Revision as of 07:31, 2 September 2022 editChlod (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors17,659 edits →Template-protected edit request on 2 September 2022: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit |
Revision as of 13:52, 2 September 2022 edit undoAndrybak (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Template editors81,061 edits →Template-protected edit request on 2 September 2022: Responded to edit requestTag: editProtectedHelperNext edit → |
Line 10: |
Line 10: |
|
== Template-protected edit request on 2 September 2022 == |
|
== Template-protected edit request on 2 September 2022 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{tper|Module:Storm categories/categories}} |
|
{{edit template-protected|Module:Storm categories/categories|answered=yes}} |
|
Please add the icon for the "vstyphoon" category (around line 196): |
|
Please add the icon for the "vstyphoon" category (around line 196): |
|
<syntaxhighlight lang="lua" line start="195"> |
|
<syntaxhighlight lang="lua" line start="195"> |
Line 29: |
Line 29: |
|
:], could you please clarify: after the proposed changes are applied, will the overrides from ] need to be removed? —] (]) 07:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
:], could you please clarify: after the proposed changes are applied, will the overrides from ] need to be removed? —] (]) 07:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
::@]: Well, they ''should'' be removed since an override would no longer be needed. It won't immediately break if there is a conflict. <span style="background:#ffff55">''''']'''''</span> <small style="font-size:calc(1em - 2pt)">(])</small> 07:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
::@]: Well, they ''should'' be removed since an override would no longer be needed. It won't immediately break if there is a conflict. <span style="background:#ffff55">''''']'''''</span> <small style="font-size:calc(1em - 2pt)">(])</small> 07:31, 2 September 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ETp --> —] (]) 13:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC) |
Given the concerns regarding the changed colors and their relation to the ongoing ArbCom case against WPTC regarding stealth canvassing (which the process was heavily tainted by) – brought up here, here and here (the last one brought up by me specifically to get more input from members) – I propose that until the ArbCom case is finalized on May 4 (under a month from now) the legacy colors be temporarily restored until a decision on what to do regarding the RfC’s outcomes is made. The reasoning behind this is mostly to fix the discrepancy between the infoboxes/timelines and the track maps themselves, given that the project was in the middle of re-discussing a new scheme after the previous consensus and had not updated the maps. Even now, currently active systems are still using the old color scale for the track maps so I think it is better that at least for the next month we follow that so as to not give confusion to new readers. This is a genuine concern and not a case of WP:IDLI as I am considering the ramifications the currently convoluted situation has right now on our new readers. MarioProtIV (/contribs) 15:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)