| Revision as of 05:06, 28 February 2007 editAftli (talk | contribs)53 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:33, 28 February 2007 edit undoJmax- (talk | contribs)910 edits reformat by request of User:AftliNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| In order to remain listed at ], at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the ''same'' dispute with a ''single'' user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 05:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: <tt>{{CURRENTTIME}}, {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)</tt>. | |||
| --- | |||
| {{Admin|Mangojuice}} | |||
| --- | |||
| ==Statement of the dispute== | |||
| Allegations: This overzealous administrator has inappropriately used his privileges in editorial conflicts to win "edit wars" against an entire population of Wikipedians who, on the talk page, widely agree with said edits, most notably on the Shock Site entry. The user has blocked articles from being edited indiscriminately and inappropriately. There are many comments from other users relating to such situations on their talk page. ] 05:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | Allegations: This overzealous administrator has inappropriately used his privileges in editorial conflicts to win "edit wars" against an entire population of Wikipedians who, on the talk page, widely agree with said edits, most notably on the Shock Site entry. The user has blocked articles from being edited indiscriminately and inappropriately. There are many comments from other users relating to such situations on their talk page. ] 05:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| === Desired outcome === | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Aftli: below are the comments for this section; Please complete this section and remove this entire comment. -- Jmax- | |||
| ''This is a summary written by users who have initiated the request for comment. It should spell out exactly what the changes they'd like to see in the user, or what questions of behavior should be the focus.'' | |||
| The "what's the point of this again?" bit. Half of the world is going to think it's precursor to arbcom, the other half are probably not going to look to closely since the _point_ isn't clear, and the other half are going to be going for the jugular no matter what. | |||
| So here if someone *cough* would write out a nice clear concise explanation of what they hoped would happen by raising this, all would be right with the world. | |||
| --> | |||
| <!-- Aftli: Add a description here, outline each power misused and cite examples, note applicable policies, and provide evidence of attempted dispute resolution. The template below will be of much help. -- Jmax- | |||
| === Description === | |||
| === Powers misused === | |||
| *'''Protection''' (]): | |||
| :#{list page or pages protected} | |||
| *'''Deletion''' (]): | |||
| :#{list page or pages deleted} | |||
| *'''Blocking''' (]): | |||
| :#{list user or users blocked} | |||
| ===Applicable policies=== | |||
| *''']''' | |||
| :#{explain violation of protection policy here} | |||
| *''']''' | |||
| :#{explain violation of deletion policy here} | |||
| *''']''' | |||
| :#{explain violation of blocking policy here} | |||
| === Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute === | |||
| (provide diffs and links) | |||
| :# | |||
| :# | |||
| --> | |||
| === Users certifying the basis for this dispute === | |||
| <!-- Please note: If you did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, but agree with the summary's presentation of events, please sign in the next section. --> | |||
| :'''(sign with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>)''' | |||
| :# | |||
| :# | |||
| === Other users who endorse this statement === | |||
| <!-- If you agree with the summary's presentation of events but did not try and fail to resolve the dispute, please sign in this section. --> | |||
| :'''(sign with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>)''' | |||
| :# | |||
| :# | |||
Revision as of 05:33, 28 February 2007
In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 05:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 21:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC).
--- Mangojuice (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) ---
Statement of the dispute
Allegations: This overzealous administrator has inappropriately used his privileges in editorial conflicts to win "edit wars" against an entire population of Wikipedians who, on the talk page, widely agree with said edits, most notably on the Shock Site entry. The user has blocked articles from being edited indiscriminately and inappropriately. There are many comments from other users relating to such situations on their talk page. Aftli 05:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Desired outcome
Users certifying the basis for this dispute
- (sign with ~~~~)
Other users who endorse this statement
- (sign with ~~~~)