| Revision as of 17:13, 22 June 2022 editEesan1969 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,774 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:08, 22 June 2022 edit undoRobertsky (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators74,230 edits →Sopnendu Mohanty: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ::@] when many of the sources in the article are tangential to him as a person; lacking in depth coverage of him; are press releases; or unreliable (i.e. ]). ] (]) 16:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | ::@] when many of the sources in the article are tangential to him as a person; lacking in depth coverage of him; are press releases; or unreliable (i.e. ]). ] (]) 16:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ::@Robertsky, a few might be press releases but many are reputed international media.] (]) 16:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | ::@Robertsky, a few might be press releases but many are reputed international media.] (]) 16:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
| :::@] but not of in depth coverage of him, not of the organisations or the events. ] (]) 18:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{ping|Eesan1969}} When I looked at the first block of 8 references there was nothing there, nothing that was signifcant, independent and in-depth. Then a did a search on the man. It was kind of stuff. We can go through the references if you want at some point. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">]<sup>]</sup></span>''' 16:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | ::{{ping|Eesan1969}} When I looked at the first block of 8 references there was nothing there, nothing that was signifcant, independent and in-depth. Then a did a search on the man. It was kind of stuff. We can go through the references if you want at some point. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">]<sup>]</sup></span>''' 16:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:08, 22 June 2022
Sopnendu Mohanty
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Sopnendu Mohanty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV. Refs are passing mentions, profiles, and routine run-of-the-mill coverage of IT professional. scope_creep 15:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Singapore. Shellwood (talk) 15:53, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- How a person who serves as advisor on fintech related issues for the National University of Singapore, International Monetary Fund, Mojaloop Foundation and the Indian State Government of Odisha can be considered with a routine (run-of-the-mill coverage of) IT professional?Eesan1969 (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Eesan1969 when many of the sources in the article are tangential to him as a person; lacking in depth coverage of him; are press releases; or unreliable (i.e. WP:FORBESCON). – robertsky (talk) 16:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Robertsky, a few might be press releases but many are reputed international media.Eesan1969 (talk) 16:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Eesan1969 but not of in depth coverage of him, not of the organisations or the events. – robertsky (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Eesan1969: When I looked at the first block of 8 references there was nothing there, nothing that was signifcant, independent and in-depth. Then a did a search on the man. It was kind of stuff. We can go through the references if you want at some point. scope_creep 16:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- But when I search under the following categories, still he looks to me notable.