Misplaced Pages

User talk:Robotman1974: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:25, 25 February 2007 editAddict 2006 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,754 edits You think it's funny. I say what the nonsense. Undid revision 110739124 by Mattlolwtf (talk)← Previous edit Revision as of 21:50, 25 February 2007 edit undoPeace237 (talk | contribs)264 edits welcomeNext edit →
Line 65: Line 65:
--] ] 23:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC) --] ] 23:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
:''My response is ].'' ]] 23:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC) :''My response is ].'' ]] 23:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

== welcome ==

{{Welc||] 21:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 21:50, 25 February 2007

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom and start with an appropriate heading, for better formatting. You can just press the plus sign (+) on the top of this page to do that. Don't forget to sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Archiving icon
Archives

Archive 1 - Sept 2006 to Jan 2007


Comments? Questions? Issues?

Please leave recent comments at the bottom of my talk page.

After your last warning

Another two - to my revert at History - what do you say AIV sooner than later? SatuSuro 14:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

My response is here. Robotman 20:35, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Nudity

The gallery is not a good idea. I mean no offense, and your edits are well meaning, I have no doubt.

But, if you do that, then a few other people will add any nude image they find there, and the whole gallery will be deleted bases on the rationale (correct) that the article is not a collection of nude images, and images that do not illustrate specific content should be removed. Thanks! Atom 02:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

My response is here. Robotman 03:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

History

At what stage do we ask for protection ( i cannot remember if I have already asked ) ? SatuSuro 12:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

My response is here. Robotman 12:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

My immediate response was Siapa itu? - indonesian for who is that? SatuSuro 12:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Dont ever ask my my attitude to us media, but that is dumb - is he from the mid-west, or texas? SatuSuro 12:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Well - the rate that you , I and others are reverting rubbish from history and history portal is beyond the joke - regardless... I might just take it off my watch list - as I am losing my sense of humour with either the obscenities or childish mess... SatuSuro 12:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Hey if youre correct - I'll keep it on - you seem to do about 5 reverts to one of mine... :) but if it is noticeable that there are more than so many a day >. well that time it will be for the blunderbuss I say! cheers! SatuSuro 13:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Transwikification

Wiktionary is not a dumping ground. It is a dictionary, that takes words and idioms. It does not take encyclopaedia articles with non-idiomatic titles. Please do not mark encyclopaedia articles for transwikification. Uncle G 01:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

My response is here. Robotman 01:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Your AIV report

Thank you for making a report in respect of User:Saminferno on Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Removing and reporting vandalism is vital to the functioning of Misplaced Pages and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them again to the AIV noticeboard. Thanks. Sandstein 07:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

My response is here. Robotman 08:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Yes, administrators may block vandalism-only accounts. However, blocks are preventative, not punitive. If somebody receives a final warning (in this case, by you on 07:34, 11 February 2007) and does not vandalise afterwards, the blocking policy does not allow us to block them even though they have disregarded a previous warning. Again, thanks for your vandal-fighting work. Sandstein 17:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Count Basie

That's okay. If I knew what I was doing, I wouldn't need the help... It's been 4 months since I've screencapped for Misplaced Pages, and I'm very rusty. --SeanO 21:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

I'll take care of it.--Isotope23 17:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Just wanna know...

=What do you like robot sex so much. No offense at all. I'm just curious. By the way. Sorry for my vandalism :(.-historywiz123 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Historywiz123 (talkcontribs) 21:35, 21 February 2007.

I too would like to know what is so good about robot sex. And i too am sorry for vandalism. Helper55 04:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Apologies accepted. I don't know why I have a fembot fetish... I think fetishes are to be enjoyed rather than understood. Robotman 15:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Copyvio warning tags

Sure is! They sequence 1 through 4, just like all the warning tags do, in this format: {{subst:uw-copyright1|Articlename}} Seraphimblade 01:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Just wanted to say thanks for reverting the vandalism on my page. I didn't even realize that it had been vandalized. I was actually in the process of reporting that guy when he vandalized my page. Anyway, thanks for helping me out. PAK Man 03:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

My response is here. Robotman 03:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

I guess that BBB guy is gone now. Thanks for backing me up back there. --Addict 2006 03:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

blocked the IP as well

I blocked the IP that seems to be User:Bbb00723 also, since all its edits seem to be the same kind of vandalism; thanks for pointing it out. --Delirium 03:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

You didn't vandalize anything. Kgb23 threw a NON-SUBST'ED vandalism 4 warning on you. Did that to me too.

--Addict 2006 23:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

My response is here. Robotman 23:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

welcome

Welcome!

Hi Robotman1974! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!