Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Poetry: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:41, 3 July 2022 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,963 edits Duino Elegies FAR← Previous edit Revision as of 01:00, 4 July 2022 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,294,330 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Poetry/Archive 8) (botNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:


I've made a comment at ] pertaining to notability criteria for writers. I think members of this project (particularly those interested in contemporary poetry and living poets) could bring valuable perspectives to the discussion. ] (]) I've made a comment at ] pertaining to notability criteria for writers. I think members of this project (particularly those interested in contemporary poetry and living poets) could bring valuable perspectives to the discussion. ] (])

==Poetic form category==

So I was looking up poetic forms, and then hit the category section, but then it's missing forms in the master list. The poetic forms by nation or language is down to a handful. There are categories for specific countries, but they are disconnected. For example, https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Korean_poetry does not show up in https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Poetic_form_by_nation_or_language

So I'm asking for someone, though a tiny bit dull type of work to fix this. It's missing the whole of Latin America, Indigenous populations, and Africa, not to mention the South Pacific, e.g. Australia, New Zealand, Pacific Islands? =P

https://en.wikipedia.org/Category:Poetic_form

It's not fun work, but looks necessary. --] (]) 14:51, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
:English Misplaced Pages infamously underrepresents certain areas. You seem to have some knowledge of these topics. Is there a reason why you haven't created them yourself yet? (Also, Misplaced Pages pages don't need to be shared as external links. For example, simply typing ] with that colon is a bit easier.) --] (]) 19:27, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

== Featured Article Review for ] ==

I have nominated ] for a ]. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets ]. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are ].<!--Template:FARMessage--> ] (]) 17:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)


== User script to detect unreliable sources == == User script to detect unreliable sources ==

Revision as of 01:00, 4 July 2022

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Poetry and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8Auto-archiving period: 3 months 

Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

WikiProject iconPoetry NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Poetry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of poetry on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoetryWikipedia:WikiProject PoetryTemplate:WikiProject PoetryPoetry
NAThis page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Shortcut

Input sought

I've made a comment at Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (people)#Creative professionals guidelines pertaining to notability criteria for writers. I think members of this project (particularly those interested in contemporary poetry and living poets) could bring valuable perspectives to the discussion. Cynwolfe (talk)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Misplaced Pages. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:José Corazón de Jesús#Requested move 27 April 2022

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:José Corazón de Jesús#Requested move 27 April 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 20:29, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Looking for peer review of Paul Goodman

Hi all, I'm looking for peer reviews of our article on the American public intellectual and poet Paul Goodman before it goes to FAC, if anyone would be so inclined: Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Paul Goodman/archive1. No prior experience necessary—just want to know how it reads for a general audience, given that the content gets a bit obtuse. czar 19:14, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Duino Elegies Featured article review

I have nominated Duino Elegies for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Categories: