| Revision as of 15:37, 18 February 2022 editMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 14:32, 25 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWB | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| ]] '''delete''' - see ] ] 23:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | ]] '''delete''' - see ] ] 23:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Weak Delete''' - ] is notable but this is probably ].] |
*'''Weak Delete''' - ] is notable but this is probably ].] ] 15:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete'''. ] might be notable enough to deserve an article, but this is not. Merge any salvagable content to ]. ] | ] 08:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. ] might be notable enough to deserve an article, but this is not. Merge any salvagable content to ]. ] | ] 08:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| *'''Delete'''. See ] AfD discussion for details. ] 03:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. See ] AfD discussion for details. ] 03:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small>] |
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small>] ] 01:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' No sources whatsoever, no evidence of ]. The article mentions the work of only a single individual . Agree there's no reason not to simply fold the discussion into the ] article. --] 03:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' No sources whatsoever, no evidence of ]. The article mentions the work of only a single individual . Agree there's no reason not to simply fold the discussion into the ] article. --] 03:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:32, 25 March 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete - and Ray isn't notable either. DS 21:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Pseudorealism in Indian Art
delete - see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Devajyoti Ray 4.18GB 23:42, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - Devajyoti Ray is notable but this is probably cruft.Bakaman Bakatalk 15:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Devajyoti Ray might be notable enough to deserve an article, but this is not. Merge any salvagable content to Devajyoti Ray. utcursch | talk 08:54, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. See Devajyoti Ray AfD discussion for details. Pavel Vozenilek 03:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. Bakaman Bakatalk 01:58, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete No sources whatsoever, no evidence of WP:Notability. The article mentions the work of only a single individual . Agree there's no reason not to simply fold the discussion into the Devajyoti Ray article. --Shirahadasha 03:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete as per Utcursch - move anything not fancruft to Devajyoti Ray. Elomis 21:34, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.