| Revision as of 00:08, 17 July 2022 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,963 edits MoreTag: Reverted← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:11, 17 July 2022 edit undoSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,963 edits DoneTag: RevertedNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :<small>''Notified: ], ], ], ], ''</small> | :<small>''Notified: ], ], ], ], ''</small> | ||
| :: <small> Additional notifications: ], ], ], ], ], ], ]'' </small> ] (]) 22:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC) | :: <small> Additional notifications: ], ], ], ], ], ], ]'' </small> ] (]) 22:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ::: <small> Completing notifications not done above: ], ] |
::: <small> Completing notifications not done above: ], ]. ] (]) 00:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC) </small> | ||
| I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he {{xt|just stumbled upon it}}. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. ] (]) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC) | I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he {{xt|just stumbled upon it}}. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. ] (]) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:11, 17 July 2022
Baháʼí Faith
Baháʼí Faith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Cuñado, Gazelle55, dragfyre, Bahá'í Faith WikiProject, diff for talk page notification 2021-11-15
- Additional notifications: Dominic, Smkolins, WP Iran, WP Religion, WP Islam, WP History, WP Theology SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Completing notifications not done above: Cuñado, Gazelle55. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
- Additional notifications: Dominic, Smkolins, WP Iran, WP Religion, WP Islam, WP History, WP Theology SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he just stumbled upon it. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. Nutez (talk) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Nice to see renewed interest in doing this.Smkolins (talk) 15:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)