| Revision as of 15:15, 24 February 2007 editJreferee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,390 edits Fixed link← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:23, 25 February 2007 edit undoSusanLesch (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers68,919 edits commentsNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==200+ Biography article assessments== | ==200+ Biography article assessments== | ||
| Per a request a few hours ago, I banged out . -- ] 01:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | Per a request a few hours ago, I banged out . -- ] 01:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==Criteria and articles with comments== | |||
| Hi. I bumped into this page in my watchlist and wanted to suggest three things. One, the comments reviewers give editors are among the best things I have received from WikiProject Biography. Would it be possible to give people some idea of how to improve their articles? For Stub, and perhaps Start, a copy/paste of the steps to B class might work (I saw someone do this today and it worked well). For B and above more personalized comments might help. Second, could the criteria on which grading is done be part of "Instructions on how to assess a Biography article"? For example I am not sure that length is the sole difference between Stub and a Start (the quality scale says Stub is "either a very short article or a rough collection of information..."). Third, I would encourage use of the quality scale shared by all the projects (it does not forbid A class before GA, a rule that seems to have been introduced in this drive). Hope this helps. -] 00:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:23, 25 February 2007
200+ Biography article assessments
Per a request a few hours ago, I banged out 200+ Biography assessments. -- Jreferee 01:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Criteria and articles with comments
Hi. I bumped into this page in my watchlist and wanted to suggest three things. One, the comments reviewers give editors are among the best things I have received from WikiProject Biography. Would it be possible to give people some idea of how to improve their articles? For Stub, and perhaps Start, a copy/paste of the steps to B class might work (I saw someone do this today and it worked well). For B and above more personalized comments might help. Second, could the criteria on which grading is done be part of "Instructions on how to assess a Biography article"? For example I am not sure that length is the sole difference between Stub and a Start (the quality scale says Stub is "either a very short article or a rough collection of information..."). Third, I would encourage use of the quality scale shared by all the projects (it does not forbid A class before GA, a rule that seems to have been introduced in this drive). Hope this helps. -Susanlesch 00:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)