Talk:Physical Address Extension: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:44, 1 May 2022 edit97.115.191.42 (talk) →First Linux kernel to support PAE: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:10, 2 May 2022 edit undoClueBot III (talk \| contribs)Bots1,372,816 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Physical Address Extension/Archives/2022/February. (BOT)Next edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:
	\|archivenow=<nowiki>{{ArchiveNow}},{{ArchiveThisNowPlease}},{{resolved\|,{{Resolved\|,{{done}},{{Done}},{{Done\|}}</nowiki>		\|archivenow=<nowiki>{{ArchiveNow}},{{ArchiveThisNowPlease}},{{resolved\|,{{Resolved\|,{{done}},{{Done}},{{Done\|}}</nowiki>
	}}		}}

	== 32 bit Windows specific ==

	If the Microsoft Windows discussed is specific to 32 bit, then it would be more clearer to put them in the header.
	As many people who reads the page for quick reference may miss this detail.

	] (]) 17:40, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

	: PAE is a processor feature. Information about support in specific OSs (Windows or otherwise) therefore does not belong in the article header. The processor feature would exist even if no OSs supported it. ] (]) 17:59, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

	:: A hardware topic mentioning software doesn't seem at all out of place to me. Other hardware topics do mention in the lead, even first sentence, so ] would say it's OK. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span>; ]</span> 22:03, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

	== PAE Xeon only ==		== PAE Xeon only ==

Revision as of 02:10, 2 May 2022

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Physical Address Extension article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

PAE Xeon only

It should be made clear the only IA-32 processor which supported Physical Address Extension as defined by Intel was Xeon. PAE requires BOTH 36 address registers AND 36bit data bus for RAM.

All IA-32 processors had at most a 32bit data bus. 36 address registers only allows paging - it is not PAE support.

Only Xeon had 36bits for RAM. Xeon supported 8GB RAM total. The 8GB was split into 2x 4GB memory banks accessed one bank at a time. The 32bit + 4bit bus allowed a segment selector. (Xeon was technically a 36bit CPU).

Onzite. (talk) 23:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

No, as that's rubbish. Where's the definition of that per Intel? The article currently has it right Physical Address Extension#Hardware support - the chipset and motherboard etc have to also support 36 bit, which I know myself certainly some non-Xeons did. Widefox; talk 22:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

First Linux kernel to support PAE

The section says 2.3.23 but under the old scheme odd numbers were development kernels (2.2 series was the release, 2.3 was concurrent and the development space for what would ship as 2.4). Would probably make sense to also mention which kernel was the first to ship with PAE, since no released distro would use a development kernel. --97.115.191.42 (talk) 03:44, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Categories: