Talk:Cat's Eye Nebula: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 20:55, 15 January 2007 editWilliamKF (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,422 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:44, 12 February 2007 edit undoGimmeBot (talk \| contribs)Bots75,273 editsm GimmeBot updating {{ArticleHistory}}Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{skiptotoctalk}}		{{skiptotoctalk}}
			{{ArticleHistory
	{{featured}}
			\|action1=FAC
	{{Mainpage date\|June 15\|2005}}
			\|action1date=03:43, 9 Jan 2005
			\|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/Cat's Eye Nebula
			\|action1result=promoted
			\|action1oldid=9262637
			\|maindate=June 15, 2005
			\|currentstatus=FA
			}}
	{{v0.5\|class=FA\|category=Natsci}}		{{v0.5\|class=FA\|category=Natsci}}
	{{WPAstronomy\|object=yes\|class=FA}}		{{WPAstronomy\|object=yes\|class=FA}}

Revision as of 22:44, 12 February 2007

Skip to table of contents

Cat's Eye Nebula is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 15, 2005.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 9, 2005	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Template:V0.5

Astronomy: Astronomical objects FA‑class

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Misplaced Pages.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
FA	This article has been rated as FA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

Template:FAOL

Ambiguous sentence

From the article:

The image reveals two 'caps' of less ionised material at the edge of the nebula

Should it be read as that the material in these regions are less ionised compared to other regions; or that the concentration of ionised particles is lower, or something else?

If it is singly ionized nitrogen; does it have to be mentioned at all? In such case it is already mentioned in the text that green represents singly ionized nitrogen. Gunnar Larsson 19:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Images

Why have they suddenly all disappeared? Several beautiful NASA public domain images have been deleted for no apparent reason.

The question has been here for a month, and no explanation offered.... were they just deleted for fun, then? 81.179.65.38 00:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Categories: