Revision as of 14:13, 20 July 2022 editTompaDompa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,665 edits →Citations on Space Age: Comment.Tag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:05, 20 July 2022 edit undoJustinTime55 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users24,881 edits →Citations on Space Age: RespondTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit → | ||
Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
Hey Justin, I had added a BBC foreign language citation into the article which you under "citation overkill". Just for your information it is partially a result of an ongoing discussion at ], and on the verge of going to ] due to it on a tense stalemate.] (]) 12:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC) | Hey Justin, I had added a BBC foreign language citation into the article which you under "citation overkill". Just for your information it is partially a result of an ongoing discussion at ], and on the verge of going to ] due to it on a tense stalemate.] (]) 12:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
:Thank you, I'm aware of the NPOVN. You are the one which seems to be defying consensus; another user, {{ping|Ilenart626}} has also removed your citations from the other two, citing ''lack of consensus''. As the Overkill essay says, simply coat-racking more citations to support your side can be bad form. A Chinese version of BBC doesn't really add anything to verify Gagarin's first spaceflight (which is ''not in contention'' anyway). ] (]) 16:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC) | |||
:As {{u|Chipmunkdavis}} might {{diff2|1096917931|say}}, "tense stalemate" {{tq|is certainly one way to describe all other editors agreeing}} that your suggestions are bad. ] (]) 14:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC) | :As {{u|Chipmunkdavis}} might {{diff2|1096917931|say}}, "tense stalemate" {{tq|is certainly one way to describe all other editors agreeing}} that your suggestions are bad. ] (]) 14:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks for the support; glad to see I'm recognized as a "subject matter expert". I've stayed out of the fray; it seems like way too much ] being made of a dispute which should be easily resolvable by growing the hell up and presenting the verifiable mainstream facts in a NPOV way. These facts are without lack of historical consensus: | |||
:* Gagarin is acknowledged as first human in space and in orbit; as the FAI decided, it's a trivial technicality he didn't land in the craft. | |||
:* Shepard is the first American in space; also first to control his spacecraft and land in it (but no cigar as far as "first in space" goes). | |||
: The FAI's pedigree to acquire jurisdiction as the world's authority on spaceflight (strikes me as) a bit dubious, given they were an airsports association; nonetheless, they have become so recognized. | |||
:The Ukranian war is tragic, but really has nothing at all to do with this. ] (]) 16:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:05, 20 July 2022
Hello, welcome to my talk page!If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
|
Disambiguation link notification for May 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Space vehicle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spaceship.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Star Trek uniforms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commodore.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Space Transportation System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Mueller.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Space Race § NPOV issues
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Space Race § NPOV issues. 204.15.72.92 (talk) 12:37, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard § NPOV issues in some sections at Space Race
You are invited to join the discussion at Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard § NPOV issues in some sections at Space Race. 204.15.72.92 (talk) 20:10, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Apollo–Soyuz
Hey JustinTime, I was’nt after a debate on who won the space race. My main issue was that quote was out of context for that article. The reason why I added the bit about contraversy was I tried to make a compromise edit with Bilcat, but they just reverted both my edits Ilenart626 (talk) 21:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- I'm well aware of the edit history, thank you. We still need to thoughtfully reach consensus on whether or not to mention some think it the end. Many times, reaching consensus requires some debate. JustinTime55 (talk) 21:42, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
Citations on Space Age
Hey Justin, I had added a BBC foreign language citation into the article which you reverted under "citation overkill". Just for your information it is partially a result of an ongoing discussion at WP:NPOVN#First_human_spaceflight, and on the verge of going to WP:RFC due to it on a tense stalemate.193.233.171.17 (talk) 12:56, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you, I'm aware of the NPOVN. You are the one which seems to be defying consensus; another user, @Ilenart626: has also removed your citations from the other two, citing lack of consensus. As the Overkill essay says, simply coat-racking more citations to support your side can be bad form. A Chinese version of BBC doesn't really add anything to verify Gagarin's first spaceflight (which is not in contention anyway). JustinTime55 (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
- As Chipmunkdavis might say, "tense stalemate"
is certainly one way to describe all other editors agreeing
that your suggestions are bad. TompaDompa (talk) 14:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)- Thanks for the support; glad to see I'm recognized as a "subject matter expert". I've stayed out of the fray; it seems like way too much WP:Wikidrama being made of a dispute which should be easily resolvable by growing the hell up and presenting the verifiable mainstream facts in a NPOV way. These facts are without lack of historical consensus:
- Gagarin is acknowledged as first human in space and in orbit; as the FAI decided, it's a trivial technicality he didn't land in the craft.
- Shepard is the first American in space; also first to control his spacecraft and land in it (but no cigar as far as "first in space" goes).
- The FAI's pedigree to acquire jurisdiction as the world's authority on spaceflight (strikes me as) a bit dubious, given they were an airsports association; nonetheless, they have become so recognized.
- The Ukranian war is tragic, but really has nothing at all to do with this. JustinTime55 (talk) 16:05, 20 July 2022 (UTC)