Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Sopnendu Mohanty: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:08, 22 June 2022 editRobertsky (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators74,131 edits Sopnendu Mohanty: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit Revision as of 19:00, 22 June 2022 edit undoYogesh Khandke (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,597 edits Sopnendu Mohanty: Keep GNGTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile editNext edit →
Line 17: Line 17:


:::Books, Scholar, WP refs ({{Find sources AFD|title=Sopnendu Mohanty}}).] (]) 17:12, 22 June 2022 (UTC) :::Books, Scholar, WP refs ({{Find sources AFD|title=Sopnendu Mohanty}}).] (]) 17:12, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
* '''Keep''': Complies with ]. ] (]) 19:00, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:00, 22 June 2022

Sopnendu Mohanty

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Sopnendu Mohanty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV. Refs are passing mentions, profiles, and routine run-of-the-mill coverage of IT professional. scope_creep 15:49, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

How a person who serves as advisor on fintech related issues for the National University of Singapore, International Monetary Fund, Mojaloop Foundation and the Indian State Government of Odisha can be considered with a routine (run-of-the-mill coverage of) IT professional?Eesan1969 (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
@Eesan1969 when many of the sources in the article are tangential to him as a person; lacking in depth coverage of him; are press releases; or unreliable (i.e. WP:FORBESCON). – robertsky (talk) 16:23, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
@Robertsky, a few might be press releases but many are reputed international media.Eesan1969 (talk) 16:27, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
@Eesan1969 but not of in depth coverage of him, not of the organisations or the events. – robertsky (talk) 18:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
@Eesan1969: When I looked at the first block of 8 references there was nothing there, nothing that was signifcant, independent and in-depth. Then a did a search on the man. It was kind of stuff. We can go through the references if you want at some point. scope_creep 16:31, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
But when I search under the following categories, still he looks to me notable.
Books, Scholar, WP refs (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL).Eesan1969 (talk) 17:12, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Categories: