| Revision as of 13:24, 8 February 2007 editBjrobinson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users774 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:51, 13 February 2007 edit undoBjrobinson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users774 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| Stick to what i know. Mainly planning, transport and urban studies. | Stick to what i know. Mainly planning, transport and urban studies. | ||
| ''"Misplaced Pages's NPOV policy must not be misused so it becomes synonymous with ], ], ], or ]. Editors must '''actively enable''' the presentation of '''all significant sides of any ].''' To leave out one side amounts to promoting the other side's POV. Misplaced Pages should include ''more'' information than other encyclopedias, not ''less''. | |||
| Quite happy with my marathons improving the ] and ] articles - Sources and references are now the priority. | |||
| The best articles are produced through the collaborative efforts of editors who hold opposing POV, who truly understand the NPOV policy, and who either "]" themselves, or who at least don't suppress it. As regards other's POV, they are ], rather than ] who exercise POV ]. Collaborative editors work in a "]" relationship. This ensures that all significant POV are presented without being promoted. What could be more Wikipedian than that? It's fantastic when it works, but such a relationship is rare on ]. -- <i><b><font color="004000">]</font></b></i> (<b><font color="990099" size="1">]</font></b>) 11:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)"''. Fyslee is whay better than JGaz who is a deletionist bum. | |||
| Having a go at MassTransit this article is a bloody mess atm... | |||
| == Larger / hard work edits == | == Larger / hard work edits == | ||
Revision as of 12:51, 13 February 2007
User: Bjrobinson
|
Stick to what i know. Mainly planning, transport and urban studies.
"Misplaced Pages's NPOV policy must not be misused so it becomes synonymous with revisionism, censorship, whitewashing, or political correctness. Editors must actively enable the presentation of all significant sides of any controversy. To leave out one side amounts to promoting the other side's POV. Misplaced Pages should include more information than other encyclopedias, not less.
The best articles are produced through the collaborative efforts of editors who hold opposing POV, who truly understand the NPOV policy, and who either "write for the enemy" themselves, or who at least don't suppress it. As regards other's POV, they are inclusionists, rather than deletionists who exercise POV suppressionism. Collaborative editors work in a "checks and balances" relationship. This ensures that all significant POV are presented without being promoted. What could be more Wikipedian than that? It's fantastic when it works, but such a relationship is rare on controversial subjects. -- Fyslee's (First law) 11:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)". Fyslee is whay better than JGaz who is a deletionist bum.
Larger / hard work edits
- Urban planning,
- Local Transport Plan,
- Strategic Environmental Assessment,
- Severn Beach Line,
- Inselkampf,
- Urban Renaissance,
- Regional planning,
- Cider.
Started
- National Playing Fields Association
- Land use planning,
- Easton, Bristol
- Sacnoth,
- Regional Spatial Strategy,
- Urban Rural Fringe,
- Urban Decay, Started this page and did a pretty bad job of it. Have been trying to improve it.
- Statutory Undertakers
- Esme Every Esme i've met has been so lovely.
- Cybernations
- Alot of stubs
Tiny / stubs
Arcadia_(ship,2005), Stapleton Road railway station, Severn Beach, PTAL, AADT, + others
Misc.
Journey to work, Green belt, BANANA,
R.I.P
Deloria Working Archive Version
Categories: