 01:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Does it mean something that I just don't get? I guess I don't get the starting source thing. Wodup 05:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Another motto in development
"Vandalize us once Shame on you, Vandalize us twice ______" with the blank being along the lines of block/ban. Any suggestions/changes? 1 day to go...! User:Sp3000 06:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. The original saying is Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. (from Wikiquote). Since I can't see how it would be "shame on us" :-), my suggestion (stolen from October 25) is "Vandalize us once, shame on you. Vandalize us twice, shame on...wait, you can't vandalize when you're blocked."
- Blocks don't seem to happen on the second edit. It normally seems to be the 5th or 10th. (Should i be commenting here on it?) Simply south 20:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's a big reason this motto is a problem, the wording just doesn't fit how the blocking policy is... --Tewy 22:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh! Maybe April Fools jokes...I'll look into that if I find the time... --Tewy 22:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's a big reason this motto is a problem, the wording just doesn't fit how the blocking policy is... --Tewy 22:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Blocks don't seem to happen on the second edit. It normally seems to be the 5th or 10th. (Should i be commenting here on it?) Simply south 20:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
been done before :-( --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 23:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- You're right, it's probably too close to that one. --Tewy 23:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
You can do it when you Misplaced Pages it
Probably dull. Taken from B&Q. I was wrong down there. Is it possible to replace "do it" ith something else that rhymes, if possible? Simply south 11:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. It is rather dull. My best suggestion is "You can do it when you SPEW it." --Tewy 20:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- ...Which I support. --Tewy 20:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Heh, funny. Support Tewy's edit. --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 21:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Edit 1. —S.D. ¿п? 01:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support edit one | AndonicO 22:14, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Think inside the box.
I saw Tewy's nomination and thought of this. It links to the Misplaced Pages Sandbox. Wodup 00:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. I like the idea, and I don't think the issue of the two being too similar is a problem, especially if they come one after the other. --Tewy 01:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 02:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support - true, true. --Tohru Honda13 04:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Tennis DyNamiTe 01:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. AxG (First edit day today) (sign here) 00:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Preview is better though. :-P | AndonicO 22:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support and run the two back-to-back! SkierRMH 06:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
0 to 60 (reverts) in less than 30 minutes!
SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 12:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support. I get what this is saying, but it doesn't make AVB sound very efficient (30 minutes for the bot vs. 6.3 seconds for the car). --Tewy 21:43, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Support very funny, and AVB is my hero! Arjun 03:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Support that's funny but if I remember right from personal experience, AVB can do 60+ reverts in less than 3 minutes. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 10:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Vandalize is not an option.
--Smcafirst or Nick • Sign Here • Chit-Chat • Contribs at 21:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's a bit dull. --Tewy 21:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. I agree with Tewy. —S.D. ¿п? 04:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Have a break, Have a Wikibreak
A variation on the KitKat adverts. Simply south 14:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. A bit dull. --Tewy 21:46, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose: Sounds a bit repetitive. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose. As per above, it sounds pretty dull, and repetitive. After all, we should not advise people to get away rom wikipedia, since we need more workforce, editing and reverting vandalism. --Smcafirst or Nick • Sign Here • Chit-Chat • Contribs at 00:59, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose As someone that watches c. 1 hour of TV a week, I had no idea what this was referring to... don't know, but maybe a bit too US-centric? SkierRMH 06:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
A picture is worth a thousand words
Alternate A picture is worth 1,000 words
To bring attention to the wonderful work done over there! SkierRMH 09:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Whilst this idea has been submitted before, or at least a play on this, i don't think it has been linked to Featured pictures. It is a good way to sum it up and as i like this, Support. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Simply south (talk • contribs).
- Comment. The other nomination can be found at Misplaced Pages:Motto of the day/Nominations/Archive 2#A fact is worth a thousand speculations.. --Tewy 20:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. The actual "motto" actually appears at Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates, so I would rather it link there. I also prefer the original version. --Tewy 20:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support original and version by Tewy. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support as Sdpi does. | AndonicO 22:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Every day and in every way, we're getting better and better.
I found this in a movie, The Pink Panther Strikes Again. I don't think this needs any links, self-explanatory I think. --Tohru Honda 03:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. --Tewy 21:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Hmm... I just saw the movie, but can't remember. HAHA! Did you see the part where Clouseua--never mind. | AndonicO 22:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
It can get pretty hot when one doesn't keep their cool.
--May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 19:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Cool Arjun 22:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. --Tewy 04:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Yuser31415 06:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support - short & to the point! SkierRMH 09:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support | AndonicO 22:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Tell the Wikitruth!
Yes! 82.2.139.21 12:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. All that's unique about this motto is the "wiki" prefix. It's not very interesting. --Tewy 21:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Ditto. -- Kicking222 04:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Make it 3. SkierRMH 09:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose IV. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Cinco. --Tohru Honda13 00:11, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Roku. // PoeticDecay 00:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Sapta. Arjun 03:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - Octo. The Wikitruth is false. --Gray PorpoiseYour wish is my command! 04:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I think this is enough consensus for rejected...if this goes on, what would nine be in French? :)--♥Tohru Honda13♥ 04:57, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: "Nine" is "neuf." Cheers! S.D. ¿п? § 13:17, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
It's wikipedia.org, not wikipedia.com.
Emphasizing that we are a non-profit organization, and not a for-profit company. Yuser31415 23:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong support. Sooo true. --Tewy 00:50, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- VERY Strong Support: Can this be tommorow's motto? LOVE IT RyGuy Sign Here! My Journal 15:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, this is what we need. This is what makes wikipedia the greatest project in the world. Arjun 03:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support And I still type in .com via force of habit ;) SkierRMH 09:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support, very good indeed! --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 21:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Support. Good emphasis on .org. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Extreme Strong Support. This is the best motto ever, and as per above, I strongly support this motto. --Smcafirst or Nick • Sign Here • Chit-Chat • Contribs at 21:17, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Why, thank you :). Yuser31415 05:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Full Support - I think the other users kinda said it better than I could ;) // PoeticDecay 00:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support WP:SNOW? ;-) | AndonicO 22:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
I get by with a little help from my friends.
Uh, it's The Beatles. Duh. Anyway, I like where the links go, but if you feel differently, feel free to suggest alternatives. I'm also not sure whether or not I like the period at the end. -- Kicking222 22:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- How about changing the Help:Contents to Misplaced Pages:Help desk? Otherwise, i think it is good so support. Simply south 22:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- I like that change. It is done. -- Kicking222 23:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Yuser31415 23:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support. "Get by" sounds a little like editing is a struggle. As for the period, I think the general trend is that if it's a sentence, add a period; so keep it. --Tewy 00:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support w/ change; and coming from someone who got the Beatles reference immediately, I understood the "get by" ok; it might be misconstrued per Tewy's comment by those who aren't too familiar w/ the reference. SkierRMH 09:13, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support I confess I didn't identify this with the Beatles until you mentioned it. | AndonicO 22:05, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
The place to go, for what you need to know.
Based on Sky Travel's slogan 'The place to go, before you go'. If anyone else could think of some different links, that would be nice. AxG (sign here) 21:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Yuser31415 23:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. --Tewy 00:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Added a period; punctuation is important. :-) | AndonicO 22:03, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well technically, that's not a sentence, so a period isn't really required. :-) --Tewy 23:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- It's an understood subject. It's like in those diagramming studies from school; I always used to get the "(you)" part wrong. :-( | AndonicO 23:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well technically, that's not a sentence, so a period isn't really required. :-) --Tewy 23:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
We sense you, Vandals.
--May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 10:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Shouldn't that be "sense you"? Anyway, i don't really find it very imaginative unless you can explain. Simply south 14:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Blast! I can't believe I did it again! Plus I have a spellchecker! Oh, well, the motto, it basically states that we can neutralise vandalism on the spot. --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 14:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support. It is a little creepy, but a good reminder to them. --Tewy 03:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support I...feel...vandals!!! ;-) | AndonicO 22:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages: Land of the free, home of the brave.
Taken from the Pledge of Allegiance Star Spangled Banner. Referring to Be bold when editing Misplaced Pages. Thoughts? Tohru Honda 05:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- It's actually from The Star-Spangled Banner... In any case, I wonder if there's anywhere to link "Land of the free" to. --Tewy 05:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Actually at first, I was thinking to leave "Wikpedia:" out of the motto, and instead link Land of the Free to Misplaced Pages. Would that be better? --Tohru Honda 05:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking more along the lines of Free content, but I can't find any links in the project namespace. --Tewy 05:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- How about "Misplaced Pages: Land of the free, home of the brave"? --Tewy 18:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- I like that, consider it done! --Tohru Honda 19:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- How about "Misplaced Pages: Land of the free, home of the brave"? --Tewy 18:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- I was thinking more along the lines of Free content, but I can't find any links in the project namespace. --Tewy 05:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Actually at first, I was thinking to leave "Wikpedia:" out of the motto, and instead link Land of the Free to Misplaced Pages. Would that be better? --Tohru Honda 05:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Not terribly catchy, but good links. --Tewy 19:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support--TeckWizContribs@ 23:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- support per Tewy 12.74.209.206 23:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Has good links. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support I don't mean to be pedantic (actually I do :), but Misplaced Pages isn't land. | AndonicO 22:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm. it's a metaphor (I think). Misplaced Pages is a land of information. Sorry I just made that up. :D --Tohru Honda13 05:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Love it! futurebird 07:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages, the ink saving encyclopedia
No ink to run out of. AxG (sign here) 04:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. There are lots of mottos that deal with saving paper. I don't know if this is too similar. In any case, I would prefer it as "Misplaced Pages: saves ink" or just "Saves ink". --Tewy 05:25, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support This isn't about saving paper, but I agree with Tewy on the shortening part. | AndonicO 21:59, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support, as "Saves ink". --Tewy 23:44, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support "Misplaced Pages: saves ink". Just having "Saves ink" on a user page may not provide enough context. Wodup 04:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
We are watching you
Or it might be better as We are watching you\you. Or is this variety a bit complicated? Simply south 20:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support I prefer the original version. It is good. Why1991 04:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support - A good one. 12.74.209.206 23:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support This one was actually rejected before (something about it being creepy). It was before I discovered MOTD, and I would have supported back then if I could have. Tennis DyNamiTe 00:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support - brings attention to that watchlist nicely! SkierRMH 09:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support with exclamation mark In Soviet Russia, you watches we! Lame, I know. :-) | AndonicO 21:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages a weekly CD containing 1 article per week.
Just like them magazines where you get a book/part etc. AxG (sign here) 21:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose- I don't really get it except for the "Collect over 6,930,455" part. How do you collect weeks? Not very catchy either. DannyQuack 21:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't really get it, either. It's not even coherent, much less catchy or funny. -- Kicking222 22:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment- I get this but it lacks a few links. I'm a little neutral about this one. Cheers to 2007! User:Sp3000 22:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- oppose I don't get it... 12.74.209.206 23:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose Que? I don't understand the reference, sorry :( SkierRMH 09:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think what the nomination means is at one article per week you collect over 6,930,455 weeks. Wodup 00:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
It's a job
Simply south 15:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC) (I might be watching Teen Titans too much)
- Support as "It's a job ... that we enjoy!" Yuser31415 21:14, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support I like the original. Good. Why1991 04:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose It's just not creative enough. Unless it's a reference or something I don't get. --Goodface87
Hey vandals! Try getting to the articles through 48,463,546 users!
- Will they? I think not! RyGuy 14:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Yuser31415 21:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. Precisely because it encourages them to try. --Tewy 23:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tewy, that's basically reverse psychology. --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 19:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment If it was revers phsychology then he would happily encourage them to vandalize, and make the vandals wonder why he was so willing to let them vandalize therefore making them not want to vandalize. I think what he is trying to say is that there is no way anyone could vandalize with this many people blocking them. My point is that it is not exactly reverse phsychology. Oh and by the way I like the motto and will happily Support it. Why1991 04:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose as my hacker
friendsacquaintances would take this as a challenge. SkierRMH 09:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC) - Oppose seems to violate WP:BEANS. Tennis DyNamiTe 22:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose It encourages the vandals to vandalize Misplaced Pages which is not a good idea.--PrestonH | talk | contribs | editor review | 05:19, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
48,463,546 people working overtime... and unpaid.
It's a 💕. AxG (sign here) 17:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support, as "48,463,546 people working overtime...and unpaid." --Tewy 19:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment, changed grammer, any better. AxG (sign here) 19:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support - it's okay, but it makes it look like we don't enjoy working on this project ... IMO. Apart from that, it's great! Yuser31415 20:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support - It's great but I'm just not quite sure about "unpaid." It sounds like a job, when it's a bit more of a hobby for me. Cheers to 2007! User:Sp3000 06:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment What about: 48,463,546 people working around the clock... and for free. AxG (sign here) 22:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- No need for the last "and"; support. --Tewy 23:42, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment What about: 48,463,546 people working around the clock... and for free. AxG (sign here) 22:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support I like any of the versions. --Goodface87
- Support I like AXG's version the best. Why1991 04:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- This is getting confusing for me, do people like: 1, 48,463,546 people working overtime... and unpaid. or 2, 48,463,546 people working around the clock... and for free. AxG (sign here) 04:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- If this helps to clarify, I like it as "48,463,546 people working around the clock... for free." --Tewy 05:22, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- This is getting confusing for me, do people like: 1, 48,463,546 people working overtime... and unpaid. or 2, 48,463,546 people working around the clock... and for free. AxG (sign here) 04:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support all. —S.D. ¿п? 13:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support I like the version Tewy does best as well. | AndonicO 21:55, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
A do it yourself encyclopedia.
Everyone knows about DIY. AxG (sign here) 17:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. Yuser31415 20:46, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Why not "The do-it-yourself encyclopedia"? Tennis DyNamiTe 22:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support edit 1 only. I thought the wording was funny on the original. --Tewy 22:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- support i like it. South Wales 00:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Edit 1. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support version with the definitive article. —ScouterSig 19:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support I really like it plus I believe that it is do it yourself with an R like it says here. Why1991 04:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Tennis' version | AndonicO 21:53, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Where are your two cents?
See also: My two cents (idiom). Although this motto can be linked to a lot of pages in Misplaced Pages, I think this one encourages RFA participation. SD31415 · SIGN HERE 00:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Should it be linked to WP:POV or do you think this is a bad idea? Simply south 18:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- This motto could be linked to many places. Suggestions for better places to link than WP:RFA are welcome. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support as is. | AndonicO 21:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. I fixed the grammer in the heading (is → are). --Tewy 23:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I can't believe I missed it! Thanks! S.D. ¿п? § 00:27, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Think outside the box.
A little bit of awareness. --Tewy 03:27, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support ... Gosh you kind of run out of things to say after commenting on a reasonable amount of mottos... It's good!!!--¿Why1991 04:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Good idea :). I don't have userboxes...I have userrounds (for those is Firefox) — Arjun 00:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support, even though I have exactly 10 userboxes on my userpage. Yuser31415 20:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support-awareness is good :) --TeckWizContribs@ 23:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:42, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support per Why1991. :-) | AndonicO 21:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Wait, wait. We're not here to start WW III.
Hope this sums up 3RR and the admin equivalent, the wheel war. Yuser31415 06:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support - very funny and apt. Happy new year. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support per Vanderdecken. —sd31415 (sign here) 12:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. --Tewy 19:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Not much to say other than "yep"...--¿Why1991 04:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Very good. Tennis DyNamiTe 18:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
SupportI can't really understand that WW III thing unless it's supposed to be sort of like World War III- Support Yes, that's what it means. | AndonicO 21:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
An operator will be with you shortly.
Pointing to the wonderfully useful immediate help "desk" SkierRMH 08:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support. I think it's a good way to get people over there. --Tewy 21:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support: Good one. —sd31415 (sign here) 22:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support Funny and true. --TeckWizContribs@ 23:28, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support - I enjoy helping out on CAT:HELP. Yuser31415 06:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support - Raises awareness. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Like TechWiz said "Funny and True".--¿Why1991 04:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. ...very shortly... Wodup 01:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support ibid. —ScouterSig 19:11, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support It's always empty! | AndonicO 21:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh yeah? Well my encyclopedia could beat-up your encyclopedia.
Derived from "Oh yeah? Well my dad could beat-up your dad." DannyQuack 17:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak support. Cheesy, but in a funny way. --Tewy 05:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support. —sd31415 (sign here) 22:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Oh, that age-old rivalry... —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support without quotation marks. | AndonicO 21:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure if I should put quotation marks or not when I posted the motto. DannyQuack 21:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
It is always ironic when a Wikipedian misspells "encyclopidic."
--Tewy 00:32, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support I like it.--¿Why1991 18:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support - very true. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support I'm trying to stop myself from correcting the spelling... | AndonicO 21:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you
Right from Rule of Three (Wiccan)SkierRMH 08:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. A similar motto was suggested here. This is a little different, however; could you think of some better links that tie the quote to Misplaced Pages? My thoughts were along the lines of "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." or "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." --Tewy 19:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment The old "write" or "edit" unto others was a bit too confusing. Was going for the Scriptural/Bible reference here. I like the "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." better than my original citation! SkierRMH 03:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak support edit 1 (to WP:AGF). It's a good message, but not terribly catchy. --Tewy 20:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support Edit 1. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:36, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support the one that has a link to WP:AGF. | AndonicO 21:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
Veni, vidi, vici.
Et tu Brute?SkierRMH 08:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Been done before. --Tewy 18:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Withdrawn - I searched for "Veni, vidi, vici" not the "Wiki". SkierRMH 03:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Next time try searching for just one word (such as "Veni"); it will yield more results than searching for the exact wording. --Tewy 20:42, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
"To be or not to be, that is the question".
Act III, scene I SkierRMH 08:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I don't think the link to Help:Contents is necessary. --Tewy 18:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - last link removed. - Other two are where the question "to be" or "not to be" are discussed. SkierRMH 03:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Actually, now that I think about it again, I don't know if the whole last section is needed...but it's good either way. --Tewy 03:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support I like it and think that you should keep the whole entire thing the way it is because it would take away from the quote that this is derived from (To be or not to be, that is the qestion).--¿Why1991 19:00, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Maybe the question link could be to 'where's my article gone LOL!!11eleventyone'. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Alright! (Wait... does the green circle-X mean it's approved and my vote is too late? Because it doesn't say "Approved."... —ScouterSig 20:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Some people vote using those symbols (check out commons). Though, you do have good reason to suspect, seeing as Vanderdecken is an overseer. --Tewy 02:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support | AndonicO 21:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. This is really quite clever. Superm401 - Talk 03:17, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
"Badges? We ain't got no... stinking badges!"
Tribute to barnstars!SkierRMH 07:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I don't think all those links are necessary. The only one I see working in this motto is to Misplaced Pages:Barnstars. --Tewy 18:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - links fixed. SkierRMH 03:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. While a user with barnstars may edit well, it does not mean that a user without barnstars can't edit any better. So as I see it, it doesn't matter whether a user has "badges" or not, this motto doesn't have much relevence with Misplaced Pages. It's a good idea, but I don't think it's the best. --Tewy 02:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose - The idea is good but I think it may be offensive to some. Cheers to 2007! User:Sp3000 06:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tewy. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:33, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
It's a little thing called "Style". Look it up some time.
This is one of Bender's quotes from Futurama. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 03:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - 'tis a bit esoteric; Bender is famous for his catchphrase "Bite my shiny metal ass!", which I'd love to see as a motto (Maybe on 4/1/07?), but think that would get shot down really quick!! ;o)SkierRMH 08:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think it should link more like It's a little thing called "Style". Look it up some time. --Tewy 03:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- I vote 'Suport on the second version, with only one link. I know that the quotes are supposed to be somewhat well known, but it is good enough out of context; anyone who recognises it as Bender's will just get extra. —ScouterSig 19:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support Tewy's version I copyedited the header, I hope you don't mind. :-) | AndonicO 21:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak support edit 1. It still comes across as demanding to me... --Tewy 23:52, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Done- changed to Tewy's --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 04:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Where you at?
Taken from the Boost Mobile commercial. It leads to Misplaced Pages:Department directory, as it seems to fit, in my opinion. This could help newbies, or help a user find a particular place in Misplaced Pages. I guess. Any suggestions where else it can be linked to? Thanks! --Tohru Honda13 02:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Crude, and I can't think of anywhere better to link. --Tewy 18:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
When you're in Misplaced Pages, do as the Wikipedians do.
From "When you're in Rome, do as the Romans do." —sd31415 (sign here) 01:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: The traditional phrase is "When in Rome, do as the Romans do." SkierRMH 08:00, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support That is and excellent quote to use for your motto!!!--¿Why1991 19:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. What about "When you're in Misplaced Pages, do as the Wikipedians do.", or is that too demanding? --Tewy 05:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- That's another possibility. Let the voters decide between the two. —sd31415 (sign here) 22:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I think it should be like in the Roman one: When on Misplaced Pages, do as the Wikipedians do". | AndonicO 21:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
"In review"
I suppose this would be another bad idea Simply south 01:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Note: this is a motto suggestion so post new mottos above this one. Simply south 01:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Like you said. --Tewy 18:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- ? Simply south 13:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- (You supposed this would be another bad idea; and I agree, it's just not very interesting). --Tewy 19:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- ? Simply south 13:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- It could link to this page. Simply south 13:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Yeah... that makes no sense...--¿Why1991 19:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per Why1991. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- I was meaning that this could show that the motto for the day are under review, or people could vote so therefore "In review" <--It is now linked to this page. Simply south 13:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Freedom is the right to do anything that the law permits
- Montesquieu, French Political Philospher — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.32.116.44 (talk • contribs)
- Support LOL that's just great. Maybe "law" should link to wikiregulations or something. Idk where you would find that.--Goodface87
Edit with style.
Linked to WP:STYLE, I think this motto sends a message to editors to edit by the Manual of Style. What do you think? —sd31415 (sign here) 12:39, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Oh, the publicity. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
He who cannot agree with his enemies is controlled by them.
--May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 11:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose due to lack of context —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Any suggestions on how to improve it? --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 22:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I like where this is going, about trolls controlling people, but I'm not sure how to word it better. What about something completely different, along the lines of "Troll? What troll?". --Tewy 19:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Wiki would like to play.
Taken from Nintendo Wii; links to Misplaced Pages's introduction. —sd31415 (sign here) 22:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Good, except that Misplaced Pages neither hosts games nor plays them. --Tewy 03:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: How about replace "play" with "edit"? —sd31415 (sign here) 03:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Again, Misplaced Pages doesn't edit; users do. --Tewy 03:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- And the Wii doesn't play, the gamers do, but they still use that line. Joiz Shmo 04:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- "Misplaced Pages would like to edit." still sounds funny, almost like it's tired of all its wikipedians editing, and it wants to edit itself...or something. --Tewy 00:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I see what you mean. —sd31415 (sign here) 00:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- And the Wii doesn't play, the gamers do, but they still use that line. Joiz Shmo 04:31, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Again, Misplaced Pages doesn't edit; users do. --Tewy 03:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: How about replace "play" with "edit"? —sd31415 (sign here) 03:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: How about "Wiki would like you to play" or "Wiki would like you to edit"? SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:22, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Knowing is half the battle
"Knowing is half the battle." This quote, linked to Knowledge, is taken from GI Joe. —ScouterSig 21:30, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Think Different
This quote, linked to WP:NPOV, is taken from Apple Computer. —sd31415 (sign here) 20:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I like the quote, but think that it should point to something else (not sure what, but NPOV sits funny to me). —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
KA CHOW!!
This quote, linked to Misplaced Pages:Autoblock, is taken from the 2006 animated feature film produced by Pixar Animation Studios and distributed by Walt Disney Picture Cars. It compares the suddenness of the character saying this quote to the suddenness of an autoblock. —sd31415 (sign here) 15:07, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's pretty crude, and there's no way I would be able to extract that explanation from the motto itself. It makes Misplaced Pages sound like it enjoys blocking people. --Tewy 19:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose as potentially offensive. —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Knowledge is global, so share it.
Just rearanged the sentence I have on my Userpage. AxG (talk) 05:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Question. Just curious, is it an original quote, or did you find it from somewhere? --Tewy 19:57, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support While I too want to know where it came from, I think that it would make a great MOTD anyway. —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I found this from here on Misplaced Pages, although can not remember where. AxG (talk) 17:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Looks like it originated here, which links to a few places. --Tewy 19:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose I just don't think a motto should be motto of the day without links in it.--¿Why1991 19:07, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Why not? --Tewy 20:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Mottos need links only as much as advertisements need words. :-D ...hm...maybe I should nominate that... --Tewy 22:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- If you loooked in the archives, many of the older mottos didn't have links. In fact only recently have they become common. Tennis DyNamiTe 18:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- I agree; mottos can be great without links... (whispers)maybe even better... —ScouterSig 14:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Why not? --Tewy 20:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:19, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
When it Rains, it Pours
Well here is another lame idea :D. — Arjun 05:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- How about "When it rains, it pours."? --Tewy 05:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Well, you called it lame first. ;) —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Which version, or both? --Tewy 00:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Well, you called it lame first. ;) —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Shhh! We're sneaking up on the vandals. Got your guns?
How's it? All suggestions welcome. Yuser31415 04:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak support. Nice, but not the best. --Tewy 20:59, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Support. Okay quote. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
This quote, linked to Misplaced Pages:Talk page guidelines#Central points and Misplaced Pages:Edit war, is taken from John F. Kennedy's address to Latin American diplomats at the White House on March 12, 1962. sign here * HAPPY HOLIDAYS! -- s d 3 1 4 1 5 03:30, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support I believe that this would be a good quote for many Wikipedians to consider before arguing in a talk page or other related talk space. --¿Why1991 05:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. I get what it's saying, but it seems a little ominous. It seems to be saying that the only option besides peace is war, which isn't necessarily true. Also, what does a revolution have to do with edits/discussions on Misplaced Pages? --Tewy 20:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose for fear of WWIII beginning. —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
motto in development
I don't know how to word it, but I was thinking of something that has to do with n00bs, and veteran players alike pwning monsters in this MMORPG... maybe something about NPCs, weapons, etc. --Gray PorpoiseYour wish is my command! 03:19, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- If you can come up with anything out of this suggestion (you don't have to use all of them):
- MMORPG = Misplaced Pages or Misplaced Pages:WikiRPG
- players = Misplaced Pages:Wikipedians
- n00bs/newbs = Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers
- experienced players = Misplaced Pages:Administrators
- moderators = Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats
- pwnage or combat = Help:Reverting
- non-player characters = Misplaced Pages:Bots
- weapons = Misplaced Pages:Tools
- monsters = Misplaced Pages:Vandalism
- PKers = Misplaced Pages:What is a troll --Gray PorpoiseYour wish is my command! 03:59, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- So basically you're just trying to create a motto that encompasses multiple aspects of Misplaced Pages, based on these parallels? --Tewy 04:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Indeed so, primarily the aspect of vandal-fighting. --Gray PorpoiseYour wish is my command! 04:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support (the heading as a motto) Tennis DyNamiTe 21:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Vandals, Beware the RAVEN
This originated from a list of "WP:" pages and I realised that RAV and N were all to do with vandalism patrolling. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 01:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak support. I've never heard of "the RAVEN" before. It's just a made-up idea, so it has little significance besides providing links. --Tewy 21:02, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- What about: "Quoth the RAVEN, nevermore. It's still just a made up acronym, though. —ScouterSig 21:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- I was thinking about that poem. Maybe "Quoth the RAVEN" is good but what if "Nevermore" linked somewhere else? Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 09:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- I thought WP:tutorial was a good foil for all the other links, but it can go anywhere we want. —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- I was thinking about that poem. Maybe "Quoth the RAVEN" is good but what if "Nevermore" linked somewhere else? Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 09:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
I Can't Believe It's Not U. N. I. V. E. R. S. A. L.!
This quote is derived from I Can't Believe It's Not Butter. A variation could be I Can't Believe It's Not The U. N. I. V. E. R. S. E.! Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 01:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak support edit 1 only Like "the RAVEN", the original is just a random acronym. Edit 1 sounds better, but the links don't really correspond to what the motto says. --Tewy 21:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- oppose due to context stretching. —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Great, ___, great. Always thinkin' with your edit count.
From Han Solo's "Great, Chewie, great. Always thinkin' with your stomach" in Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi. (I don't know what to place in between the "great"'s.) sign here * HAPPY HOLIDAYS! -- s d 3 1 4 1 5 15:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: Perhaps "Great, Jimbo, great"? --70.177.117.132 23:01, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure that Jimbo doesn't always think with his edit count... --Tewy 20:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment This would make a wonderful April 1st motto if you could get the ____ to automatically fill in the user's name! Don't know if it's possible, but it would be a nice joke on everyone! SkierRMH 06:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- The user reading the motto or the user page it's on? 5 days to go...! User:Sp3000 07:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Probably the user page it's on (with {{FULLPAGENAME}}), in which case I weak support, because it's not as catchy as some other mottos, and doesn't apply to everyone. --Tewy 20:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- The user reading the motto or the user page it's on? 5 days to go...! User:Sp3000 07:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
E(rudition) = m(ultitude of users) * c(licks of the edit button)
Originally from Albert Einstein's famous equation, E=mc. sign here * HAPPY HOLIDAYS! -- s d 3 1 4 1 5 01:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I like where this is going, but how about changing "E(rudition)" to "E(xcellence)", a word more people are familiar with? --Tewy 20:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Edit 1 → E(xcellence) = m(ultitude of users) × c(licks of the edit button). —sd31415 (sign here) 20:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support edit 1. --Tewy 20:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Edit 1 → E(xcellence) = m(ultitude of users) × c(licks of the edit button). —sd31415 (sign here) 20:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Nothing not too obscure for Misplaced Pages.
It's funny, because it's grammatically correct in this context. --Gigacannon 04:50, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: please add new suggestions to the top of the list. Thank you. --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 09:57, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. That's grammatically correct? Shouldn't it be "Nothing isn't too obscure for Misplaced Pages."? --Tewy 20:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- How about, “Nothing: not to obscure for Misplaced Pages.” —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: just avoid double negatives, they're not correct grammar, in English at least. --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 16:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: Normally, 'Nothing not too obscure for wikipedia,' would be a double negative, meaning something along the lines of, 'Everything too obscure for wikipedia.' However in this case, nothing is not used as to mean an absence of things, but rather as a title of an article on the concept of nothingness. The motto is meant to read like an announcement, such as the header for an article in a magazine. However on reflection, I suppose, 'Nothing isn't too obscure for wikipedia,' might be better even if it loses a little punch. --Gigacannon 23:58, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
What part of wiki don't you understand?
— Arjun 17:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support This is sorta okay.--Tohru Honda13 18:19, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support, but how about changing "wiki" to a warning, e.g. "no vandalism", etc. Would that be slightly better? Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 01:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think a warning would create a negative message, and keeping positive seems better to me. --Tewy 20:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not terribly interesting. --Tewy 20:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I edit on here and i don't really understand what wiki is. Maybe someone who is very good with computers does. Simply south 02:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- This is an encyclopedia! Read the article! :-D. --Tewy 05:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
Calm down, its Misplaced Pages, I'm really a very good driver
Sorry for this, a take on the Esure adverts. However the "very good driver" should link to something. Not sure what.
Or maybe it could be reworded. The original known catchphrase is "Calm down dear, it's only a commercial. I'm really a very good driver", or "Calm down dear, its only a commercial".
Simply south 15:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- How about "Calm down, it's only Misplaced Pages"? Simply south 19:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Or how about "Calm down, it's only the world's largest online 💕?" Anthonycfc (talk * email * tools) 19:30, Tuesday December 26 2006 (UTC)
- I support that. --Tewy 20:37, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Damnit, Jim! I'm a Wikipedian, not a soothsayer.
Wiki-twist on the famous misquote of a Star Trek line. The name can be changed if desired. --Fsotrain 22:14, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment Well this idea has already been done but in reference to vandalism .Simply south 00:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment Kids come to wikipedia, I think the word Damn is too graphic for them. .somemoron
- Comment 2 Support: Though i'm a kid and I can read / hear that word all I want, I can't repeat it, and I wouldn't want other kids to. RyGuy Sign Here! My Journal 15:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: did you forget? Misplaced Pages is not cencored for minors. --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 22:51, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I actually was going to propose "Darn it" until I remembered that. --Fsotrain 23:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Been done before. --Tewy 23:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
Or Happy holidays! --Tewy 21:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support edit 1 (though it has come a bit late; I don't think it can get approved for Christmas) --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 22:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I figured it could work for next year. --Tewy 04:11, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm...how about Happy Holidays. — Seadog_MS 22:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Haha, I support that too. (Must stay politically correct!) --Tewy 04:12, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment If this gets approved, it will appear as the motto of the day sometime in February. Joiz Shmo 00:43, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strongly AgainstHappy Holidays is secularist! Laleena 18:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Many will enter, few will win.
Other possibilities:
- "Many will enter, few will win."
- "Many will enter, few will win." (Links here)
- Support any. --Gray Porpoise 23:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- The featured articles are referenced a lot in mottos, and many of the mottos suggested here become approved, so how about featured pictures (or featured lists or portals)? I've no idea. --Gray Porpoise 20:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- As I see it pictures would be the next largest thing, while mottos would promote this page. But anything works, really. Any other suggestions? --Tewy 22:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Why not all three? | AndonicO Talk 12:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- How would you consolidate them into a single motto? Or do you mean to have three seperate mottos with different links? --Tewy 00:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Why not all three? | AndonicO Talk 12:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- As I see it pictures would be the next largest thing, while mottos would promote this page. But anything works, really. Any other suggestions? --Tewy 22:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- The featured articles are referenced a lot in mottos, and many of the mottos suggested here become approved, so how about featured pictures (or featured lists or portals)? I've no idea. --Gray Porpoise 20:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support any. --Gray Porpoise 23:55, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Support I support the three versions. | AndonicO Talk 12:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Support edit 1 only. I prefer featured pictures, for some variety. --Tewy 01:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Tabled-Approved What will it say Geo. 01:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
----
TBH, we're desperate, few overseers are really active and this page is a mess: both get Rejected. Come back and try again if you must. --Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 17:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- (I'm coming back to try these two again, at least to reach a consensus). --Tewy 03:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
(Continued from archived discussion here) --Tewy 03:47, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- I support but here is an alternate-
Many will enter, few will win.
or Many will enter, few will win.
--¿Why1991 03:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- First of all, could you decide which version you like best? The reason I moved the two discussions from the archives was so that a consensus could be reached. Next, I oppose your first version, because adminship is not a trophy. I also weak oppose your second version, just because I wouldn't call being a wikipediholic "winning". Sorry. --Tewy 20:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Just the FAQs, ma'am
takeoff on Joe Friday's famous line. Spikebrennan 18:06, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak support. It's nice (better if linked to Misplaced Pages:FAQ), but doesn't really say much about Misplaced Pages. --Tewy 03:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
*Oppose, as I would rather have actual facts—ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- What about “Just the facts, ma'am” ? —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- I weak support that, because then the motto becomes the original quote with a random link that serves as the sole connection between the quote and Misplaced Pages. --Tewy 00:55, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- What about “Just the facts, ma'am” ? —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
W,I,K,I,P,E,D,I,A,
It's not done yet but I was thinking we could do an A is for Apple kind of thing for the word "Misplaced Pages"
W= wonderous
I= Informative
K=
I=
P=
E= excellent
D=
I=
A= awesome/awe-inspiring
—¡Randfan! 00:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Please add new mottos to the top of the list. Thanks. --Tewy 01:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Good idea to expand on. How about "Misplaced Pages is...A Wiki, In progress,
KompletelyBecoming error-free, Indifferent, Public, Editor-friendly, Dynamic, Interesting, and Addicting." My other ideas were "Evolving" and "All of the above". "Public" could also link to Misplaced Pages:Copyrights. Any other suggestions? --Tewy 02:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC) - For the Is, I was thinking "informative" and "innovative". --Gray PorpoiseYour wish is my command! 00:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: How about Portals for P, and Disambiguations for D? --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 12:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- That's another option. But then you'd have to change the other letters to keep it consistent. Right now they describe what Misplaced Pages is, not what makes it up. So if you or anyone else can think of some more things that are part of Misplaced Pages, that could work (Wikipedians, Articles, etc.) --Tewy 18:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: How about a sentence spelt out that sums up Misplaced Pages with the letters? Simply south 18:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Like "Wikipedia, in keeping its positive editors dynamic, is advancing"? --Tewy 19:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Moved from the previous page at user request. --Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- From Misplaced Pages:Glossary: "Wikipedians, Images, Kate's Tool, Infoboxes, Portals, Edits, Disambiguation pages, Internal links, Articles."
- Feel free to revise it as needed (just say what you're doing!). --Tewy 00:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment How is Misplaced Pages a "Kate's Tool"? Tennis DyNamiTe 01:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Edit counters make up Misplaced Pages (sort of), but also Kate's Tool is the only word in Misplaced Pages:Glossary that starts with a "k". I've removed the "a" just before "Wiki" to clarify better, as well as changed "Wiki" to "Wikipedians", and "Editors" to "Edits". --Tewy 04:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. I think this acrostic would be entirely too long. —ScouterSig 16:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Decisions to be acted on
Hello, Goodbye
It may seem a little strange but I think it shows how quickly time flies/vandalism is reverted, etc. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 04:30, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Boring. --Tewy 04:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I can't think of how to put my motto but that is my idea- is the idea at least OK? Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 04:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's just not very catchy. For something this short, it should rhyme or something, because this just seems like (no offense) a quickly thought-up motto. --Tewy 05:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- I get your point but the only phrase that's the same length, has the same meaning AND rhymes is "Hi, Bye" which, in my opinion, is worse. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 05:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, I didn't mean for that either, but I can't think of a better version. Maybe you just need a new idea altogether. --Tewy 05:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- I get your point but the only phrase that's the same length, has the same meaning AND rhymes is "Hi, Bye" which, in my opinion, is worse. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 05:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's just not very catchy. For something this short, it should rhyme or something, because this just seems like (no offense) a quickly thought-up motto. --Tewy 05:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I can't think of how to put my motto but that is my idea- is the idea at least OK? Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 04:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose yeah it is a little lame, It doesn't exactly make sense to me. — Arjun 04:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose as too harsh. —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak support. It's an okay motto. When I saw it, I thought it motto-ized the Beatles song Hello, Goodbye. Wodup 00:35, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Rejected per consensus. Wodup 09:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
This user vandalised Misplaced Pages is Willy ON WHEELS!
I'm not sure whether anything like this has been nominated before or whether this is alright but upon seeing #REDIRECT Misplaced Pages ON WHEELS! I thought this might be a bit of a laugh. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 03:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Similar versions have already been used. --Tewy 04:00, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- That was what I was unsure of. Thanks! Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 04:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tewy. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 18:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Rejected per consensus. Wodup 09:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Gotta catch 'em all!
This quote, linked to WP:SOCK, is taken from the original Pokemon series. An alternative is Gotta catch 'em all! (edit 1), which links to WP:VAND. sign here * HAPPY HOLIDAYS! -- s d 3 1 4 1 5 02:23, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support- that made me LOL literally! Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 02:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: Thanks! Oh, and do you support the original or edit 1? sign here * HAPPY HOLIDAYS! -- s d 3 1 4 1 5 02:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- I support WP:VAND slightly more. However, either is fine. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 02:32, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support either one Hilarious! --Tohru Honda13 02:31, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support the original. — Arjun 02:34, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support original only. There are enough vandalism mottos right now. --Tewy 03:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support Original That tis' be very funny, especially if you like Pokemon. --¿Why1991 05:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Support I was actually going to nominate this, but I forgot...Tennis DyNamiTe 13:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support the Vandal one more so than sockpuppets; though how many mottos link to sockpuppets? —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support either --May the Edit be with you, always. T-borg 16:50, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support-Good and funny TeckWizContribs@ 20:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Approved due to Unanimous Consensus. FTC; Geo. 21:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedian tested, doctor approved.
I saw this in a commercial. Kid tested, mother approved, or something like that. How is it? --Tohru Honda13 01:28, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Quite funny so support. Simply south 01:32, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support suggestion 2. WODUP 04:46, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support Great one that will be a classic before you know it!! --¿Why1991 03:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support- It's funny and witty. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 01:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --Tewy 20:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support Very witty. South Wales 00:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 23:00, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Approved per consensus. Wodup 09:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Can you feel the love?
Inspired by holiday cheer. WODUP (talk * contribs * count * logs * email) 00:59, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not catchy. --Tewy 20:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Rejected. Only an oppose. Wodup 09:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Wikiing the way to a smarter tomorrow.
Link or not to wiki. WODUP | talk 00:59, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Rejected. No votes, and I withdraw the nomination. Wodup 09:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Just do it.
Nike tagline. WODUP 00:59, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support I like it a lot. --Tohru Honda13 06:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Short and to the point. --Tewy 20:19, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong support —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Very nice. SD31415 (SIGN HERE) 12:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Approved per consensus. Wodup 09:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
So easy, a caveman can do it!
The cavemen from the Geico commercials! Oh, if there are any cavemen here, no offense. ;-)Seriously, I hope this doesn't offend anyone. Tohru Honda13 07:11, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support, good but not great. — Arjun 16:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak support. It's true, but I think it lacks a certain finesse. --Tewy 18:58, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Support Like stated above it's okay. --¿Why1991 03:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose as I don't want to be identified as a caveman; new editors probably don't, either. —ScouterSig 16:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support I love those commercials, so I have to suport it. DannyQuack 21:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per Scouter, and because I hate those ads. -- Kicking222 22:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- support per Dannyquack. These commercials are awesome. And besides, it's true. And it's not insulting to us it's insulting to cavemen. Gosh! 12.74.209.206 23:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- YSupport I like the commercials. Reywas92Sigs 21:35, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Approved per consensus. Wodup 09:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
It's 5 o'clock somewhere, but only twice a day in UTC.
WODUP 06:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Technically, Misplaced Pages uses a 24-hour clock, so it's 5 o'clock once a day in UTC. --Tewy 03:37, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Doesn't really say much about Misplaced Pages. --Tewy 05:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. —sd31415 (sign here) 14:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose as it's only 05:00 only once, and 17:00 only once. SkierRMH 05:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Rejected per consensus. Wodup 09:21, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Category: