| Revision as of 00:51, 8 March 2006 editMailer diablo (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators55,575 edits Closing debate; result was delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:17, 29 March 2022 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)Tag: AWBNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div> | :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''</div> | ||
Revision as of 17:17, 29 March 2022
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Turdilinear Forms
An architectural movement prodded as hoax, tag removed by creator with no explanation and no references provided. Reprodded as a hoax presumably by someone who didn't check the page history. Moving here as a contested deletion. It doesn't Google, so I'm inclined to think it's a hoax. Unless we get some references, delete. NickelShoe 21:41, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as hoax and complete bollocks, especially the “Shit Lock Dry Wall” system Fan1967 22:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Probably a speedy delete as a {{db-nonsense}} candidate. (aeropagitica) 23:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete unless some verification is forthcoming. --Aim Here 23:19, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Or maybe flush would be more appropriate. --Elkman - 03:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Lockley 22:23, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Fan1967 -- Alpha269 00:47, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.