Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Legion in popular culture (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:57, 31 July 2022 editPbritti (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers37,982 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:35, 2 August 2022 edit undoMalcolmxl5 (talk | contribs)Administrators149,070 edits Legion in popular culture: Closed as delete (XFDcloser
Line 1: Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate afd vfd xfd-closed archived" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
<!--Template:Afd top

Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

The result was '''delete'''. ] (]) 21:35, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
===]=== ===]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|F}}
<div class="infobox" style="width:33%">AfDs for this article: <div class="infobox" style="width:33%">AfDs for this article:
{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legion in popular culture}} {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legion in popular culture}}
Line 17: Line 23:
*<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ] and ]. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 09:51, 31 July 2022 (UTC)</small> *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ] lists for the following topics: ] and ]. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 09:51, 31 July 2022 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' per above reasoning. Any significant coverage of Legion's impact on popular culture should not take the form of a list but should appear on the article for the demon itself. Thanks for opening this AfD. ~ ] (]) 16:57, 31 July 2022 (UTC) *'''Delete''' per above reasoning. Any significant coverage of Legion's impact on popular culture should not take the form of a list but should appear on the article for the demon itself. Thanks for opening this AfD. ~ ] (]) 16:57, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ] or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''<!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Latest revision as of 21:35, 2 August 2022

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:35, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Legion in popular culture

AfDs for this article:

New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Legion in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find WP:SIGCOV in reliable third party sources to met Misplaced Pages's WP:NOTABILITY guideline. The substance WP:INDISCRIMINATE with lots of use of the word "Legion" without having any WP:VERIFIABLE connection. Previously nominated for being WP:OR with the promise that it would be sourced, and it simply cannot be because sufficient sources don't exist. Jontesta (talk) 19:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.