| Revision as of 04:25, 29 April 2022 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,293,067 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Belarus/Archive 3) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:00, 29 April 2022 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,133,055 edits →User script to detect unreliable sources: new sectionTag: MassMessage deliveryNext edit → | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| Hi. You may or may not be interested in ]. Thanks. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 08:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC) | Hi. You may or may not be interested in ]. Thanks. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 08:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == User script to detect unreliable sources == | |||
| {{Main|User:Headbomb/unreliable}} | |||
| I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to ] and ]s. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the ]. The idea is that it takes something like | |||
| *John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. (<code><nowiki>John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.</nowiki></code>) | |||
| and turns it into something like | |||
| * John Smith "{{highlight||pink}}" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14. | |||
| It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{tl|cite web}}, {{tl|cite journal}} and {{tl|doi}}. | |||
| The script is mostly based on ], ] and ] and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed. | |||
| Do note that this is '''not a script to be mindlessly used''', and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at ]. Questions, comments and requests can be made at ]. | |||
| -  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> | |||
| <span style="font-size:90%">This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from.</span> Delivered by: ] (]) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Terasail@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Headbomb/sandbox3&oldid=1085285969 --> | |||
Revision as of 16:00, 29 April 2022
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Belarus and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
.svg){kind=small} | Belarus NA‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage WPT
To Do List
|
|
FAR for My Belarusy
I have nominated My Belarusy for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 16:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
Lukashenko articles on Belarusian Misplaced Pages
This was posted to my talk page, but I don't speak any of the relevant languages and am not in a postion to help.
Issues on be-tarask
Hey there! Thought I'd message you about some concerns of mine regarding the lack of neutrality on the be-tarask Misplaced Pages. ...
Currently, its article on Alexander Lukashenko says in part:
- Alexander Lukashenko ... is the head of the Russian occupation administration, a puppet, pro-Russian, authoritarian leader of Belarus who holds power by rigging elections and terrorizing Belarusians with financial, military, and informational support from Russia. ... On April 21, Russian President Vladimir Putin mentioned Belarus in the context of an alleged FSB attempt to overthrow the Lukashenko regime as a Russian-controlled territory in which Russia would determine what was a coup and what was not.
(At least, according to Google Translate). A similar descriptor is given on the "Lukashenko regime" article (which also exists in Ukrainian, but seems to use more neutral language).
There also appears to be a "Russian occupation of Belarus" article (does not exist in any other language, including standard Belarusian), which says:
- The Russian occupation of Belarus is the de facto Russian occupation of Belarus, an open demonstration of which took place on February 24, 2022, when the Russian invasion of Ukraine took place, including from the territory of Belarus. The Russian occupation administration is a puppet regime of Lukashenko, its head is the proclaimed "president" Alexander Lukashenko. One of the main measures taken by the Russian authorities (the Russian Empire, the USSR, the Russian Federation) and its occupation administrations at different times is the continuous violent Russification of Belarusians. The term "Russian occupation of Belarus" first appeared in the autumn of 1917.
This seems to be promoting false histories and original research (Lukashenko is pro-Russian and democracy doesn't really exist in the country, but it is not an "occupation" in the conventional sense, and the link to 1917 appears novel).
These are just two that caught my eye. I don't know whether this is limited to a few articles, or whether it is a more ingrained issue of ideological bias on the Taraškievica wiki in a similar vein to the Croatian Misplaced Pages situation. Notably, Taraškievica is spoken by the Belarusian diaspora, who I suspect are statistically more likely to be anti-regime. —AFreshStart (talk) 14:59, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Someone(s) from this wikiproject will be in a better position to help regulate the content over there. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 21:31, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
FAR for National emblem of Belarus
I have nominated National emblem of Belarus for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 17:30, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
AfD
Hi. You may or may not be interested in this AfD. Thanks. Lugnuts 08:33, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
User script to detect unreliable sources
Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliableI have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Misplaced Pages. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Categories: