Talk:Vajrayana: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 15:13, 28 April 2022 editMrDemeanour (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users4,040 edits →Devanagari: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:48, 28 April 2022 edit undoMrDemeanour (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users4,040 edits →Devanagari Next edit →
Line 59:		Line 59:
	@Javierfv1212 said in an edit-comment () that "Buddhists never used devanagari", and proceeded to replace devanagari representations of Sanskrit in this article with Brahmi representations. So which Buddhists never used devanagari?		@Javierfv1212 said in an edit-comment () that "Buddhists never used devanagari", and proceeded to replace devanagari representations of Sanskrit in this article with Brahmi representations. So which Buddhists never used devanagari?

			This paper describes translating the Buddhacarita from a devanagari original. it says: "The Buddha-carita or Life of Buddha by Aśvaghoṣa,
	In ], it says: "The first Buddhist texts were initially passed on orally by Buddhist monastics, but were later written down and composed as manuscripts in various Indo-Aryan languages (such as Pāli, Gāndhārī, and Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit) and collected into various Buddhist Canons." Is that article wrong?
			Indian poet of the early second century after Christ. Sanskrit
			text, edited from a Devanagari and two Nepalese manuscripts with
			variant readings, a preface, notes and in index of names."

			Doesn't that mean that devanagari was indeed used by Buddhists?

	Brahmi script, on the other hand, which the editor seems to favour, while being very ancient and apparently known to the Buddha, isn't mentioned in the ] article. No Buddhist texts were written down for a good 200 years anyway, so what the Buddha knew how to write is neither here nor there. There don't seem to be many attestations of Brahmi script at all, in fact, and most of them seem to be fragmentary.		Brahmi script, on the other hand, which the editor seems to favour, while being very ancient and apparently known to the Buddha, isn't mentioned in the ] article. No Buddhist texts were written down for a good 200 years anyway, so what the Buddha knew how to write is neither here nor there. There don't seem to be many attestations of Brahmi script at all, in fact, and most of them seem to be fragmentary.

Revision as of 15:48, 28 April 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vajrayana article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Buddhism Top‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Tibet Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Tibet High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Bhutan High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bhutan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bhutan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BhutanWikipedia:WikiProject BhutanTemplate:WikiProject BhutanBhutan
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

South Asia Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WP1.0

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:Vital article

The difference between Nirvana and Buddha hood.

Nirvana is a Sanskrit word as you well know, but did you know it consists of tree words, Nir Vad Djna, literally this mean “Without wrong thought”, at least this is what my teacher Chhimed Rigdzin Rinpoche taught me. To reach Nirvana is to come to the end of ones preconceived ideas, to the place where the world is new at every moment.

Buddha hood is to gain the state of a Buddha, to be a Buddha is to gain throughout ages an accumulation of merits or positive accumulated fearlessness to deal with the parts of life that beings do not like to deal with and witch make up what is commonly known as the subconscious. Having gained a storage of “good merit” one will have the connection to a whole world of sentient beings, through ones work, and so will start at a proper time a new world cycle of Buddhist teachings.

To become a Buddha and to attain Nirvana is one and the same, there is no difference between the two, in actual experience. To reach Nirvana is like becoming truly sane. And to become a Buddha is to become the King of Fearlessness.

Nirvana you may gain for you self anytime but becoming a Buddha is another matter. --Mitrapa 16:32, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)Mitrapa.

Different teachers give different etymologies for the word "nirvana". The most common is as follows: "nir" is the prefix meaning "to cease" or "to stop"; "vaana" means "blowing": thus "extinguished" or "blown out" would be the literal translation. - --Bodhirakshita 03:53, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

where to put this?

don't know yet.

Deity practice

I removed the following, misleading fragment from the article:

"Deity Tantra is often practiced at the moment directly prior to sexual climax. The practitioner takes a consort and this is practiced in pairs. Often times the couple pictures themselves as the deities in the mandala making love."

It gives the impression that tantric buddhist deity practices are predominantly done in a "sexual" setting. In reality however, these deity practices are just meditation practices - with no consort involved. In anuttarayogatantra, the deities often do have consorts, but anuttarayogatantra is not relevant to most tantric practitioners.

Notes

Deity yoga

Deity yoga should be its own article, as both this article and Tibetan Buddhist practice have long sections on it which should be merged. Skyerise (talk) 13:57, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Devanagari

@Javierfv1212 said in an edit-comment () that "Buddhists never used devanagari", and proceeded to replace devanagari representations of Sanskrit in this article with Brahmi representations. So which Buddhists never used devanagari?

This paper describes translating the Buddhacarita from a devanagari original. it says: "The Buddha-carita or Life of Buddha by Aśvaghoṣa, Indian poet of the early second century after Christ. Sanskrit text, edited from a Devanagari and two Nepalese manuscripts with variant readings, a preface, notes and in index of names."

Doesn't that mean that devanagari was indeed used by Buddhists?

Brahmi script, on the other hand, which the editor seems to favour, while being very ancient and apparently known to the Buddha, isn't mentioned in the Buddhist texts article. No Buddhist texts were written down for a good 200 years anyway, so what the Buddha knew how to write is neither here nor there. There don't seem to be many attestations of Brahmi script at all, in fact, and most of them seem to be fragmentary.

Can I revert this edit?

MrDemeanour (talk) 15:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

Categories: