| Revision as of 16:21, 2 March 2022 editKk1141014036 (talk | contribs)9 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:47, 2 March 2022 edit undoKk1141014036 (talk | contribs)9 edits →Factual information: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| Historical sources to support the kshatriya tag given..the status of Poundta as kshatriya continue till today ] (]) 16:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC) | Historical sources to support the kshatriya tag given..the status of Poundta as kshatriya continue till today ] (]) 16:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == Factual information == | |||
| Maurya community which is known to be the ancestors of Mauryan dynasty are currently under Backward classes...many kshatriya too have reservation and quata benefits which doesn't qualify them to be called as Dalits.. ] (]) 16:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:47, 2 March 2022
 | India: West Bengal Stub‑class  | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Barman (2014)
In the pre-colonial literatures (such as Brihatdharma Purana, Brahmabaibartya Purana, Sibayan of Rameswar Bhattacharya and Annadamangal of Bharat Chandra Ray) the Poundras were classified as almost untouchable (as antaja, asatsudra, adhamsankara, etc).
— Barman, Rup Kumar (2014-01-01). "From Pods to Poundra: A Study on the Poundra Kshatriya Movement for Social Justice 1891–1956". Voice of Dalit. 7 (1): 121–138. doi:10.1177/0974354520140108. ISSN 0974-3545.
So many issues in a single line:
- Asatsudra did not mean
almost untouchable
in Brh. P — such an assumption would span over half of the Uttam Sankaras alongside all of Madhyam Sankaras and Adham Sankaras. In any case, Poundras/Pods are not mentioned in Brh. P. and Barman does not provide any source either. - About Bv. P., see my addition to the article.
- More later incl. other parts of article.
TrangaBellam (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Offensive terms banned by high courts of India..
Use of the word "dalit" is discouraged and banned by high courts of India..please remove it.. Kk1141014036 (talk) 15:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Decision by Bombay High court 2018 banning the use of word dalit Kk1141014036 (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- Indian courts don't have jurisdiction over Misplaced Pages, which is hosted in the United States, and Misplaced Pages is not censored. JBW (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Kshatriya reservation ...
Many kshatriya castes have reservation benefits like Yadav's Jats Marathas etc come under OBC and many others have ST like Kurmi ..or Meena who also are known to be kshatriya..some kushwaha caste come under EBC too.
Poundra were recognised as kshatriya by government of West Bengal during 1950 and are mentioned as kshatriya in government records so officially they are kshatriya... Kk1141014036 (talk) 15:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
On 14 December 1939, Patiram Roy MLA placed the demand before the Bengal Legislative Assembly for identifying the community as Paundra-Kshatria, and the proposal was carried in the Assembly. Earlier on 6 May 1938, the secretary of the Bengal government in a letter appraised Patiram Roy that the community would be designated as 'Paundra-Kshatria' in the official documents and in proceedings of the court. Kk1141014036 (talk) 16:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Historical sources to support the kshatriya tag given..the status of Poundta as kshatriya continue till today Kk1141014036 (talk) 16:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Factual information
Maurya community which is known to be the ancestors of Mauryan dynasty are currently under Backward classes...many kshatriya too have reservation and quata benefits which doesn't qualify them to be called as Dalits.. Kk1141014036 (talk) 16:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Categories: