| Revision as of 09:59, 17 July 2022 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,969 edits See talk← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:57, 17 July 2022 edit undoSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,969 edits →Baháʼí Faith: wayward italicsNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| <!-- Please don't edit anything above here. Be sure to include your reasons for nominating below. --> | <!-- Please don't edit anything above here. Be sure to include your reasons for nominating below. --> | ||
| :<small>''Notified: ], ], ], ], ''</small> | :<small>''Notified: ], ], ], ], ''</small> | ||
| :: <small> Additional notifications: ], ], ], ], ], ], ]'' ] (]) 22:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC) | :: <small> ''Additional notifications: ], ], ], ], ], ], ].'' ] (]) 22:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
| ::: Additional at ]'' ] (]) 09:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC) </small> | ::: ''Additional at ]'' ] (]) 09:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC) </small> | ||
| I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he {{xt|just stumbled upon it}}. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. ] (]) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC) | I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he {{xt|just stumbled upon it}}. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. ] (]) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:57, 17 July 2022
Baháʼí Faith
Baháʼí Faith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Cuñado, Gazelle55, dragfyre, Bahá'í Faith WikiProject, diff for talk page notification 2021-11-15
- Additional notifications: Dominic, Smkolins, WP Iran, WP Religion, WP Islam, WP History, WP Theology. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:24, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
I am nominating this featured article for review because it hasn't been reviewed formally in over 15 years. The original FAC from 2004 is also (relatively) thin, with the nominator himself conceding that he just stumbled upon it. The FA vetting process has been improved considerably since the noughties, and different standards apply. I posted an informal review notice on the talk page last year, to some response from editors interested in the topic, who nevertheless seemed a bit preoccupied with other tasks. Nutez (talk) 15:13, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
- Nice to see renewed interest in doing this.Smkolins (talk) 15:25, 16 July 2022 (UTC)