Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:59, 9 March 2022

Vandalism

Please Check this guy: 2A02:587:221C:2C00:1DB4:DD7C:C0F0:49E8 I was checking the other Battles as well. He changed the results of the First Battle of Inonu, Second Battle of Inonu and Battle of Sakarya to inconclusive on the very same day in June. Please check those edits. For Battle of Sakarya, people kept changing it back to original even though he tried changing the result. On the other hand on Battle of First Inonu and Battle of Second Inonu pages, no one reverted it back. Therefore, I deleted his/her edit because he attempted changing the results of other two battles as well. Please limit these pages to prevent further Vandalism. Also the user: Fjhd(https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Fjhd), can you check his history as well, he is also the one who changed the results all the time. You can see only thing he did was changing the results of battles for no reason at all on the same day. He changed the Battle of Gediz to Greek victoru even though Greek army retreated and Turkish army captured Gediz. Orignally it was considered as inconclusive until he vandalized the page. He also changed the results of Battle of Sakarya, First Inonu and Second Inonu. Please be more considerate. People always kept changing the results back to the Original. Also, if you read the whole articles everything is explained in detail yet these guys made no contribution to these articles but only thing they did is changing the results, with no explanation or no description in the article. They did not add anything to article to explain the change in results. Only thing they did is changing one word in all of the articles by using the same source without even using that source to explain anything in the articles. If you want I can add a couple of more sources to prove my point but before these guys changed the results randomly, these articles were already informative and consistent with the reults but now they dont make any sense at all.

Welcome

Hello Egsan Bacon and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I'm glad you've chosen to join us. This is a great project with lots of dedicated people, which might seem intimidating at times, but don't let anything discourage you. Be bold!, explore, and contribute. If you want to learn more,

Misplaced Pages:Bootcamp teaches you the basics quickly,
Misplaced Pages:Tutorial is more in-depth, and
Misplaced Pages:Topical index is exhaustive.

The following links might also come in handy:
Glossary
FAQ
Help
Manual of Style
Five Pillars of Misplaced Pages

Float around for awhile until you find something that tickles your fancy. One easy way to do this is to hit the random page button in the navigation bar to the left. There are also many great committees and groups that focus on particular jobs. My personal favorite stomping grounds are Misplaced Pages:Translation into English and Misplaced Pages:Cleanup for sloppy articles. Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has several other wiki projects that you might enjoy.

There are a few crucial points to keep in mind when editing. Be civil with users, strive to maintain a neutral point of view, verify your information, and show good etiquette like signing your comments with four tildas like this: ~~~~ If you have any more questions, always feel free to ask me anything on my talk page or ask the true experts at Misplaced Pages:Help desk. Again, welcome! -- Draeco 07:29, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

speedy

For crap like Fattymoo, you just slap {{db|nonsense}} on the article - you don't bother with AfD. -- RHaworth 06:01, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Join WikiProject Koei Warriors Games!

Would you like to join the Koei Warriors Games WikiProject? It is everything Dynasty Warriors, Samurai Warriors, and Warriors Orochi! To participate, add your name to the list of participants and apply {{User WPKoeiWarriors}} to your user page.

If you are not sure what a WikiProject is, it is a club of Wikipedians interested in the WikiProject's subject and helping to improve articles of or related to that subject. I saw you greatly contributed to the Samurai Warriors article, so I figured I'd ask if you wanted to participate in Misplaced Pages:Wikiproject/Koei Warriors Games. You do not have to, and neither are you obliged; I am just asking. -BlueCaper (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Your approach to contributing

Looking at your edit history, you seem to spend an awful lot of time removing stuff, and almost zero time adding content. I find that... unfortunate. Not to insult either, but it does seem to be an attitude that gets Misplaced Pages a fair amount of grief when Misplaced Pages in general is discussed on other sites. Positive public perception is good, right? You particularly seem to have something against xkcd. I can see the argument of xkcd strips being below a relevancy threshold, but at the same time, it seems like overkill to be pursuing these references. I personally don't bother with removing stuff. I feel it's at least as useful to simply add the occasional referenced details, or fix links. (And in specific reference to an xkcd link of mine that you removed, you did a sloppy job by removing the References section too.) Sorry for preaching. ~Gertlex (talk) 05:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages can be improved by removing content added by idiots like you. Fancy that. 90.219.166.246 (talk) 19:08, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Dear god but this page is full of faggotry coming from every side. Honestly, on the one hand, he have a contributor who acts and speaks like he's a member of the fucking Cosa Nostra, e.g "I find that... unfortunate." I was expecting to see that followed up with something about protection money and made men. Now, on the other hand, we have a random idiot coming in and doing the wikipedia equivalent of thread necromancy, and his(Females shouldn't be insulted by this, as he's a fucking idiot.) head is so vacuous and empty that he can't even bother to state how wikipedia will be improved or even why Signor Mafioso is and idiot(He is, but that's beside the point.)

ITP: The Cancer that is Killing Misplaced Pages

Fuck you all.

--209.101.39.194 (talk) 16:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

I was the one who finally killed the worthless In Popular Culture section of the Jimmy Carter Swimming Rabbit Incident page in Dec 2009, and I wanted to thank you for helping to keep that page XKCD-free. You made that edit a year ago, which I only noticed now because I forgot to check if my edit had stood, but I am glad there are people staying vigilant for XKCD vandalism. 108.28.44.31 (talk) 16:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm just wondering why you would categorize XKCD as vandalism. In many cases, Randall Munroe's cultural references bring light upon subjects that readers may not have otherwise known. It's prejudicial to remove something simply because it comes from XKCD; why don't you try -- I dunno -- looking at the context in which the reference was included? Just a thought. (p.s. I have a rather low opinion of people who judge and criticize others, but yet will only sign with an IP number, and not a username.) --Magmagirl (talk) 17:54, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	For Crime scene getaway. Bearian (talk) 22:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Adaptation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brook

Fauna of West Virginia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brook

Four-eyed turtle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brook

Makupa Circus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Church

The Gorzen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Brook

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wilmer Flores, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grand slam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Comment how on history

How do you comment on the View History?

Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 01:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Enjoy

Gregkaye ✍♪ 05:34, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

RM notification

Since you have participated in at least one Requested Move or Move Review discussion, either as participant or closer, regarding the title of the article currently at Sarah Jane Brown, you are being notified that there is another discussion about that going on now, at Talk:Sarah Jane Brown#Requested move #10. We hope we can finally achieve consensus among all participating about which title best meets policy and guidelines, and is not too objectionable. --В²C ☎ 17:13, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation contest.

Hey, look - you had better fix some more links for the contest, because I have already won a t-shirt for coming in the top three, and I would feel awkward winning another one so soon. Try to top a thousand. If it helps, here's the list of pages with the most bonus links. Cheers! bd2412 T 23:29, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

New York Mets

I apologize for my edit to New York Mets. Those retired numbers I added are numbers I feel should be retired by the Mets. Once again, I'm sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CelticsFan76 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Sine nomine

added a link pointing to Anonymous

The Third Part of the Pilgrim's Progress

added a link pointing to Anonymous

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Move Review

There is currently a discussion at WP:MR to which you may be associated with. The thread can be found here. Thanks. -- Calidum 03:55, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Cat and the Canary (1939 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Beal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Free t-shirt for placing in the February 2015 disambiguation contest

Congratulations! For placing in the February 2015 disambiguation contest, you will receive a free t-shirt from the Wikimedia Foundation. Message me if you need me to send the details for claiming your prize. Cheers! bd2412 T 16:49, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Dauvray Cup

On 9 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dauvray Cup, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the first baseball World Series trophy, the Dauvray Cup, was funded by stage actress Helen Dauvray? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dauvray Cup. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:01, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Request

Can I request that, if you want to take issue with an editor's behaviour that, as well as pinging other editors, that you also either directly contact or ping the editor concerned. Notification had to be provided by another editor. GregKaye 09:25, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

I'm assuming this is in reference to Misplaced Pages talk:Requested moves#Request to revert a whole bunch of undiscussed moves? Firstly, I must take objection to the statement that I "ping other editors". I made three pings in that conversation, two of which were to you, and the third was in the most recent of the five comments I made, well after you joined the conversation. Secondly, I was not attempting to start a discussion of anyone's behaviour, I was attempting to place a request to revert undiscussed moves. The main RM page has a space, under the subheading "Requesting technical moves" for "Requests to revert undiscussed moves". Had there only been a few moves in question, I would have filled out the appropriate template and listed them there, and an admin would have moved them, or not moved them and converted them to RM discussions. Either way would not involve pinging anyone or a discussion of anyone's behavior. I left a note on the talk page instead because filling out the same template one at a time for hundreds of articles would have been an incredibly tedious undertaking, and I was hoping that admins had access to an automated process that could do the reverts much more easily if they agreed my request had merit. Egsan Bacon (talk) 16:32, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

I note, even following a request regarding pinging, that you don't ping with your reply. that you raised is exactly as I described and it was only after I had been made aware of the content that you started pinging me. Your selective pings have appeared in threads found here. here and here.. This after you made no contact with me when raising complaint.

I repeat:

"Can I request that, if you want to take issue with an editor's behaviour that, as well as pinging other editors, that you also either directly contact or ping the editor concerned." Is this unfair?

In my recent extension of the first thread I have raised other issues with, what I contested to be, your misrepresentations here, none of which you have replied to.

You have fairly called me to account in regard to some of my earlier behaviours and your corrections have been appreciated. You present "undiscussed moves" when almost all the moves made had made reference to that first supportive discussion (as the immediately following editor also pointed out), you say that I am starting a fourth discussion when what I was doing was continuing the first of the three discussions that I had started, when you present "that this is simply a religious issue and nothing more" when there are clearly a very wide range of cultural connections to the divinities mentioned. Your arguments include, relating to figures in religion "This isn't a religious issue". Do you say that it purely mythological? (I would like to propose a great many tons of masonry and countless artefacts as evidence to say that it is not). Is this really what you are saying? If so then please substantiate. I have previously left you the above. A motivation behind the issues raised here is that I would genuinely like you to come sunny side up. GregKaye 13:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Hey :) My name is chocolate (talk) 20:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Change on Lammermuir Party Link

Hi Egsan. Recently you made a change for Mary Bell on the page the Lammermuir Party. Your text stated it was the wrong link. This link for Mary Bell should link to the page William David Rudland. I'm confused about the change. Please explain. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NRud320 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello. The link I removed at Lammermuir Party was a link to the article Mary Bell. That article is not a link to an article about a Mary Bell who was a missionary in the 1860s, but about a Mary Bell who was a murderer in the 1960s. Since the link Mary Bell leads to the murderer by that name, but the context of the link clearly does not intend the link to go to the murderer by that name, it was a link to the wrong Mary Bell. As the link could only serve to confuse, by bringing the reader to a link about an entirely different person who happens to have the same name, I removed it. Since the other Mary Bells listed at the disambiguation page, Mary A. Bell, Mary Hayley Bell, and Mary Bell (aviator), are also not the person this link was meant for, none of them having yet been born in the 1860s, I did not replace the link with a link to the article on this Mary Bell, as there does not appear to be one at this time. If you believe there should be a link to the article on her husband, by all means, you are free to make such a link. Egsan Bacon (talk) 16:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Pertinax

Hi Egsan! Sorry but my English is not so good :-) I'm normally writing on Wiki.it. I've put that text that you've deleted:

• Schillinger 00171 = IDRE-01, 00197 = IKoeln 00274 = AE 1963, 00052 = AE 1964, +00224 = AE 1988, 00894 (Provincia: Germania inferior, Place: Bruhl): Helvaci / q(uo) p(ublico) p coh(ortis) IIII(?) G]al/or(um) ect(ricis) / raeaef(ecto) / lae ro/curant(a) / raeoc(uratori) / ug(usti) ad(em) / M / Agrs /
• That was the meaning of his cursus honorum:
  • "Publius Helvius Pertinax was equus publicus,
  • praefectus cohortis IV Gallorum equitatae (in Syria during the Roman–Parthian War of 161–166) --> period 160-165 AD,
  • then tribunus militum legio VI Victrix (in Britannia), then praefectus cohors I Tungrorum (again in Britain) --> period 165-167 AD;
  • then praefectus alae (in Moesia, see Historia Augusta Pertinax 2, 1), --> period 167-168;
  • then procurator ad alimenta (see Historia Augusta Pertinax 2, 2) period --> 168-169 AD,
  • then praefectus classis Germanicae at Colonia Claudia Ara Agrippinensis, (see Historia Augusta Pertinax 2, 2-3) period --> half/late 169 AD
  • then he would have been procurator Augusti ducenarius (= he gain 200.000 sextertii a year) of the province of III Daciarum together with Moesia Superior]. Best regards. --Cristiano64 (talk) 21:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations!

You beat me to 3rd! Congratulations on the busy disambiguation on New Year's Eve; it's a pleasure sparring with you!Klbrain (talk) 00:07, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Hope you have a good New Year's. Egsan Bacon (talk) 00:53, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

St Georges School, Carlton

Hi, Not quite sure why the link fix was made as the item in question wasn't a link in the first place but part of the reference citation as supplied by the National Library of Australia for Misplaced Pages entries. Happy to leave it now, but I wouldn't count it towards any score. Henry Sowerberry (talk) 06:03, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

The part that was changed wasn't the visible part of the citation ("Punch (Melbourne, Vic. : 1900 - 1918; 1925)"), it was the place it was linked to, which was Punch. If someone clicked on that link looking for more information about the periodical being cited, they would get a page that provided articles about many different things called "Punch" or "punch". Since the one they want is located at the link Melbourne Punch, they would need to search through that list and hopefully not get confused for one of the other periodicals with that name. With the link fixed, they don't have to do that, because now clicking on it brings them right to the article about the specific "Punch" they wanted information on. Egsan Bacon (talk) 16:36, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

editing

Thank you, i was trying to figure out the editing process, the sandbox is very useful Rylerfrench25 (talk) 19:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

You're welcome. Egsan Bacon (talk) 20:38, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Level 8 Magician

With the vague definition of "mechanic" given, I felt it was necessary to bring awareness to the lack of description of the trade. Simply listing different forms of a trade does not define the magic being performed. Mechanics in power plants turn rocks and dead dinosaurs into lightning bolts. How's that for magic?? Plus, the picture on the page depicts a mechanic working on a steam pump, which is inaccurate. There are no steam pumps in a power plant, as steam cannot be pumped. "Steam pumps" are pumps powered by steam, such as a steam locomotive engine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.173.39.51 (talk) 10:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Kylie RM

Good evening. You are invited to participate in the move discussion on Talk:Kylie, because you previously commented in a previous RM on the same subject. Thank you, Calidum ¤ 03:35, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Egsan Bacon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RfC Notice

There is a Request for Comment posted at Talk:New York Daily News#Request for Comment. You are being notified as a registered editor who has commented on that article's talk page or in a related move review. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:49, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Noblesville High School

Hello,

I am (Redacted), and I am here with (Redacted). We are two students that attend Noblesville High School. We are sorry if the information we put in our heading offend you, or some rules. However we noticed in the wiki page referring to Noblesville Indiana just stated facts about our home, and nothing about the culture it represents. "We are together!" Is a popular saying among the people of Noblesville representing how we are all a family. We appreciate you trying to keep Misplaced Pages clean of bad information but we were/ are trying to represent our city, and home in a more positive light.

Sincerely, (Redacted), (Redacted) Dudemanyeeyew (talk) 15:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

I have attempted to explain the situation to this user at their talk page. Alsee (talk) 16:48, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

President Grant

Looks good.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 17:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. Egsan Bacon (talk) 19:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

You've been reverted and I didn't get a response from the person who did it. After watching the season premiere of Scandal, I got concerned and I checked the article to make sure your hatnote was still there. It had been gone for some time as I took the longest time to go through the history. Since the article is featured, I'm guessing all those edits were intended to get it to featured status (Wrong. I figured out how to see when it was promoted. How in the world does an article that is already featured get that many edits?). A discussion is needed but one of the participants doesn'ty indicate he/she is interested.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:43, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Egsan Bacon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Claire Eccles) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Claire Eccles, Egsan Bacon!

Misplaced Pages editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for the excellent article on Claire Eccles. Your contribution is greatly appreciated.

To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptropic (talk) 16:28, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Belated best wishes for a happy 2018

== BoringHistoryGuy (talk) 14:54, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks! Egsan Bacon (talk) 16:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Claire Eccles

On 17 January 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Claire Eccles, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in 2017, Canadian pitcher Claire Eccles became the first woman to play baseball in the collegiate West Coast League? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Claire Eccles. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Claire Eccles), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Your opinion

Hi. Based on your recent comments on Talk:Elizabeth I of England, I thought that you might be interested in this discussion. I'll be glad if you share your opinions. Keivan.f 18:47, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for FESTIMA

On 24 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article FESTIMA, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the organizers of FESTIMA, a festival in Burkina Faso celebrating traditional African masks, estimate that 100,000 people attended in 2016? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/FESTIMA. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, FESTIMA), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Egsan Bacon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Government of Alameda County, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Caste system among South Asian Christians

Hi Egsan Bacon. Based on the ongoing discussion at the talk page of that article, could you consider undoing your close of the move discussion so that it can be discussed further? Thanks! --RegentsPark (comment) 13:14, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

• Not a problem. I have done so. Egsan Bacon (talk) 14:03, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at American Indian Wars shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Donald Albury 20:51, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Congratulations on being in the top 3 most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Great job. –Novem Linguae (talk) 07:49, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

You removed reliably sourced information

https://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Turkish_War_of_Independence

If you take two minutes, you can see that 2 3 editors are running a campaign on purpose. this is a complete blind loop. We cannot enter data because they have blocked us. you say "you can go and contribute". but they do not allow it. review the history of the page. they reject and delete resources. but they cite an interview done a week ago as a source. I am not threatening. just stop these malicious people. You can see that they are just making propaganda by reading the page history.

In a sub-title, almost all sources are Armenian. In addition, there are writers who have Armenian chairs in other sources. Example : https://en.wikipedia.org/Turkish_War_of_Independence#Ethnic_cleansing

97 Kevorkian Armenian 98 Kevorkian Armenian 99 Kevorkian Armenian 100 Kevorkian Armenian 101 Kevorkian Armenian 61 Avedian Armenian

example of denial of resources : 22:15, 8 May 2021‎ Buidhe talk contribs‎ 106,390 bytes −821‎ →‎top: these are just reviews repeating mc carthy's claims, and have no independent value (except for the reception of his book)

This is a Turkish phobia. When you read this editor's other posts and see him reject sources, you will see that he is neutral and has created a campaign.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.245.194.181 (talk) 22:20, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Well, IP 88, I can't ping you, and you can't watchlist pages, so you probably won't see this, but: 1) You really need to stop accusing other editors of things like "There are 2 editors who use Misplaced Pages for their own propaganda purposes." and you can see that 2 3 editors are running a campaign on purpose. Without evidence, those are personal attacks. You need to provide evidence, with diffs, explaining how those editors are doing that. It's not incumbent on anyone else to take two minutes to find your evidence for you. (Please note that I do not mean you should do that on this page. You should not. Please do not. I'm not an admin, so I couldn't do anything about it even if I found your evidence undeniable.) 2) You really need better reasons for why you have problems with specific sources than because they're Armenian. Egsan Bacon (talk) 04:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, Egsan Bacon, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you now intend to create more articles about women drawing on the French and Italian wikis. It's good to have such an active contributor devoting more editing time to our cause. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Primer for creating women's biographies. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I moved your competition entry above my list. For reasons I could not work out it appeared halfway through my list. Thanks. Roundtheworld (talk) 18:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205 Online events: New: July Julies | Finance, economics & banking | Olympic & Paralympic Games New contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: "Mind your elders" Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Stefanina Moro

On 24 June 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stefanina Moro, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Genoa honored Stefanina Moro, a teenage courier in the Italian resistance who was killed by Nazis, by naming a street after her? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stefanina Moro. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stefanina Moro), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

List of right-wing terrorist attacks

I wonder if you can add an inline citation for the Capitol storming entry in List of right-wing terrorist attacks? Anonymous user 85.255.237.12 apparently thinks my addition of {{citation needed}} was "Trumpist bulls--t", even though I actually despise him. I wanted inline citations to solidify the motive (Trumpism), but I have been avoiding the news entirely due to my poor mental health. --Minoa (talk) 23:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

@Minoa:, I added a source from The Guardian. It would be pretty easy to bombard that with a whole cascade of links, but I figured one should be sufficient to stop further attempts at unexplained removal. Egsan Bacon (talk) 02:33, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks: that should do fine for now. If the unexplained/unconstructive removals continue, we may have to look at some kind of patrol. --Minoa (talk) 08:36, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

a barnstar for you!

	Women in Red Women in Europe contest
	Egsan Bacon Thank you for your additions June 2021 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:35, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Austregilde

On 9 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Austregilde, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, after her death, a contemporary of Frankish queen Austregilde both called her "the light of her homeland, the world, and the court" and compared her to Herod? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Austregilde. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Austregilde), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons at Women in Red

Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207 Online events: New: Indigenous women | Women's leadership & empowerment Contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Olympic & Paralympic Games | Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208 Online events: New: Women writers & their works Contest (Jul/Aug/Sep): Latin America contest Continuing: Women's leadership & empowerment | Olympic & Paralympic Games Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Interwiki Women Collaboration Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Learn more about our proposed one-day online recruitment initiative in October. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

October 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211 Online events: New: Women in STEM New Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman Special event: 12 October: Ada Lovelace Day 24-Hour Global Edit-a-thon See also: Women in Green Good Article Edit-a-thon Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213 Online events: New: Film + Stage | Endocrine health Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Misplaced Pages Asian Month 2021 Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 at Women in Red

Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216 Online events: New: "Double the lede!" | Women who died in 2021 Contest (Oct/Nov/Dec): Women in Oceania contest Continuing: Women's rights | #1day1woman See also: Women in Climate Change and preparations for our 2022 Climate initiative Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help plan and coordinate future events. Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Follow Women in Red on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

January 2022 Women in Red

Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219 Online events: New: Climate (year-long initiative) | Women in business | US territories Continuing: #1day1woman | Women who died in 2021 Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month. Go to Women in RedJoin WikiProject Women in Red Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

You need to stop

You're clearly uneducated. You'd do everyone a favor if you just went away. 174.247.240.161 (talk) 00:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Seditious conspiracy

The grammar of the passage that you edited was correct as written. The Oath Keepers are accused of planning to oppose the certification of results. Which results? The Electoral College results. How did they oppose the certification? In the Capitol attack. 67.180.143.89 (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

February with Women in Red

Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222 Online events: New: Black women | Hong Kong and Macau | Women in sport Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

tottenham get battered

everywhere they go

tottenham get battered

everywhere they go

everywhere they gooooooooo — Preceding unsigned comment added by BIG CRAIG DAWSON (talk • contribs) 21:46, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

March editathons

Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225 Online events: New: Women's History Month Art+Activism | Feminism and Folklore | Dutch Caribbean Continuing: Climate (year-long initiative) | #1day1woman | Women in sport (Feb/Mar) Other ways to participate: Encourage someone to become a WiR member this month by registering in the box at the top of our main page. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events. Follow us on social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Comparison of Nazism and Stalinism neutrality

So, if neutrality is wikipedia's aim, why is there no article comparing Nazism and Free Market Ideology? At least be honest, wikipedia's aim is not neutrality but the promotion of certain viewpoints 79.166.2.110 (talk) 01:34, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

If an article on something doesn't exist, but you think it should, you could always create one. Just make sure that you have reliable sources that discuss the subject, and it's not just a collection of your own opinions. Egsan Bacon (talk) 02:36, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

I think your passive aggressive response proves my point, wikipedia doesn't care about neutrality, only to perpetuate the dominant western "free" market narrative. Have a nice day.79.166.2.110 (talk) 17:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

unsuitable user name violation possible

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I noticed that your username, "Egsan Bacon", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Misplaced Pages does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Misplaced Pages in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Your username is Pfox2, and your first edit was to an organization that uses the acronym PFOX. Do you have any affiliation with the organization?2600:1700:7610:41E0:D5C4:D351:FD4C:3F1F (talk) 00:58, 9 March 2022 (UTC)