| Revision as of 09:07, 22 August 2022 editLaundryPizza03 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users50,837 edits Updating nomination page with notices (assisted)← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:34, 22 August 2022 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,861 edits →List of ER characters: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] (]) 23:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. –] (]]) 09:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)</small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. –] (]]) 09:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)</small> | ||
| :*'''Weak delete'''/'''redirect'''. Ugh. A major show back in the day, we have plenty of articles about individual characters, some of which may be notable. This list fails to show why they are notable as a grouping, and is indeed pretty ]y, although I wouldn't be surpsised if something could be found for NLIST. At minimum, this needs to be pruned, and ], a ], needs to be merged into it. Or just redirected. If nobody can show his NLIST is met, a redirect to ] will do for now. Ping me if arguments for keeping this as meeting NLIST are presented. | |||
| :<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</sub> 12:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:34, 22 August 2022
List of ER characters
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- List of ER characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In-universe fancruft which fails NLIST. All primary sources and IMDB. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 23:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 23:15, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:07, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete/redirect. Ugh. A major show back in the day, we have plenty of articles about individual characters, some of which may be notable. This list fails to show why they are notable as a grouping, and is indeed pretty WP:FANCRUFTy, although I wouldn't be surpsised if something could be found for NLIST. At minimum, this needs to be pruned, and Cast of ER, a WP:POVFORK, needs to be merged into it. Or just redirected. If nobody can show his NLIST is met, a redirect to ER_(TV_series)#Cast_and_characters will do for now. Ping me if arguments for keeping this as meeting NLIST are presented.
- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)