Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Rõmuuta: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:48, 26 July 2022 editJontesta (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,470 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Rõmuuta.Tag: Twinkle  Revision as of 22:19, 26 July 2022 edit undoTTN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users58,138 edits RõmuutaNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
No ] in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, and so this does not meet the ] guideline. ] (]) 18:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC) No ] in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, and so this does not meet the ] guideline. ] (]) 18:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 18:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 18:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' - Not seeing much on even the author from a brief glance. Could be more sources on him in his language, but seems doubtful this fictional location would ever be more than a footnote. ] (]) 22:19, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:19, 26 July 2022

Rõmuuta

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Rõmuuta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:SIGCOV in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, and so this does not meet the WP:NOTABILITY guideline. Jontesta (talk) 18:48, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Categories: