User talk:Eastonio Thomasito: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 19:35, 8 August 2022 editIngenuity (talk \| contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,832 edits Warning: Vandalism.Tag: Twinkle ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:36, 8 August 2022 edit undoPraxidicae (talk \| contribs)Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers169,003 edits Warning: Three-revert rule on Recession.Tag: Twinkle Next edit →
Line 77:		Line 77:

	] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] Misplaced Pages, you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> <span style="font-family:monospace;padding:3px 5px;background:#eee;color:black">>>> ].]();</span> 19:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)		] Please stop your ]. If you continue to ] Misplaced Pages, you may be ]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> <span style="font-family:monospace;padding:3px 5px;background:#eee;color:black">>>> ].]();</span> 19:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

			] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

			'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''Read the talk page and extensive discussions there and ] and ] about this.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 19:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:36, 8 August 2022

This is Eastonio Thomasito's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages.The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Misplaced Pages's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. The comment the reviewer left was: Please review WP:YFA and the notability guidelines. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Eastonio Thomasito/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 01:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Eastonio Thomasito! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 01:44, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Brett Cooper (Daily Wire)

I really want to make an artice for Brett Cooper from the daily wire but i cant seem to find enough information about her life. Eastonio Thomasito (talk) 00:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. The comment the reviewer left was: YouTube and DailyWire are not reliable sources, and you cannot cite Misplaced Pages as a source on Misplaced Pages. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Eastonio Thomasito/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:07, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was: This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Misplaced Pages article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Misplaced Pages. The comment the reviewer left was: None of these sources are reliable. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Eastonio Thomasito/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 19:13, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:14, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brett Cooper (Daily Wire) (August 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Misplaced Pages's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ingenuity was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Misplaced Pages. The comment the reviewer left was: Resubmitting with zero improvement is disruptive. None of the sources are reliable, and the prose is nowhere near the quality expected of an article. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 19:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

August 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 19:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Recession shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Read the talk page and extensive discussions there and WP:AN and WP:ANI about this. PRAXIDICAE🌈 19:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)