| Revision as of 18:39, 24 May 2022 editWiae (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers77,873 edits →Recent edit reversion: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:13, 16 July 2022 edit undoWiae (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers77,873 edits Warning: Edit warring on Steven Bartlett (businessman).Tag: TwinkleNext edit → | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| :::It must be a complete coincidence that all bad news is immediately removed from all 'Social Chain' wikipedia entries? LOL ] (]) 18:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC) | :::It must be a complete coincidence that all bad news is immediately removed from all 'Social Chain' wikipedia entries? LOL ] (]) 18:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Both S Philbrick and I ] that are likely to include text improperly copied from a copyrighted source. This draft popped up at the top of the list, and this is how we came across it so quickly. Thanks, ] ] 18:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC) | ::::Both S Philbrick and I ] that are likely to include text improperly copied from a copyrighted source. This draft popped up at the top of the list, and this is how we came across it so quickly. Thanks, ] ] 18:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC) | ||
| == July 2022 == | |||
| ] Hi Steven Weaven! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of ] several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the ] policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable. | |||
| All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article ] to try to reach ]. If you are unable to agree at ], please use one of the ] to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ] ] 18:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:13, 16 July 2022
April 2022
Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Social Chain have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Misplaced Pages as a "soapbox" are against Misplaced Pages policy and not permitted; Misplaced Pages articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Misplaced Pages. Thank you. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
- If information isn't accurate you can edit it. Feel free to change my latest update but please don't remove it, this is a public information site. Steven Weaven (talk) 15:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Social Chain
The article Social Chain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Only one source of coverage; comments on only one small aspect of topic.
While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed, Willondon (talk) 15:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Social Chain (Manchester) (May 22)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Social Chain (Manchester) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Misplaced Pages's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Social Chain (Manchester), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Steven Weaven! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 07:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC) |
Recent edit reversion
In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.
I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.
I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Misplaced Pages article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 16:44, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Rubbish, these are facts from a BBC article. This is pure censorship, are you being paid? Steven Weaven (talk) 17:02, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Steven Weaven, I have had to remove this content again from the article. The vast majority of content that appears on the Internet (including the content copied from the BBC) is copyrighted. Misplaced Pages's policies do not allow us to copy and paste content from such articles. I would encourage you to re-read our copyright policy to become familiar with the specifics. I would also remind you that Misplaced Pages is a collaborative environment, and that jumping to accusations of "being paid" could be seen as falling afoul of our rules on assuming good faith of others. It's important to work collaboratively with our fellow contributors. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 17:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- It must be a complete coincidence that all bad news is immediately removed from all 'Social Chain' wikipedia entries? LOL Steven Weaven (talk) 18:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Both S Philbrick and I patrol the list of articles that are likely to include text improperly copied from a copyrighted source. This draft popped up at the top of the list, and this is how we came across it so quickly. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 18:39, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- It must be a complete coincidence that all bad news is immediately removed from all 'Social Chain' wikipedia entries? LOL Steven Weaven (talk) 18:34, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- Steven Weaven, I have had to remove this content again from the article. The vast majority of content that appears on the Internet (including the content copied from the BBC) is copyrighted. Misplaced Pages's policies do not allow us to copy and paste content from such articles. I would encourage you to re-read our copyright policy to become familiar with the specifics. I would also remind you that Misplaced Pages is a collaborative environment, and that jumping to accusations of "being paid" could be seen as falling afoul of our rules on assuming good faith of others. It's important to work collaboratively with our fellow contributors. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. Thanks, /wiae /tlk 17:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
Hi Steven Weaven! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Steven Bartlett (businessman) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Steven Bartlett (businessman), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 18:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)