Misplaced Pages

Talk:Kamala Harris: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:27, 19 June 2022 view sourceGoodDay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers492,965 edits "49th and current"← Previous edit Revision as of 21:42, 23 June 2022 view source Useitorloseit (talk | contribs)471 edits SurveyNext edit →
Line 152: Line 152:
*'''Bad RfC''' This should probably be shut down. This is the exact question posed at ]. We should just use the consensus at the Biden page and apply it to pages like this. {{ping|GoodDay}} maybe you should consider withdrawing this. ] (]) 03:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC) *'''Bad RfC''' This should probably be shut down. This is the exact question posed at ]. We should just use the consensus at the Biden page and apply it to pages like this. {{ping|GoodDay}} maybe you should consider withdrawing this. ] (]) 03:25, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
*:I'd rather combine the two, under the Biden RFC. ] (]) 03:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC) *:I'd rather combine the two, under the Biden RFC. ] (]) 03:27, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
*'''Keep''' - Just saying she's the 49th president doesn't tell you if that is the one who is in office now or not. Someone might say it's too obvious, but an encyclopedia is supposed to be matter of fact, even for "obvious" stuff. Also, this needs to be consistent with every current officeholder whose page says "current". ] (]) 21:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)


===Discussion=== ===Discussion===

Revision as of 21:42, 23 June 2022

    ? view · edit Frequently asked questions Q1: Why does Misplaced Pages say that Kamala Harris is African American/Asian American/South Asian American? A1: Misplaced Pages content is based on reliable sources (see Misplaced Pages:Verifiability, Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources). Many reliable sources, over a long period, refer to Harris as African American and Asian American, so Misplaced Pages reflects that in this article. Moreover, Harris's Senate and campaign websites state that she is African American and Asian American. Social media posts have inaccurately suggested that Harris cannot be African American because she has an Indian mother and Jamaican father. As PolitiFact notes, (see A look at Kamala Harris' multi-ethnic background and racial identity in the US, PolitiFact (August 14, 2020)), "this is a poor understanding of history, and ... the implication that Jamaicans aren't African or connected to Africa is wrong on its face." While not all Jamaican-Americans identify as "African American," Harris and many others do. When Misplaced Pages describes someone as the "first" to do something, we default to the larger category. Therefore, while Harris is the first Tamil-American, Indian-American, or South Asian-American to be Vice President of the US, we describe her, as reliable sources do, as the first Asian American to be Vice President of the US.
    This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kamala Harris article.
    This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
    Article policies
    Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
    Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 21 days 
    Warning: active arbitration remedies

    The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

    • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances)
    • You must follow the bold-revert-discuss cycle if your change is reverted. You may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message

    Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

    Further information
    Enforcement procedures:
    • Violations of any of these restrictions should be reported immediately to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
    • Editors who are aware of this topic being designated a contentious topic and who violate these restrictions may be sanctioned by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.

    With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

    • Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions.
    • Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as obvious vandalism.
    • In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
    • Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.
    • Whenever you are relying on one of these exemptions, you should refer to it in your edit summary and, if applicable, link to the discussion where consensus was clearly established.

    The contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topics sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.

    If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

    Template:Vital article

    This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
    It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
    Taskforce icon
    This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconCalifornia: San Francisco Bay Area Mid‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
    MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Taskforce icon
    This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

    Template:WikiProject Joe Biden

    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconMontreal Low‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal
    LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconLaw Enforcement Low‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
    LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconIndia Low‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
    LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconUnited States: Asian Americans Mid‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
    MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Taskforce icon
    This article is supported by WikiProject Asian Americans (assessed as Low-importance).
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconAfrican diaspora Mid‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
    MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconWomen writers Low‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
    LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconU.S. Congress Mid‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
    MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
    This article is about one (or many) person(s).
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconUniversity of California Low‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California
    LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconBlack Lives Matter Mid‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Black Lives Matter, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Black Lives Matter on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Black Lives MatterWikipedia:WikiProject Black Lives MatterTemplate:WikiProject Black Lives MatterBlack Lives Matter
    MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
    Note icon
    This article was created or improved during WikiProject Black Lives Matter's July 2020 edit-a-thon.
    WikiProject iconWomen in Red: Black women (2020)
    WikiProject iconThis article was created or improved during the Black women edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in February 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
    WikiProject iconWomen in Red: #1day1woman (2021)
    WikiProject iconThis article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2021. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
    WikiProject iconWomen in Red: #1day1woman (2020)
    WikiProject iconThis article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconWomen's History Mid‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
    MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
    WikiProject iconPolitics: American Mid‑importance
    WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
    MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
    Taskforce icon
    This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
    Media mentionThis article has been mentioned by multiple media organizations:
    This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2019, 2020, and 2021.
    This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 14 times. The weeks in which this happened:
    Section sizes
    Section size for Kamala Harris (39 sections)
    Section name Byte
    count
    Section
    total
    (Top) 7,355 7,355
    Early life and career 230 34,271
    Early life and education 16,038 16,038
    Early career 2,989 2,989
    San Francisco District Attorney (2002–2011) 15,014 15,014
    Attorney General of California (2011–2017) 15,177 15,177
    U.S. Senator (2017–2021) 33 51,019
    Election 8,573 8,573
    Tenure and political positions 2,215 39,284
    2017 8,634 8,634
    2018 8,877 8,877
    2019 14,373 14,373
    2020 3,982 3,982
    2021 1,203 1,203
    Committee assignments 2,409 2,409
    Caucus memberships 720 720
    2020 presidential election 33 21,020
    Presidential campaign 13,269 13,269
    Vice presidential campaign 7,718 7,718
    Vice presidency (2021–present) 5,109 33,570
    Senate presidency 8,341 8,341
    Immigration 13,878 13,878
    Foreign policy 6,242 6,242
    2024 presidential election 941 12,956
    Presidential campaign 12,015 12,015
    Political positions 5,505 17,491
    Abortion 3,059 3,059
    LGBT rights 4,879 4,879
    Criminal justice 4,048 4,048
    Personal life 9,846 9,846
    Public image 10,494 10,494
    Publications 810 810
    See also 634 634
    Notes 26 26
    References 1,269 1,269
    Further reading 353 353
    External links 201 7,853
    Official 286 286
    Other 7,366 7,366
    Total 224,144 224,144

    A fact from this article was featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the On this day section on October 20, 2021.

    The consensus version

    I don't know where I can add a message requesting an edit to Kamala's wiki page, but I would like one of the mods to add a hyperlink to the 2010 California Attorney General's election that is in the second paragraph: "Born in Oakland, California, Harris graduated from Howard University and the University of California, Hastings College of the Law. She began her career in the Alameda County District Attorney's Office, before being recruited to the San Francisco District Attorney's Office and later the City Attorney of San Francisco's office. In 2003, she was elected district attorney of San Francisco. She was elected Attorney General of California in 2010 and re-elected in 2014. Can you link 2010 to the 2010 Attorney General's election? Thanks, Rhein Amacher, Tue May 10th 8:01 PM PST. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhein Amacher (talkcontribs) 03:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

    This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

    The consensus version for describing KH's achievement is the first female vice president of the US, the first African-American, and the first Asian-American. I'm on vacation until mid-February 2021. Admins valereee, MelanieN, Drmies, Muboshgu please note and restore; otherwise, the "ethnic" sub-nationalists and trolls will have a field day. Best regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 14:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

    I concur this is the consensus version and I have restored it. "First female" is the first sentence since it is the most reported and most historic. "First African-American and first Asian-American" is the second sentence. Terms like South Asian-American, Jamaican-American, and (per the one I just replaced) Caribbean-American and should not be added without a new discussion and a new consensus. -- MelanieN (talk) 17:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
    The edits I made did not contradict the overall achievement of Harris being the "First African-American and first Asian-American" Vice President, it simply provided further accurate and separate cited detail regards her own personal family's ancestry. Though I can see the FAQ, I do Respectfully request that someone please guide me to where consensus was actually reached not to include this information. ~ BOD ~ 17:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
    Bodney, archives, linked at top of page. —valereee (talk) 18:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
    I was unable to spot the RfC in the archives, I now have thanks (maybe a simple specific wiki-link RfC: Should Kamala Harris be described as 'African American' in the lead? to similar previous archived discussions would quickly deal unknowing editors like me in future :) Thanks anyway. ~ BOD ~ 19:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
    And Bodney, the additional information about her ancestry is included in the body of the article, just not in the lead. -- MelanieN (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
    Thanks, the lead reflects the article, but I do agree that not everything can or should be in the lead, especially when an article is likely to be extensive based on her own personal biography. ~ BOD ~ 19:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
    Should we tweak the FAQ? It says South Asian American throughout, which could be confusing. —valereee (talk) 17:14, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
    I think it should simply be "Asian American". I believe that is what the sources predominantly say. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
    They say Asian-American specifically in reference to being vice president. In that position, she is not only the first South Asian, she is the first Asian. We say South Asian for other positions, such as senator where she was the first South Asian but not the first Asian. -- MelanieN (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
    If one goes far enough back, you will discover the consensus was South Asian-American. Then Sen. Harris was picked by VP Biden to be the VP nominee, and a large number of editors were attracted to this page. South Asian-American is how Sen. Harris identifies, and that is what should matter. Rklahn (talk) 07:07, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
    I believe we had consensus that the largest group should be used for the "firsts", so rather than first South Asian-American VP-elect, first Asian American was what we went with. For the senate, first South Asian-American. My question was only whether that needed to be further explained in the FAQs. Not that anyone reads them, but it's good to document what current consensus is. —valereee (talk) 11:50, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
    Im not sure such a consensus existed, but I am also not the Oracle of consensus. That begin said, yes, there is value in documenting what the current consensus is. I think it moves us closer to consensus having some of the attributes of Stare decisis. I think that this idea floating around Misplaced Pages that consensus can be achieved, and in the next moment ignored, counterproductive. Rklahn (talk) 14:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
    Rklahn, I'm sorry, I have no idea what you're getting at with that final sentence. —valereee (talk) 15:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
    Please tweak the FAQ to reflect her new status. Yes, it should be the first female, first African-American, and first Asian-American, in that order. In my view, Af-Ams takes precedence over As-Ams in the context of the US, not only because they go back further in this history of the US (indeed on average they precede even European Americans), but also because they have played a major role in the creation of the American ethos. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:51, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
    PS She is and will remain the second female African-American senator and the first South Asian American (senator) in US history. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 17:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
    Fowler&fowler, can you clarify what you mean by new status? —valereee (talk) 21:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
    Valereee, The point Im getting at is that true consensus on Misplaced Pages is illusory. On this very page, on this very subject, I worked hard with a group of Editors to achieve a consensus, which we did. Out in the open and on these Talk pages. Less than a week later, that consensus was ignored. So, any move that gets us closer to consensus meaning something is welcome to me. Rklahn (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
    Rklahn, diffs please? I'm still not following. —valereee (talk) 21:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
    By new status I meant from senator to VP-nominee (and VP-elect and eventually VP). Fowler&fowler«Talk» 21:46, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
    Valereee I cant even find the consensus Im referring to in the Talk Archive. Im reasonably sure it happened before the Talk pages were archived at all, so maybe it got lost in the shuffle. I think at this point the best move for me is to drop the point, which is minor anyways, and to say that I support efforts to document the consensus, whatever it is. Rklahn (talk) 22:09, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
    please read the FAQ above--RegentsPark (comment) 13:55, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

    First African American is disingenuous (at the very least) to say she is African American. Her father was Jamaican...how is this a qualifier for African American inclusion? The last I checked Jamaica was in the Caribbean and not on the continent of Africa. My asking this question and pointing out the obvious probably makes me a racist and surely a half dozen other socially stigmatizing labels. Though an answer would be appreciated. Signed an unimportant IP address editor.2600:1700:7610:41E0:C5FD:ED64:EB06:3ADA (talk) 22:58, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

    How do you think the Afro-Jamaicans wound up in Jamaica? Magic? Volunteer Marek 23:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
    Read the FAQ at the top of the page. This has been answered countless times already. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

    Wow! what a friendly and courteous answer from a arrogant and aggressive editor. I asked a question and I get sarcasm. Though in your response you do agree with me and yourself call her Afro-Jamaican and not African-American...hmm...interesting...don't ya think? This is probably why this article and many others do not get improved and only sink deeper into the abyss. The second response was much friendlier and appreciated. Thank you. Though I still find it inaccurate and barring a family tree likely inaccurate to be described as it is. Wouldn't one of the terms Black Caribbean, Afro or Black West Indian or Afro or Black Antillean or Afro-Jamaican (as the first respondent used) to be more accurate in describing her ancestry seeing as no documentation or family tree is provided or cited within the article itself. I would think an encyclopedia should be as factual and reference filled before taking a large leap (of faith with assumption) such as this article has done. Thank you and have a blessed day. 2600:1700:7610:41E0:64D8:8847:54E7:E855 (talk) 09:57, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

    I am Australian and only drop in here occasionally. To answer the comments above, her father was Afro-Jamaican. As she is American, that makes her both Afro-American and Jamaican-American. In Australia, we have politicians who were child immigrants from Malaysia, but they are both Malaysian-Australian and Chinese-Australian. As with many people, if you look at enough generations, you find all sorts of interesting history. --Scott Davis 10:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
    This is well covered ground. Countless editors have spent a long time discussing this, and 2600:1700:7610:41E0:64D8:8847:54E7:E855, you have brought nothing new to the conversation, and ask the same questions countless editors have asked. Please take the time to cover the discussions in the archives.
    And what the heck? Ill repeat this too. You are confusing race with ethnicity. Race is grouping based on society's view. Ethnicity is grouping based on how people see themselves in common with others. Ms. Harris race is unimportant. Her ethnicity is paramount. She is African-American and South Asian-American. Rklahn (talk) 14:04, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
    One issue that deserves a lot more attention in this article is her relationship with Willie Brown. While a 29-year-old deputy district attorney, Harris had an affair with then 60-year leader of the California legislature Willie Brown. While they were dating, Brown appointed Harris to two paid commission posts, and effectively jump-started her political career. As she would likely never have had a political career otherwise, an item of this significance should be prominently mentioned, perhaps in the lede. Certainly it deserves more than part of a sentence buried deep within the article. Vinny Gambino (talk) 22:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
    We have discussed the Willie Brown connection many times, and seemed to reach a consensus that presents the facts in a balanced encyclopedic way with an appropriate amount of weight. That being said, if you have a proposed edit, let's talk about it. Rklahn (talk) 22:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

    I also have a few of questions regarding Harris' past employment history, specifically her being hired as Alameda county Deputy DA in 1990 (she was 26-years-old). Two of the requirements for that job is almost always to have clerked for a judge and have experience as an attorney in private practice or as a Deputy DA. Harris had neither. In fact, she never had a job until she was given her Deputy DA job. It should be noted in the article, in my opinion, that she had a resume that should have precluded her from getting that job. She claims to have gotten "involved" with Willie Brown in 1994. Well, the lack of a worthy or notable resume seems to indicate someone - someone of considerable influence - pulled strings to get her that Deputy DA job in 1990. Willie Brown was certainly someone who at that time, being Speaker of the CA Assembly, could have arranged her employment as a Deputy DA in Alameda county. Alameda county was in his district at that time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9000:6201:a79b:2913:a3bc:f1d3:c561 (talk)

    Your opinion of the matter has no bearing whatsoever on a Misplaced Pages article. If you have an actual suggestion of an addition to an article, then by all means produce one, sourced to a reliable source. Zaathras (talk) 04:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
    I don't think the requirements are that high. See for example Indeed's list of open positions. IIRC, there was little interest among graduates to work for the county DA. In any case, you would need a source that said their was something exceptional about this. Otherwise, it's just a case of a law grad getting an entry level job that paid below average. TFD (talk) 20:13, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

    "49th and current"

    Please consider joining the feedback request service.
    An editor has requested comments from other editors for this discussion. This page has been added to the following lists: When discussion has ended, remove this tag and it will be removed from the lists. If this page is on additional lists, they will be noted below.

    Should we have the phrase "...and current", removed from the intro? GoodDay (talk) 21:56, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

    Note: Same RFC being held at the Joe Biden bio. GoodDay (talk) 09:13, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

    Survey

    • Neutral - Doesn't matter to me, as long as we have the intros of the Biden & Harris bios, in sync. GoodDay (talk) 21:55, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Remove It is redundant and against MOS. MOS:REALTIME gives the example: The information that "The current president, Cristina Fernández, took office in 2007", or "Cristina Fernández has been president since 2007", is better rendered "Cristina Fernández became president in 2007". . – Muboshgu (talk) 22:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Remove. Relative temporal language should be avoided, since it will become inaccurate in the future (and even though the article about Harris is likely to be updated as soon as "current" is no longer true, there will still be permalinks, printed and other offline versions, and so on). Language which will always be accurate, even in a thousand years, is always preferable to language which will become outdated and incorrect. Seraphimblade 22:34, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Remove per jpgordon below, it is redundant. Redundant language bloats articles and takes longer to read. TFD (talk) 23:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    • Remove As I said below. --jpgordon 00:17, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    • I support whatever the parallel Joe Biden RfC resolves as. The questions are the same (and I see no reason why one article should be worded differently than the other), but the Joe Biden article is more heavily watched so his RfC should attract more attention. Endwise (talk) 09:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
    @Endwise: I considered combining the two RFCs at Biden's page, covering both Biden & Harris. But, didn't know how to do it. If someone knew how? I wouldn't object to it. GoodDay (talk) 21:20, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

    Discussion

    "is the 49th and current" -- "and current" is redundant, since "is" means "right now". If "and current" was not there, would it be ambiguous or vague? --jpgordon 00:44, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

    Agree completely. "And current" is redundant with the present tense of the sentence. Why use two extra words that aren't needed? – Muboshgu (talk) 00:45, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    It should remain with "...and current", until this is settled over at the Joe Biden article. Best not to 'force' changes, without getting a consensus & best to keep the Biden & Harris bios intros in sync. GoodDay (talk) 21:44, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    Well, you just violated the discretionary standards here; perhaps you should revert yourself and back off a bit. --jpgordon 22:44, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    I violated nothing. Would be better if you cooled off & let the RFC run its course & respect the 'current' status quo. GoodDay (talk) 22:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    There was no RFC on this page, and you did two identical reverts in 24 hours. I only became aware of the discussion there when you mentioned it here. What do you mean "cool off"? You're the one aggressively reverting, not me. --jpgordon 23:41, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
    It's past 24 hrs now. GoodDay (talk) 23:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

    If it's removed. Would "49th vice president of the United States, since 2021", be an acceptable alternative? GoodDay (talk) 21:18, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

    It seems like excessive information. If she's the current VP, obviously she she hasn't served as long in her office as Elizabeth II. TFD (talk) 02:28, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
    Categories: