| Revision as of 05:52, 17 June 2022 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,292,080 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Joshua Jonathan/Archive 2022) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:09, 19 June 2022 edit undoVordt (talk | contribs)19 edits →Kuru kingdom: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| Hey JJ. Hoping everything is well. Just catching up on the new user in the Swaminarayan section and their edits are giving a strong feeling of a potential Swamiblue return. I had originally proposed adding the Lekh to the scriptures section and was curb stomped by the pro-baps socks and their consensus stacking. Only user account to vote for its inclusion besides me was AppleButter221. Ultimately that user got blocked as a sock of SwamiBlue and once you arrived and found a better way to include mention of the lekh on the page, a dedicated scriptures section didn't make sense anymore. I walked some of the user history of the new account and AppleButter and these two edits caught my eye. . only user I can see who ever brought up that news story for inclusion on the page. Just the over all editing tendencies seem to match swamiblue but didn't know if you felt the same way or I'm being paranoid. The new user is for the most part sourcing their edits and some probably make sense. You've caught the unsourced or pov-sourced edits so far as well. ] (]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added 17:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Hey JJ. Hoping everything is well. Just catching up on the new user in the Swaminarayan section and their edits are giving a strong feeling of a potential Swamiblue return. I had originally proposed adding the Lekh to the scriptures section and was curb stomped by the pro-baps socks and their consensus stacking. Only user account to vote for its inclusion besides me was AppleButter221. Ultimately that user got blocked as a sock of SwamiBlue and once you arrived and found a better way to include mention of the lekh on the page, a dedicated scriptures section didn't make sense anymore. I walked some of the user history of the new account and AppleButter and these two edits caught my eye. . only user I can see who ever brought up that news story for inclusion on the page. Just the over all editing tendencies seem to match swamiblue but didn't know if you felt the same way or I'm being paranoid. The new user is for the most part sourcing their edits and some probably make sense. You've caught the unsourced or pov-sourced edits so far as well. ] (]) <!--Template:Undated--><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added 17:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| == Kuru kingdom == | |||
| Joshua you seem to have some problem with my edits for which i did give my citation I am using a more suitable term which is more relevant and is not under dispute for its authenticity describing videha as an ancient kingdom is more is less disputed than what was mentioned which does not provide any relevant information regarding the subject. | |||
| I thank you for your time ] (]) 14:09, 19 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:09, 19 June 2022
.jpg) the hillside swept bare behind it; the last echoes died on the white slopes; the new mount glittered and lay still in the silent valley." Evelyn Waugh, Brideshead Revisited |
.jpg) Talk, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, list |
Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeffro77 (talk • contribs) 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Missing cite in Bardo Thodol
In Dec 2014, you added short cite to "Fremantle, Fremantle & Trungpa 2003" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: ] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata•3 02:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Renata3: the reference was already there; I just converted it. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Huh? It was added in this edit. It did not exist prior in the article. Renata•3 22:49, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages Notes
What you have conveyed in the notes is probably one of the strongest genetic studies in favor of a new theory that claims that Indo-European ancestors originated in the southern Caucasus and northwestern Iran. Considering that usually no one pays attention to the notes, I think it would be much better to add this content again to the previous section. 188.159.171.172 (talk) 17:05, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Please discuss at Talk:Proto-Indo-European homeland#Misplaced Pages Notes, not here. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 03:47, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Please note vandalism in this page
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Animal_sacrifice_in_Hinduism&oldid=1091551603
This page is being vandalised by vegans 117.246.213.104 (talk) 11:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Hola
Hey JJ. Hoping everything is well. Just catching up on the new user in the Swaminarayan section and their edits are giving a strong feeling of a potential Swamiblue return. I had originally proposed adding the Lekh to the scriptures section and was curb stomped by the pro-baps socks and their consensus stacking. Only user account to vote for its inclusion besides me was AppleButter221. Ultimately that user got blocked as a sock of SwamiBlue and once you arrived and found a better way to include mention of the lekh on the page, a dedicated scriptures section didn't make sense anymore. I walked some of the user history of the new account and AppleButter and these two edits caught my eye. | 1 | 2. only user I can see who ever brought up that news story for inclusion on the page. Just the over all editing tendencies seem to match swamiblue but didn't know if you felt the same way or I'm being paranoid. The new user is for the most part sourcing their edits and some probably make sense. You've caught the unsourced or pov-sourced edits so far as well. Kbhatt22 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:44, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Kuru kingdom
Joshua you seem to have some problem with my edits for which i did give my citation I am using a more suitable term which is more relevant and is not under dispute for its authenticity describing videha as an ancient kingdom is more is less disputed than what was mentioned which does not provide any relevant information regarding the subject.
I thank you for your time Vordt (talk) 14:09, 19 June 2022 (UTC)