Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Australian television: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:56, 23 November 2021 editSatDis (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,814 edits OzTAM Ratings data via TV Tonight← Previous edit Revision as of 16:00, 29 April 2022 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,055 edits User script to detect unreliable sources: new sectionTag: MassMessage deliveryNext edit →
Line 28: Line 28:


: Wow, this is big news. Also interested to see what others think. ] (]) 21:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC) : Wow, this is big news. Also interested to see what others think. ] (]) 21:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

== User script to detect unreliable sources ==

{{Main|User:Headbomb/unreliable}}
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to ] and ]s. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the ]. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. (<code><nowiki>John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.</nowiki></code>)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "{{highlight||pink}}" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{tl|cite web}}, {{tl|cite journal}} and {{tl|doi}}.

The script is mostly based on ], ] and ] and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is '''not a script to be mindlessly used''', and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at ]. Questions, comments and requests can be made at ].

- &#32;<span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span>

<span style="font-size:90%">This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.</span> Delivered by: ] (]) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Headbomb/sandbox3&oldid=1085285969 -->

Revision as of 16:00, 29 April 2022

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Australian television and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months 
WikiProject iconAustralia: Television Project‑class
WikiProject iconWikiProject Australian television is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
ProjectThis page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This page is supported by WikiProject Australian television.

Relevant discussion

There is an ongoing discussion occuring at WP:TFD which may be interests to the followers of this page. –MJLTalk 22:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Monday Night with Matty Johns

This article should be moved to Sunday Night with Matty Johns as it's now on Sundays. Thoughts? WDM10 (talk) 05:46, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Request for Assessment

I was wondering if anyone would assess the article First Day (TV series)? I am hoping for a C-class or B-class listing. Thanks. SatDis (talk) 03:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

Freeview entry on Wikidata

I had proposed a property on Wikidata to see if a entry suits onto there and once the property is being created, it is possible to link those available programme onto the Free view website. Shinjiman 01:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

OzTAM Ratings data via TV Tonight

I noticed that David Knox of TV Tonight wrote a post that said he had to delete 11 years worth of ratings reports from the site, and that OzTAM is also addressing Misplaced Pages for compliance similarly. Does this mean that we will have to remove citations for the removed data? I understand that the daily ratings wrap articles are not affected by this change, but I'm concerned that a number of articles under the project are going to have to go under major reference changes due to using the now-unavailable data. Reader781 (talk) 21:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Wow, this is big news. Also interested to see what others think. SatDis (talk) 21:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Misplaced Pages. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Categories: