| Revision as of 05:04, 29 January 2007 editAaron Brenneman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,683 edits Deletion← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:35, 12 February 2007 edit undoKizor (talk | contribs)Administrators13,645 edits ←Created page with '==WCCA DRV== Ssh! Pass it on! --~~~~'Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==WCCA DRV== | |||
| {{webcomicsproj|class=Start|importance=Top}} | |||
| ] --] 00:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notability== | |||
| I wanted to point this out: any comic that has won an award from the WCCA is considered notable as per the current version of ] (this is unlikely to change). So every comic here should have an article on Wiki. ] 08:00, 10 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :I agree, which is why I have been trying to list all of the recipients. ] ] 16:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I think the awards for 2005 are wrong. The page seems to state the presentators rather than the winners. e.g. A lesson is learned but the damage is irreversible took home the award for outstanding layout. http://www.ccawards.com/2005ceremony/layout.htm I'm too new to this to dare edit the page... The nominees and the winners are presented at http://www.ccawards.com/2005.htm {{unsigned|85.235.0.157|06:56, May 9, 2006}} | |||
| Duh. my mistake, I now clearly see that this page (the wikipedia page)only says who presented the awards. still, it could use the updating, maybe I'll just learn how this html stuff works and do it myself, but please, someone, beat me too it. {{unsigned|85.235.0.157|00:10, May 10, 2006}} | |||
| ==Notable== | |||
| How are the Web Cartoonist's Choice Awards notable? --] 17:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :As for third party reputable sources, it has been featured on G4 techTV's Atack of the Show in August, 2005 and also in a New York Times article on digital comics 17 August, 2005. ] 11:07, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Not according to the article as it exists now. We've got some tail-swallowing here: The web content guideline says that an award must be notable, so unless some meat is added to this article, quite a few of these comics which have ''no other'' claim to satisfying the critera look vulnerable. - ] 23:01, 17 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Controversy Section == | |||
| This section was blanked and brought back recently. I didn't remove it, but I am of the opinion that the article might be better off without it... It seems like NPOV and OR concerns seems concentrated in this section. Can we do without it? -- ] (]) 06:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I added some {{tl|fact}} tags to it. If we can't source it, then the section should be edited accordingly. ] ] 06:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::I just cut quite a bit of unsourced controversy, arguments, etc. -- ] 06:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :I was one of the people to remove unsourced segments - if we can find some reputable sources for the controversy, then we can bring them back, but good luck trying to find an internal webcomic debate outside of the forums and blogs. The controversy exists, but it's entirely online, making a rather unfortunate barrier. <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 06:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
| == Deletion == | |||
| Per ] this page is to be deleted. However my recalcitrant broswer means that it's now in {{]}} status for the time being. - <font color="black">]</font> 05:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC) | |||