Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 09:16, 11 June 2022

Ashley Gjøvik
Born	1985 or 1986 (age 38–39)
Occupation	Program manager
Known for	Whistleblowing at Apple Inc.

Ashley Gjøvik (born 1985 or 1986) is an American program manager who is known for her whistleblowing and labor complaints against Apple Inc.

Apple fired her in September 2021 for leaking confidential intellectual property, which Gjøvik denies, alleging she was terminated illegally for raising concerns about employee privacy, safety, harassment, and discrimination. Her firing is being investigated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the National Labor Relations Board.

Gjøvik made a number of public whistleblower complaints with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission about Apple. She reported her employee privacy concerns to multiple government bodies in the United States and Europe, which as of April 2022, were being assessed for merit by the respective agencies.

Education and career

Gjøvik completed a Bachelor of Science in Liberal Studies from Portland State University in 2012, and earned a Project Management Professional certification in 2013.

Following working for Nike, Inc., Gjøvik began working at Apple in 2015, and remained there until September 2021, by which time she had become a senior engineering program manager working out of their Sunnyvale, California office. While working at Apple, Gjøvik also studied transitional justice at University of Oxford and began a Juris Doctor degree at Santa Clara University law school. She also worked with a law group that helps asylum seekers, and has published writing about public health, privacy, and human rights.

Apple complaints

After raising concerns internally with Apple, Gjøvik began speaking openly on Twitter and to press. Her allegations against Apple include mishandling of environmental concerns, violations of employee privacy, harassment, and retaliation. Her allegations were under investigation as of December 2021. Gjøvik said she made $386,000 in 2021 prior to her termination, and is asking for reinstatement if the agencies find that Apple fired her unlawfully.

Environmental health and safety concerns

On March 17, 2021, Gjøvik received an email from Apple's environmental health and safety team notifying staff of forthcoming required vapor intrusion testing at the Sunnyvale office building, which is located on a Superfund site. She asked the team what type of testing had been done in the previous six years, and says she was told not to discuss her concerns with other employees. She continued to press Apple for information on the reasons for the environmental testing and its results, and says that she was subsequently harassed and humiliated. The EPA said that Apple did not open the location until indoor air sampling in 2015 confirmed it was safe, and was most recently tested per the EPA's demi-decennial requirement on September 18, 2019.

Gjøvik said she had fainted at work and did not know why, and that this had contributed to her concerns that Apple had not properly tested the site for contaminants. She also believed Apple had not sufficiently informed employees of the possible health issue. Gjøvik accused Apple of exposing her and more than 100 other employees in Sunnyvale to hazardous chemicals. Gjøvik ultimately filed complaints with the EPA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). As of 2021, the NLRB and OSHA were investigating Gjøvik’s retaliation complaints. The EPA conducted an on-site visit on August 19, 2021 and determined "the likelihood for vapor intrusion is low and not expected."

Gjøvik said that when she asked Apple's employee relations team what options there were for her health-related concerns prior to the company-mandated return-to-office plans following the early COVID-19 pandemic, originally planned for September 1, 2021, but later delayed, she said the representative suggested she file an Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) accommodations request to continue working remotely. She said she was given a medical release form to fill out to allow a third-party processor, Sedgwick Claims Management, and Apple to access her medical records. Gjøvik said she refused to fill it out unless only Sedgwick was given access to her medical records. Gjøvik never received the accommodation.

Employee privacy concerns

Gjøvik has spoken publicly about privacy concerns as an Apple employee. In 2018, Gjøvik's engineering team was involved in a lawsuit, and because she had worked on a project that was relevant to the lawsuit, lawyers requested files from her phone and computer and told her not to delete any files. Gjøvik said her team had recommended against keeping separate phones for her personal and professional use, a practice that other Apple employees also said was commonplace. Gjøvik had personal documents on the phone, including nude photographs, and when she asked if she could delete the photographs, she said the lawyers said no.

"Glimmer", formerly known as "Gobbler", was an internal tool that was created to test Apple's Face ID software before its 2017 launch. The app took photos and brief videos when it sensed a face. Gjøvik described the app as "spyware", saying, "It was taking photos of me in my home, in my bathroom, in bed, anywhere I had my phone ... And it stored these photos somewhere and uploads them sometimes to some place— didn't tell us much". Gjøvik had signed an informed consent form before the app was installed, though Gjøvik and other Apple staff have alleged that agreeing to help test software like Glimmer on company-owned devices was expected of them, with Gjøvik referring to the practice as a "loyalty test". Uploads containing photos or other sensitive data was done manually by employees. Some non-sensitive data was uploaded automatically unless employees turned it off.

Gjøvik spoke to press about her concerns pertaining to data privacy with an internal bug tracking tool called "Radar", which stores reports indefinitely and has broad defaults for employee access. Apple instructs its employees not to upload sensitive, confidential, or private data to work tools like Radar. Gjøvik filed a bug report in 2019 about Apple's photo search software returning "a selfie I took of myself in bed after laparoscopic surgery to treat my endometriosis" when she entered the search term "infant". The report could not be subsequently removed, and the default sharing settings allowed Apple's entire software engineering team to view the details of the report.

In September 2021, Gjøvik criticized Apple's employee privacy policy, which she says states that workers have no expectation of privacy when using a personal device for Apple business. She says the implication of possible employee surveillance under the policies led her to walk around her apartment and unplug all of her electronics and remove all of her personal information off of Apple's servers.

In April 2022, she brought her complaints to the United Kingdom, lodging a complaint with the Data Protection Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). She also brought the complaint to ICO's counterpart in Brussels, the Data Protection Commissioner in Ireland, and the non-profit privacy protection organization Big Brother Watch. The ICO said they are assessing the concerns, which allege unlawful data collection and invasion of employee privacy, raised by Gjøvik.

Harassment and discrimination

Gjøvik has alleged that Apple pressured her into revealing details of sexual harassment she had experienced after she mentioned the incident in an unrelated meeting with a member of Apple's human resources department. She said that Apple took no action related to her report except to reveal her to the employee she had accused. Gjøvik also complained to Apple about sex discrimination from a male manager, and Apple closed an investigation into the incident finding no wrongdoing. Following the closure of the investigation, she wrote on Twitter about the experience on August 2, 2021, "Wanted to share: #Apple employee relations confirmed this #tonepolicing is totally ok feedback for me to get from my #bigtech #male leaders & not #sexist. As this investigation rolls on, I've decided to start Tweeting the stuff they say is 'ok.' I mean, they did say it was ok?" In the tweet, she attached a screenshot of feedback from a manager who wrote that he "didn't hear you going up an octave at the end of your statements" and that she "came across as much more authoritative". Apple opened a second investigation into the allegations in August 2021, and she was placed on paid administrative leave. Apple has said they "don't discuss any individual employee matters, out of respect for the privacy of the people involved", and "are and have always been deeply committed to creating and maintaining a positive and inclusive workplace," and they "take all concerns seriously" and "thoroughly investigate whenever a concern is raised."

Administrative leave and firing

Gjøvik alleges that after raising concerns internally and speaking publicly about her concerns with Apple, she was retaliated against repeatedly, and was reassigned. On August 4, 2021, Apple placed her on indefinite paid administrative leave for the duration of the investigation, which she said she requested as a "last resort", and which she later described as "forced" and as a "suspension" in her complaint filed with OSHA. Gjøvik subsequently filed additional various complaints about Apple with the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and the United States Department of Justice. Both the DFEH and EEOC issued Gjøvik right to sue letters, which enable her to file discrimination lawsuits at the state or federal level.

On August 26, 2021, Gjøvik filed a charge with the NLRB, alleging retaliation as well as harassment by a manager and forced administrative leave. In October 2021, Gjøvik filed a whistleblower complaint with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) about alleged false statements by Apple to the SEC, pertaining to Apple's no-action letter filed earlier that month stating that their "policy is not to use clauses". Cher Scarlett also filed a whistleblower complaint with the SEC about the no-action letter, providing the agency with a post-employment contract she was offered earlier that month. The no-action filing was subsequently denied by the SEC.

On September 9, 2021, a member of Apple's human resources team contacted her, asking to speak about "a sensitive Intellectual Property matter". Gjøvik replied that she would speak to them, but that the conversation would need to be captured in writing, and she would forward it to the NLRB. Apple replied, "Since you have chosen not to participate in the discussion ... we will move forward with the information that we have" and suspended her employee access. She was formally fired in a third email later that day which stated she had "engaged in conduct that warrants termination of employment, including, but not limited to, violations of Apple policies". The violations claimed by Apple were that she had "disclosed confidential product-related information in violation of Apple policies" and that she had "failed to cooperate and to provide accurate and complete information during the Apple investigatory process". Gjøvik has denied these allegations, referring to the termination as retaliation for speaking out and filing complaints about the company with multiple agencies. She later filed additional charges with the NLRB and the United States Department of Labor for retaliation, which are being investigated by the respective parties.

Gjøvik had previously posted on Twitter a photograph of herself that had been taken by Glimmer, and screenshots of an email that asked her to volunteer to have her ears 3D-scanned to aid in AirPods development. On September 15, 2021, she was asked to remove the two tweets in an email from the O'Melveny & Myers law firm, on behalf of Apple. The email claimed the tweets were violating a confidentiality agreement she had signed when she first joined the company. Gjøvik complied with the request to remove the tweets, though in communications via a lawyer to Apple she argued that the material she had shared was not labeled confidential and did not contain anything secret or proprietary, and that the photograph of her could not reasonably be argued to be copyrighted by Apple.

Following her termination and subsequent retaliation charges, Gjøvik filed an additional charge with the NLRB against Apple in October 2021 following news of a company-wide memo from Tim Cook sent to employees on September 21, 2021. The memo was criticized for conflating product leaks with employee activism around workplace conditions, and for including the line, "people who leak confidential information do not belong here," which some interpreted as threatening. Gjøvik alleged that the memo violated the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 in her charge, and additionally challenged several policies in the employee handbook that she said illegally inhibit staff from exercising their federally-protected rights to talk to the press, discuss wages, and post on social media. She, and some other legal professionals, believe that this particular charge, if prosecuted, could overturn a "Trump Era" precedent governing workplace policies involving Boeing from December 2017, which weigh employee rights against legitimate business interests. She also said she hopes to disrupt the company's culture of secrecy.

See also

• Apple worker organizations
• Frances Haugen
• Timnit Gebru
• Ifeoma Ozoma

References

1. ^ Cameron, Dell (October 14, 2021). "Apple Wanted Her Fired. It Settled On an Absurd Excuse". Gizmodo. Archived from the original on October 15, 2021. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
2. Gjøvik, Ashley (July 24, 2021). "Ashley Gjøvik" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on July 25, 2021.
3. "Ashley M. Gjøvik". Business Insider. Archived from the original on December 31, 2021. Retrieved December 31, 2021.
4. ^ Burton, Lucy (April 17, 2022). "Apple whistleblower Ashley Gjøvik: 'My life is a goddamn nightmare now'". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved April 19, 2022.
5. McGee, Patrick; Temple-West, Patrick (December 13, 2021). "Apple faces probe over whether it retaliated against whistleblower". Financial Times. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
6. ^ Schiffer, Zoe (September 9, 2021). "Apple fires senior engineering program manager Ashley Gjøvik for allegedly leaking information". The Verge. Archived from the original on September 10, 2021. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
7. ^ Gjøvik, Ashley (September 16, 2021). "I was fired from Apple after making several labor complaints against the company. Speaking out feels like going up against a powerful government". Business Insider. Archived from the original on September 16, 2021. Retrieved December 31, 2021.
8. ^ Schiffer, Zoe (August 30, 2021). "Apple cares about privacy, unless you work at Apple". The Verge. Archived from the original on August 30, 2021. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
9. ^ McGee, Patrick; Temple-West, Patrick (December 13, 2021). "Apple faces probe over whether it retaliated against whistleblower". Financial Times. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
10. US EPA, OLEM (September 23, 2015). "Vapor Intrusion at Superfund Sites". www.epa.gov. Retrieved April 25, 2022.
11. ^ Bright, Martin (2021). ""Apple poisoned me: physically, mentally, spiritually"". Index on Censorship. 50 (4): 42–44. doi:10.1177/03064220211068699. ISSN 0306-4220.
12. ^ Eidelson, Josh (October 12, 2021). "Apple CEO's Anti-Leak Edict Broke Law, Ex-Employee Alleges". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on October 13, 2021. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
13. US EPA, OLEM (August 2021). "Superfund Sites in Reuse in California". Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved March 19, 2022.
14. "TRW MICROWAVE, INC (BUILDING 825) Site Profile". cumulis.epa.gov. Retrieved April 25, 2022.
15. ^ McGee, Patrick (September 3, 2021). "US labour board examines retaliation claims against Apple". Financial Times. Retrieved March 19, 2022.
16. Hamilton, Isobel Asher (December 14, 2021). "OSHA is investigating Apple over its treatment of employees". Business Insider. Retrieved April 20, 2022.
17. "EPA Site Visit and Vapor Intrusion Field Assessment, 825 Stewart Avenue Sunnyvale, CA, TRW Microwave Superfund Site (CERCLIS ID# CAD009159088)" (PDF). semspub.epa.gov. October 7, 2021. Retrieved May 29, 2022.
18. Nicas, Jack; Isaac, Mike (July 20, 2021). "Apple delays its return to office as the Delta variant surges". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 3, 2022.
19. Schiffer, Zoe (September 30, 2021). "Apple's fortress of secrecy is crumbling from the inside". The Verge. Archived from the original on September 30, 2021. Retrieved January 3, 2022.
20. Roach, Sarah (September 20, 2021). "Worker surveillance is making employees miserable". Protocol — The people, power and politics of tech. Retrieved January 3, 2022.
21. Burton, Lucy (April 10, 2022). "Apple whistleblower brings spying claims to UK". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved April 17, 2022.
22. ^ Schiffer, Zoe (August 4, 2021). "Apple places female engineering program manager on administrative leave after tweeting about sexism in the office". The Verge. Archived from the original on August 4, 2021. Retrieved December 31, 2021.
23. ^ Savov, Vlad; Eidelson, Josh (September 9, 2021). "Apple Fires Manager Who Complained; She Gains Right to Sue". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on September 10, 2021. Retrieved January 3, 2022.
24. ^ Browning, Kellen (December 13, 2021). "The Labor Department is investigating Apple's treatment of employees". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 31, 2021.
25. Snider, Mike (October 17, 2021). "Fired co-leader of #AppleToo worker activist group to file federal complaints". USA Today. Retrieved April 25, 2022.
26. Nicas, Jack; Browning, Kellen (September 17, 2021). "Tim Cook Faces Surprising Employee Unrest at Apple". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
27. Hays, Kali (September 10, 2021). "Program manager fired by Apple allegedly over workplace complaints receives right to sue from federal agency". Business Insider. Archived from the original on September 11, 2021. Retrieved January 3, 2022.
28. Savov, Vlad; Eidelson, Josh (September 10, 2021). "Apple Fires Manager Who Complained; She Gains Right to Sue". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on September 10, 2021. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
29. ^ Love, Julia; Nellis, Stephen (December 22, 2021). "U.S. SEC allows Apple shareholder's push for details on non-disclosure". Reuters. Retrieved December 30, 2021.
30. Drange, Matt (November 22, 2021). "Apple told the SEC it doesn't silence employees regarding workplace harassment or discrimination. New whistleblower documents show that isn't true". Business Insider. Archived from the original on November 23, 2021. Retrieved December 31, 2021.
31. Hays, Kali (September 16, 2021). "Apple hit by another NLRB charge for firing senior manager who complained of harassment". Business Insider. Archived from the original on September 17, 2021. Retrieved December 31, 2021.
32. Fried, Ina (December 14, 2021). "Labor Department digs into complaint against Apple". Axios. Retrieved December 31, 2021.
33. Schiffer, Zoe (September 22, 2021). "Tim Cook says employees who leak memos do not belong at Apple, according to leaked memo". The Verge. Retrieved January 3, 2022.
34. Mak, Aaron (October 27, 2021). "How Leakers Get Dealt With in Silicon Valley". Slate. Archived from the original on October 27, 2021. Retrieved January 3, 2022.
35. "NLRB Establishes New Standard Governing Workplace Policies, and Upholds No-Camera Policy in Boeing". National Labor Relations Board. Archived from the original on December 23, 2017. Retrieved January 3, 2022.

External links

• Official website
• Ashley Gjøvik on Twitter

• 1980s births
• 21st-century American women writers
• 21st-century American writers
• American whistleblowers
• Apple Inc. employees
• Living people
• Portland State University alumni
• Workers' rights activists